Department of Otolaryngology Head, Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Dec;278(12):4767-4773. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06608-9. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
To validate a smartphone-based Rinne test employing the vibration application of mobile telephones.
Prospective controlled clinical study.
Tertiary referral medical center.
Twenty consecutive patients hospitalized in the otolaryngology department of a tertiary medical center due to unilateral hearing loss (HL study group), and 30 consecutive inpatients on the same ward who had no otological history (controls) were enrolled. Each participant underwent the traditional 512 Hz tuning fork-based Rinne test, as well as a smartphone-based Rinne test by means of a single uncovered smartphone with a vibration application. The test results were compared to those of formal audiometry.
The overall agreement between the traditional Rinne test and the smartphone-based test was 98%. The Sensitivity was 85% for both tests, specificity was 90% and 93% for smartphone and tuning fork tests, respectively. The smartphone-based Rinne test could correctly discriminate between patients with an air-bone gap ≥ 25 dB at 512 Hz from patients with a lower or no air-bone gap at 512 Hz. The smartphone-based Rinne could not evaluate two patients with a moderately severe/severe sensorineural hearing loss due to their inability to detect the vibrations.
A smartphone-based Rinne test was validated for the detection of an air-bone gap ≥ 25 dB at 512 Hz in the clinical setting. The validity of patient-operated smartphone-based Rinne test awaits further study.
2B.
验证一种基于智能手机的林内测试,该测试利用移动电话的振动应用。
前瞻性对照临床研究。
三级转诊医疗中心。
连续纳入 20 例因单侧听力损失(HL 研究组)而住院于耳鼻喉科的连续患者,以及 30 例在同一病房无耳病史的连续住院患者(对照组)。每位参与者均接受传统的 512 Hz 音叉林内测试和基于单个未覆盖智能手机的智能手机林内测试,该智能手机具有振动应用。将测试结果与正式听力测试进行比较。
传统林内测试与基于智能手机的测试之间的总体一致性为 98%。两种测试的敏感性均为 85%,特异性分别为智能手机和音叉测试的 90%和 93%。基于智能手机的林内测试可正确区分 512 Hz 时气骨间隙≥25 dB 的患者与气骨间隙较小或无气骨间隙的患者。基于智能手机的林内测试无法评估因无法检测到振动而导致中重度/重度感音神经性听力损失的 2 例患者。
在临床环境中,基于智能手机的林内测试可用于检测 512 Hz 时气骨间隙≥25 dB。有待进一步研究患者操作的基于智能手机的林内测试的有效性。
2B。