• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公民对基因组的概念:在基因组信息使用的公民论坛上相关价值观和实际意义。

Citizens' conceptions of the genome: Related values and practical implications in a citizen forum on the use of genomic information.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Monitoring, Cancer Center, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):468-477. doi: 10.1111/hex.13187. Epub 2021 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13187
PMID:33453142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8077069/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The development of large data sets, including genomic data, coupled with rapid advances in personalized medicine where citizens increasingly face complex choices about the use of their genomic information implies that citizens are essential stakeholders in genomics. They should be engaged in the ethical, legal and societal issues to produce a framework that fosters trust and allows them to guide the technology based on their values.

OBJECTIVE

This article highlights that citizens' conceptions of the human genome inform about and make sense of their main values regarding the use of genomic information, which is critical for policymakers, experts and stakeholders to understand to maintain the public support in genomics.

METHOD

Through an inductive thematic approach, we reanalysed data collected for the Belgian citizen forum, which aimed to produce recommendations for the Ministry of Public Health and other stakeholders.

RESULTS

Citizens expressed four conceptions of the genome that determined which uses of genomic information they supported: the most intimate part of individuals; 'I am more than my genome'; the individual's property vs the common good; and uncertainty and fear.

CONCLUSION

Diversity in their conceptions reveals remaining conflicts of values among citizens, mainly regarding a conception of the genome as an individual property or a common good. However, despite differing conceptions, shared values emerged such as solidarity, privacy, no genetic discrimination and the right to an open future, where individual and common interests coexist.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The panel of the citizen forum consisted of 32 citizens.

摘要

背景

大型数据集的发展,包括基因组数据,加上个性化医疗的快速发展,使公民越来越多地面临关于使用其基因组信息的复杂选择,这意味着公民是基因组学的重要利益相关者。他们应该参与到伦理、法律和社会问题中,制定一个框架,以促进信任,并使他们能够根据自己的价值观来引导技术。

目的

本文强调了公民对人类基因组的概念,这些概念为他们提供了有关使用基因组信息的主要价值观的信息和意义,这对于政策制定者、专家和利益相关者来说是至关重要的,以维持公众对基因组学的支持。

方法

通过一种归纳主题的方法,我们重新分析了为比利时公民论坛收集的数据,该论坛旨在为公共卫生部门和其他利益相关者提供建议。

结果

公民表达了四种对基因组的概念,这决定了他们支持哪些使用基因组信息:个体最私密的部分;“我不仅仅是我的基因组”;个人的财产与共同利益;以及不确定性和恐惧。

结论

他们对基因组概念的多样性揭示了公民之间仍然存在的价值观冲突,主要涉及将基因组视为个人财产还是共同利益。然而,尽管存在不同的概念,也出现了一些共同的价值观,如团结、隐私、没有基因歧视和开放未来的权利,在这些价值观中,个人和共同利益共存。

患者或公众贡献

公民论坛的小组由 32 名公民组成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91cf/8077069/537eeb9247d7/HEX-24-468-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91cf/8077069/64fad5f3c8ab/HEX-24-468-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91cf/8077069/537eeb9247d7/HEX-24-468-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91cf/8077069/64fad5f3c8ab/HEX-24-468-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91cf/8077069/537eeb9247d7/HEX-24-468-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Citizens' conceptions of the genome: Related values and practical implications in a citizen forum on the use of genomic information.公民对基因组的概念:在基因组信息使用的公民论坛上相关价值观和实际意义。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):468-477. doi: 10.1111/hex.13187. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
2
The Belgian DNA Debate: An Online Deliberative Platform on the Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues of Genomics.比利时 DNA 辩论:一个关于基因组学伦理、法律和社会问题的在线审议平台。
Public Health Genomics. 2021;24(3-4):149-159. doi: 10.1159/000515356. Epub 2021 May 5.
3
Do genomic passports leave us more vulnerable or less vulnerable? Perspectives from an online citizen engagement.基因护照会让我们变得更易受伤害还是更不易受伤害?来自在线公民参与的观点。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):83. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01580-7. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
4
Adapting a conceptual framework to engage diverse stakeholders in genomic/precision medicine research.适应概念框架,让不同利益相关者参与基因组/精准医学研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1478-1485. doi: 10.1111/hex.13486. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
5
Citizens' Literacy in Genomics: A Delphi Survey of Multidisciplinary Experts in the Field.公民基因组学素养:领域内多学科专家的德尔菲调查。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Mar 11;13(3):498. doi: 10.3390/genes13030498.
6
Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Population Health and the Public's Role in Its Governance: Perspectives From a Citizen and Expert Panel.人工智能在人口健康中的伦理影响及公众在其治理中的作用:来自公民和专家小组的观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 27;25:e44357. doi: 10.2196/44357.
7
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
8
9
Interactive effects of citizen trust and cultural values on pro-environmental behaviors: A time-lag study from Indonesia.公民信任与文化价值观对亲环境行为的交互作用:来自印度尼西亚的一项时间滞后研究。
Heliyon. 2022 Mar 18;8(3):e09139. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09139. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement.不列颠哥伦比亚省的生物样本库:通过公众参与协商讨论个性化医疗的未来。
Per Med. 2008 May;5(3):285-296. doi: 10.2217/17410541.5.3.285.

引用本文的文献

1
Publics' knowledge of, attitude to and motivation towards health-related genomics: a scoping review.公众对健康相关基因组学的知识、态度和动机:范围综述。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jul;32(7):747-758. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01547-5. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
Personal Genomes in Practice: Exploring Citizen and Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Personalized Genomic Medicine and Personal Health Data Spaces Using a Mixed-Methods Design.个人基因组实践:运用混合方法设计,探究公民和医疗保健专业人员对个性化基因组医学和个人健康数据空间的看法。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;14(4):786. doi: 10.3390/genes14040786.
3
Do genomic passports leave us more vulnerable or less vulnerable? Perspectives from an online citizen engagement.

本文引用的文献

1
Willingness to donate genomic and other medical data: results from Germany.捐赠基因组和其他医疗数据的意愿:来自德国的研究结果。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Aug;28(8):1000-1009. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0611-2. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
2
Members of the public in the USA, UK, Canada and Australia expressing genetic exceptionalism say they are more willing to donate genomic data.美国、英国、加拿大和澳大利亚的公众中表达遗传特殊主义的人表示,他们更愿意捐献基因组数据。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Apr;28(4):424-434. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0550-y. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
3
Trust in genomic data sharing among members of the general public in the UK, USA, Canada and Australia.
基因护照会让我们变得更易受伤害还是更不易受伤害?来自在线公民参与的观点。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):83. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01580-7. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
公众对英国、美国、加拿大和澳大利亚的基因组数据共享的信任。
Hum Genet. 2019 Dec;138(11-12):1237-1246. doi: 10.1007/s00439-019-02062-0. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
4
Integrating Genomics into Healthcare: A Global Responsibility.将基因组学融入医疗保健:全球的责任。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jan 3;104(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.014.
5
Fostering trust in healthcare: Participants' experiences, views, and concerns about the 100,000 genomes project.增强对医疗保健的信任:参与者对“十万基因组计划”的经历、看法及担忧
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):335-341. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.024. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
6
Attitudes of publics who are unwilling to donate DNA data for research.不愿为研究捐赠DNA数据的公众的态度。
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):316-323. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
7
Evolving health care through personal genomics.通过个人基因组学推动医疗保健发展。
Nat Rev Genet. 2017 Apr;18(4):259-267. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.162. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
8
Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.近7000名医疗专业人员、基因组研究人员和公众对测序研究中偶然发现结果反馈的态度。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;24(1):21-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.58. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
9
The privacy-reciprocity connection in biobanking: comparing German with UK strategies.生物样本库中的隐私与互惠关系:德国与英国策略之比较
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(5):272-84. doi: 10.1159/000336671. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
10
"If I could in a small way help": motivations for and beliefs about sample donation for genetic research.“若我能略尽绵薄之力”:基因研究样本捐赠的动机与信念
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Jun;6(2):57-70. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.57.