Harter M R, Anllo-Vento L, Wood F B, Schroeder M M
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Greensboro 27412.
Brain Cogn. 1988 Feb;7(1):115-40. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(88)90023-1.
This experiment was on event-related potential (ERP) indicants of the selective neural processing of black vs. white and letter vs. nonletter stimuli in boys (8-12 years of age) with and without a reading disability (RD) and/or attentional deficit disorder (ADD). Selective neural processing was measured by the increase or difference in ERP amplitude in response to stimuli that were relevant as compared to irrelevant to the color or letter attention task. The 52 children that participated in the study constituted four groups: 25 normal reading children (17 without ADD and 8 with ADD), and 27 RD children (11 without ADD and 16 with ADD). ERPs were recorded over the left and right occipital, central, and frontal regions. Selective neural processing due to stimulus relevance was reduced in boys with RD as compared to normal readers. This reduced selectivity was indicated by a predominantly symmetrical reduction in the magnitude of a positive difference potential over the central regions, between 300 and 360 msec, and then by a left greater than right hemisphere reduction in the magnitude of a positive difference potential over the occipital regions, at about 400 msec. Task relevance increased the within-subject and condition variability of this occipital positive component and this effect was greater for boys without than with RD, particularly over the left hemisphere. Selective neural processing due to stimulus relevance was greater in boys with ADD as compared to those without ADD. This was indicated by an increase in the magnitude of a positive difference potential between 320 and 400 msec over the central and frontal regions and a slow, late, negative difference potential between 600 and 800 msec over the central and occipital regions. These ADD effects tended to be greater over the right than left hemisphere. The unique polarity, scalp distribution, and time course of the effects of RD as compared to ADD on ERPs to relevant stimuli clearly indicated these two disorders, in part, involve different underlying brain deficits.
本实验研究了8至12岁有或无阅读障碍(RD)和/或注意力缺陷障碍(ADD)的男孩,对黑色与白色、字母与非字母刺激进行选择性神经加工的事件相关电位(ERP)指标。通过与颜色或字母注意任务相关或不相关的刺激所引起的ERP振幅增加或差异,来测量选择性神经加工。参与研究的52名儿童分为四组:25名正常阅读儿童(17名无ADD,8名有ADD),以及27名RD儿童(11名无ADD,16名有ADD)。在左、右枕叶、中央和额叶区域记录ERP。与正常阅读者相比,RD男孩因刺激相关性导致的选择性神经加工减少。这种选择性降低表现为,在300至360毫秒期间,中央区域正差异电位幅度主要呈对称性降低,然后在约400毫秒时,枕叶区域正差异电位幅度左半球大于右半球降低。任务相关性增加了该枕叶正成分在受试者内部和不同条件下的变异性,且这种效应在无RD的男孩中比有RD的男孩更大,尤其是在左半球。与无ADD的男孩相比,有ADD的男孩因刺激相关性导致的选择性神经加工更强。这表现为中央和额叶区域在320至400毫秒期间正差异电位幅度增加,以及中央和枕叶区域在600至800毫秒期间缓慢、晚期的负差异电位。这些ADD效应在右半球往往比左半球更明显。与ADD相比,RD对相关刺激的ERP影响在极性、头皮分布和时间进程上具有独特性,这清楚地表明这两种障碍部分涉及不同的潜在脑功能缺陷。