Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jefferson Abington Hospital, Abington, and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug 1;140(2):293-303. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004872. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
Absorbable suture is the preferred method of cesarean skin closure compared with metal staples, because it decreases wound complications. Two recently published trials in patients with obesity contradict this evidence. The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess whether suture remains the recommended method of cesarean skin closure, regardless of obesity status.
MEDLINE through OVID, PubMed, Cochrane Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until September 24, 2021.
Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing subcuticular absorbable suture with nonabsorbable metal staples for cesarean skin closure were included. Non-RCTs, RCTs that did not compare staples with suture, and ongoing trials were excluded. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: Data were individually abstracted and entered into RevMan. Fixed and random effects models were used. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess each study. The primary outcome, a sensitivity analysis of wound complications (excluding studies at high risk of bias), showed a significant decrease in wound complications when the cesarean skin incision was closed with suture compared with staples (10 studies; 71/1,497 vs 194/1,465; risk ratio [RR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.87). When all studies were analyzed, there remained a significant decrease in wound complications when the skin was closed with suture (14 studies; 121/1,780 vs 242/1,750; RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.97). Of the individual wound complications, wound separation was significantly decreased with suture closure compared with staples (11 studies; 55/1,319 vs 129/1,273; RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32-0.58). In patients with obesity, there remained a significant decrease in wound complications with suture closure of the skin incision compared with staples (five studies; 34/507 vs 67/522; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.75).
Closure of the cesarean skin incision with suture decreased composite wound complications by 50% as compared with closure with staples; a significant decrease persisted regardless of obesity status.
PROSPERO, CRD42021270378.
与金属钉相比,可吸收缝线是剖宫产皮肤缝合的首选方法,因为它可以减少伤口并发症。最近发表的两项针对肥胖患者的试验结果与这一证据相矛盾。本荟萃分析的目的是评估缝线是否仍然是剖宫产皮肤缝合的推荐方法,无论肥胖状况如何。
通过 OVID、PubMed、Cochrane 数据库和 ClinicalTrials.gov 对 MEDLINE 进行检索,检索时间从建库开始到 2021 年 9 月 24 日。
纳入了比较皮下可吸收缝线与非吸收性金属钉用于剖宫产皮肤缝合的随机对照试验(RCT)。排除了非 RCT、未比较缝线与钉的 RCT 以及正在进行的试验。14 项研究符合纳入标准。
数据提取、整合和结果:单独提取数据并输入 RevMan。使用固定效应模型和随机效应模型。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估每项研究。主要结局为伤口并发症的敏感性分析(排除高偏倚风险的研究),结果显示,与金属钉相比,缝线缝合剖宫产皮肤切口可显著降低伤口并发症(10 项研究;71/1497 与 194/1465;风险比[RR]0.47,95%置信区间 0.25-0.87)。当所有研究都进行分析时,缝线缝合皮肤的伤口并发症仍显著降低(14 项研究;121/1780 与 242/1750;RR 0.59,95%置信区间 0.36-0.97)。在各个伤口并发症中,缝线组的伤口分离显著低于金属钉组(11 项研究;55/1319 与 129/1273;RR 0.43,95%置信区间 0.32-0.58)。在肥胖患者中,与金属钉相比,缝线缝合皮肤切口的伤口并发症仍显著降低(5 项研究;34/507 与 67/522;RR 0.51,95%置信区间 0.34-0.75)。
与金属钉相比,缝线缝合剖宫产皮肤切口可使复合伤口并发症减少 50%;无论肥胖状况如何,这种显著降低都持续存在。
PROSPERO,CRD42021270378。