• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Electronic Health Record Algorithm Development for Research Subject Recruitment Using Colonoscopy Appointment Scheduling.利用结肠镜检查预约安排开发用于研究对象招募的电子健康记录算法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;34(1):49-60. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.01.200417.
2
Optimizing research in symptomatic uterine fibroids with development of a computable phenotype for use with electronic health records.优化有症状的子宫纤维瘤的研究,开发可计算的表型,用于电子健康记录。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):610.e1-610.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
3
Evaluation of an Algorithm for Identifying Ocular Conditions in Electronic Health Record Data.评估一种在电子健康记录数据中识别眼部疾病的算法。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 May 1;137(5):491-497. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.7051.
4
Ascertainment of colonoscopy indication using administrative data.利用行政数据确定结肠镜检查适应证。
Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Jun;55(6):1721-5. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1200-y.
5
Rule-based and machine learning algorithms identify patients with systemic sclerosis accurately in the electronic health record.基于规则和机器学习算法可在电子健康记录中准确识别系统性硬化症患者。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Dec 30;21(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2092-7.
6
A method for cohort selection of cardiovascular disease records from an electronic health record system.一种从电子健康记录系统中选择心血管疾病记录队列的方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jun;102:138-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
7
Determining diagnosis date of diabetes using structured electronic health record (EHR) data: the SEARCH for diabetes in youth study.利用结构化电子健康记录 (EHR) 数据确定糖尿病的诊断日期:青少年糖尿病研究中的 SEARCH 研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 10;21(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01394-8.
8
The validation of electronic health records in accurately identifying patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics.电子健康记录在安全网诊所中准确识别符合结直肠癌筛查条件患者方面的验证。
Fam Pract. 2016 Dec;33(6):639-643. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw065. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
9
Development and validation of an algorithm for classifying colonoscopy indication.一种用于结肠镜检查适应证分类算法的开发与验证
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):575-582.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.031. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
10
A data extraction algorithm for assessment of contraceptive counseling and provision.一种用于评估避孕咨询和提供服务的数据分析算法。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):333.e1-333.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.578. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The Trial Enrollment Diversity Dashboard for Acute Leukemia Clinical Research: Intervention Development and Cohort Analysis.急性白血病临床研究的试验入组多样性仪表板:干预开发与队列分析
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Apr;21(4):569-577. doi: 10.1200/OP.24.00319. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
Comparative Performance of Common Fecal Immunochemical Tests : A Cross-Sectional Study.常见粪便免疫化学检测的比较性能:一项横断面研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Oct;177(10):1350-1360. doi: 10.7326/M24-0080. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
3
Clock-Drawing Test as a Screening Tool for Cognitive Impairment Associated With Fecal Immunochemical Test Collection Errors.时钟绘画测试作为粪便免疫化学检测采集错误相关认知障碍的筛查工具。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Sep-Oct;20(5):452-459. doi: 10.1370/afm.2855.
4
Comparative effectiveness of five fecal immunochemical tests using colonoscopy as the gold standard: study protocol.五种粪便免疫化学检测方法与结肠镜检查对照的有效性研究:研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jul;106:106430. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106430. Epub 2021 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and cost of recruiting healthy volunteers for clinical research studies using an electronic patient portal: A randomized study.使用电子患者门户网站招募健康志愿者进行临床研究的有效性和成本:一项随机研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Dec;1(6):366-372. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.5.
2
Recruitment experience for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial: Using EMR initiatives and minimizing research infrastructure.一项实用随机对照试验的招募经验:利用电子病历举措并尽量减少研究基础设施
Clin Res Regul Aff. 2016;33(2-4):25-32. doi: 10.1080/10601333.2016.1182693. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
3
Stepwise strategies to successfully recruit diabetes patients in a large research study in Mexican population.在一项针对墨西哥人群的大型研究中成功招募糖尿病患者的逐步策略。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2017 Jun;11(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
4
Electronic Health Records Data and Metadata: Challenges for Big Data in the United States.电子健康记录数据和元数据:美国大数据面临的挑战。
Big Data. 2013 Dec;1(4):245-51. doi: 10.1089/big.2013.0023. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
5
Review and evaluation of electronic health records-driven phenotype algorithm authoring tools for clinical and translational research.用于临床和转化研究的电子健康记录驱动的表型算法创作工具的综述与评估
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Nov;22(6):1251-60. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv070. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
6
Using administrative health care system records to recruit a community-based sample for population research.利用行政医疗保健系统记录招募基于社区的人群研究样本。
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Jul;25(7):526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
7
Employing computers for the recruitment into clinical trials: a comprehensive systematic review.利用计算机进行临床试验招募:一项全面的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 1;16(7):e161. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3446.
8
Timing of procedure and compliance with outpatient endoscopy among an underserved population in an inner-city tertiary institution.在城市内的一家三级医疗机构中,服务不足人群的手术时间和门诊内窥镜检查的依从性。
Ann Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;22(7):531-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 May 8.
9
Using EHRs to integrate research with patient care: promises and challenges.利用电子健康记录将研究与患者护理相结合:前景与挑战。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):684-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000878. Epub 2012 Apr 29.
10
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an automated screening algorithm in an inpatient clinical trial.自动化筛查算法在住院临床试验中的疗效和成本效益。
Clin Trials. 2012 Apr;9(2):198-203. doi: 10.1177/1740774511434844. Epub 2012 Feb 3.

利用结肠镜检查预约安排开发用于研究对象招募的电子健康记录算法。

Electronic Health Record Algorithm Development for Research Subject Recruitment Using Colonoscopy Appointment Scheduling.

机构信息

From the Department of Family Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (JMD, KP, BTL); Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (BTL).

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;34(1):49-60. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.01.200417.

DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2021.01.200417
PMID:33452082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8185576/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Electronic health records (EHRs) are often leveraged in medical research to recruit study participants efficiently. The purpose of this study was to validate and refine the logic of an EHR algorithm for identifying potentially eligible participants for a comparative effectiveness study of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs), using colonoscopy as the standard.

METHODS

An Epic report was built to identify patients who met the eligibility criteria to recruit patients having a screening or surveillance colonoscopy. With the goal of maximizing the number of potentially eligible patients that could be recruited, researchers, with the assistance of information technology and scheduling staff, developed the algorithm for identifying potential subjects in the EHR. Two validation methods, descriptive statistics and manual verification, were used.

RESULTS

The algorithm was refined over 3 iterations leading to the following criteria being used for generating the report: Age, Appointment Made On/Cancel Date, Appointment Procedure, Contact Type, Date Range, Encounter Departments, ICD-10 codes, and Patient Type. Appointment Serial Number/Contact Serial Number were output fields that allowed the tracking of cancellations and reschedules.

CONCLUSION

Development of an EHR algorithm saved time in that most individuals ineligible for the study were excluded before patient medical record review. Running daily reports that included cancellations and rescheduled appointments allowed for maximum recruitment in a time frame appropriate for the use of the FITs. This algorithm demonstrates that refining the algorithm iteratively and adding cancellations and reschedules of colonoscopies increased the accuracy of reaching all potential patients for recruitment.

摘要

简介

电子健康记录(EHR)经常被用于医学研究中,以有效地招募研究参与者。本研究的目的是验证和完善一种用于识别粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)比较有效性研究中潜在合格参与者的 EHR 算法的逻辑,以结肠镜检查作为标准。

方法

构建了一个 Epic 报告,以确定符合招募条件的患者,这些患者正在接受筛查或监测结肠镜检查。为了最大限度地增加可招募的潜在合格患者数量,研究人员在信息技术和调度人员的协助下,在 EHR 中开发了用于识别潜在受试者的算法。使用了两种验证方法,描述性统计和手动验证。

结果

算法经过 3 次迭代进行了改进,从而确定了用于生成报告的以下标准:年龄、预约日期/取消日期、预约程序、联系方式、日期范围、就诊科室、ICD-10 代码和患者类型。预约序列号/联系序列号是输出字段,允许跟踪取消和重新安排。

结论

开发 EHR 算法节省了时间,因为在对患者病历进行审查之前,已经排除了大多数不符合研究条件的人。运行包括取消和重新安排预约的每日报告,可以在适合使用 FIT 的时间框架内实现最大招募。该算法表明,通过反复改进算法并添加结肠镜检查的取消和重新安排,可以提高招募所有潜在患者的准确性。