• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人基因组实践:运用混合方法设计,探究公民和医疗保健专业人员对个性化基因组医学和个人健康数据空间的看法。

Personal Genomes in Practice: Exploring Citizen and Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Personalized Genomic Medicine and Personal Health Data Spaces Using a Mixed-Methods Design.

机构信息

Health, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;14(4):786. doi: 10.3390/genes14040786.

DOI:10.3390/genes14040786
PMID:37107544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10137790/
Abstract

Ongoing health challenges, such as the increased global burden of chronic disease, are increasingly answered by calls for personalized approaches to healthcare. Genomic medicine, a vital component of these personalization strategies, is applied in risk assessment, prevention, prognostication, and therapeutic targeting. However, several practical, ethical, and technological challenges remain. Across Europe, Personal Health Data Space (PHDS) projects are under development aiming to establish patient-centered, interoperable data ecosystems balancing data access, control, and use for individual citizens to complement the research and commercial focus of the European Health Data Space provisions. The current study explores healthcare users' and health care professionals' perspectives on personalized genomic medicine and PHDS solutions, in casu the Personal Genetic Locker (PGL). A mixed-methods design was used, including surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Several meta-themes were generated from the data: (i) participants were interested in genomic information; (ii) participants valued data control, robust infrastructure, and sharing data with non-commercial stakeholders; (iii) autonomy was a central concern for all participants; (iv) institutional and interpersonal trust were highly significant for genomic medicine; and (v) participants encouraged the implementation of PHDSs since PHDSs were thought to promote the use of genomic data and enhance patients' control over their data. To conclude, we formulated several facilitators to implement genomic medicine in healthcare based on the perspectives of a diverse set of stakeholders.

摘要

目前存在一些实际的、伦理的和技术方面的挑战。在整个欧洲,个人健康数据空间(PHDS)项目正在开发中,旨在建立以患者为中心、可互操作的数据生态系统,平衡个人公民的数据访问、控制和使用,以补充欧洲健康数据空间规定的研究和商业重点。本研究探讨了医疗保健用户和医疗保健专业人员对个性化基因组医学和 PHDS 解决方案(即个人遗传库(PGL))的看法。采用了混合方法设计,包括调查、访谈和焦点小组。从数据中生成了几个元主题:(i)参与者对基因组信息感兴趣;(ii)参与者重视数据控制、稳健的基础设施以及与非商业利益相关者共享数据;(iii)自主性是所有参与者关注的核心;(iv)机构和人际信任对基因组医学非常重要;(v)参与者鼓励实施 PHDS,因为 PHDS 被认为可以促进基因组数据的使用,并增强患者对其数据的控制。总之,我们根据一组多样化的利益相关者的观点,制定了实施基因组医学的几个促进因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e59/10137790/bc5b377d0450/genes-14-00786-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e59/10137790/a0c53811fd3b/genes-14-00786-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e59/10137790/8fde982f594b/genes-14-00786-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e59/10137790/bc5b377d0450/genes-14-00786-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e59/10137790/a0c53811fd3b/genes-14-00786-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e59/10137790/8fde982f594b/genes-14-00786-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e59/10137790/bc5b377d0450/genes-14-00786-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Personal Genomes in Practice: Exploring Citizen and Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Personalized Genomic Medicine and Personal Health Data Spaces Using a Mixed-Methods Design.个人基因组实践:运用混合方法设计,探究公民和医疗保健专业人员对个性化基因组医学和个人健康数据空间的看法。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;14(4):786. doi: 10.3390/genes14040786.
2
End Users' and Other Stakeholders' Needs and Requirements in the Development of a Personalized Integrated Care Platform (PROCare4Life) for Older People With Dementia or Parkinson Disease: Mixed Methods Study.为患有痴呆症或帕金森病的老年人开发个性化综合护理平台(PROCare4Life)时终端用户及其他利益相关者的需求和要求:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 30;6(11):e39199. doi: 10.2196/39199.
3
Primary care providers' experiences with and perceptions of personalized genomic medicine.初级医疗服务提供者对个性化基因组医学的体验与看法。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Oct;62(10):e626-e635.
4
Testing and Practical Implementation of a User-Friendly Personalized and Long-Term Electronic Informed Consent Prototype in Clinical Research: Mixed Methods Study.临床研究中用户友好型个性化和长期电子知情同意原型的测试和实际应用:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 19;25:e46306. doi: 10.2196/46306.
5
Personal genomic information management and personalized medicine: challenges, current solutions, and roles of HIM professionals.个人基因组信息管理与个性化医疗:挑战、当前解决方案以及健康信息管理专业人员的作用
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2014 Apr 1;11(Spring):1c. eCollection 2014.
6
Critical components of genomic medicine practice for non-genetics healthcare professionals: Genetic counselors' perspectives and implications for medical education.基因组医学实践对非遗传学医疗保健专业人员的关键要求:遗传咨询师的观点及其对医学教育的意义。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Aug;32(4):798-811. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1689. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
7
Improving access to healthcare for paediatric sickle cell disease patients: a qualitative study on healthcare professionals' views.改善小儿镰状细胞病患者的医疗服务可及性:一项关于医疗专业人员观点的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 12;21(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06245-2.
8
Delivering an iterative Communication Partner Training programme to multidisciplinary healthcare professionals: A pilot implementation study and process evaluation.为多学科医疗保健专业人员提供迭代沟通伙伴培训计划:试点实施研究和过程评估。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):620-636. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12618. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
9
Personal Genome Project UK (PGP-UK): a research and citizen science hybrid project in support of personalized medicine.英国个人基因组计划(PGP-UK):支持个性化医疗的研究与公民科学混合项目。
BMC Med Genomics. 2018 Nov 27;11(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12920-018-0423-1.
10
Integrating China in the international consortium for personalised medicine. a position paper on healthcare professionals' education and citizens' empowerment in personalised medicine.将中国纳入个体化医学国际联合会。关于个体化医学中医疗保健专业人员教育和公民赋权的立场文件。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04420-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Public attitudes towards personal health data sharing in long-term epidemiological research: a Citizen Science approach in the KORA study.公众对长期流行病学研究中个人健康数据共享的态度:科勒研究中的公民科学方法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 26;24(1):2317. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19730-0.
2
Comment on Australian public perspectives on genomic data governance by Lynch et al. in the EJHG.对林奇等人发表于《欧洲人类遗传学杂志》上关于澳大利亚公众对基因组数据治理观点的评论。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Mar;32(3):251-252. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01416-7. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Compromises and Asymmetries in the European Health Data Space.欧洲健康数据空间中的妥协与非对称。
Eur J Health Law. 2022 Oct 27;30(3):345-363. doi: 10.1163/15718093-bja10099.
2
Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a researcher.迈向主题分析的良好实践:避免常见问题并成为一名研究者。
Int J Transgend Health. 2022 Oct 25;24(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597. eCollection 2023.
3
Physician Perception of the Importance of Medical Genetics and Genomics in Medical Education and Clinical Practice.
医生对医学遗传学和基因组学在医学教育和临床实践中重要性的认知。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2143920. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2143920.
4
Personal Health Train Architecture with Dynamic Cloud Staging.具有动态云部署的个人健康训练架构
SN Comput Sci. 2023;4(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s42979-022-01422-4. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
5
The European Health Data Space fails to bridge digital divides.欧洲健康数据空间未能弥合数字鸿沟。
BMJ. 2022 Jul 8;378:e071913. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071913.
6
Participants' Preferences and Reasons for Wanting Feedback of Individual Genetic Research Results From an HIV-TB Genomic Study: A Case Study From Botswana.参与者对从 HIV-TB 基因组研究中获得个人遗传研究结果反馈的偏好和原因:来自博茨瓦纳的案例研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2021 Dec;16(5):525-536. doi: 10.1177/15562646211043985.
7
Patient data ownership: who owns your health?患者数据所有权:谁拥有你的健康信息?
J Law Biosci. 2021 Oct 1;8(2):lsab023. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsab023. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
8
Examining the power of the social imaginary through competing narratives of data ownership in health research.通过健康研究中数据所有权的相互竞争的叙事来审视社会想象的力量。
J Law Biosci. 2021 Feb 4;8(2):lsaa068. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa068. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
9
Co-Design for People-Centred Care Digital Solutions: A Literature Review.以患者为中心的护理数字解决方案的协同设计:文献综述
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Apr 30;21(2):16. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5573.
10
Ethical Principles, Constraints and Opportunities in Clinical Proteomics.临床蛋白质组学中的伦理原则、限制因素与机遇
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2021 Jan 14;20:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100046.