• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生技术评估中公共价值的体现,以告知资金决策:以澳大利亚国家资金机构为例。

The representation of public values in health technology assessment to inform funding decisions: the case of Australia's national funding bodies.

机构信息

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia.

School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Jan 18;37:e22. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320002238.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462320002238
PMID:33455592
Abstract

Over the past few years, there has been an increasing recognition of the value of public involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) to ensure the legitimacy and fairness of public funding decisions [Street J, Stafinski T, Lopes E, Menon D. Defining the role of the public in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and HTA-informed decision-making processes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36:87-95]. However, important challenges remain, in particular, how to reorient HTA to reflect public priorities. In a recent international survey of thirty HTA agencies conducted by the International Network of Agencies for HTA (INAHTA), public engagement in HTA was listed as one of the "Top 10" challenges for HTA agencies [O'Rourke B, Werko SS, Merlin T, Huang LY, Schuller T. The "Top 10" challenges for health technology assessment: INAHTA viewpoint. Int J Technol Assess. 2020;36:1-4].Historically, Australia has been at the forefront of the application of HTA for assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new health technologies to inform public funding decisions. However, current HTA processes in Australia lack meaningful public inputs. Using Australia as an example, we describe this important limitation and discuss the potential impact of this gap on the health system and future directions.

摘要

在过去的几年中,人们越来越认识到公众参与健康技术评估(HTA)的价值,以确保公共资金决策的合法性和公正性[Street J, Stafinski T, Lopes E, Menon D. 定义公众在健康技术评估(HTA)和 HTA 决策过程中的作用。国际卫生技术评估杂志. 2020;36:87-95]。然而,仍然存在重要的挑战,特别是如何重新调整 HTA 以反映公众的优先事项。在最近由国际卫生技术评估机构网络(INAHTA)对三十家 HTA 机构进行的国际调查中,公众参与 HTA 被列为 HTA 机构的“十大”挑战之一[O'Rourke B, Werko SS, Merlin T, Huang LY, Schuller T. 健康技术评估的“十大”挑战:INAHTA 观点。国际卫生技术评估杂志. 2020;36:1-4]。

澳大利亚在应用 HTA 评估新的卫生技术的有效性和成本效益以告知公共资金决策方面一直处于领先地位。然而,澳大利亚目前的 HTA 流程缺乏有意义的公众投入。我们以澳大利亚为例,描述了这一重要的局限性,并讨论了这一差距对卫生系统和未来方向的潜在影响。

相似文献

1
The representation of public values in health technology assessment to inform funding decisions: the case of Australia's national funding bodies.卫生技术评估中公共价值的体现,以告知资金决策:以澳大利亚国家资金机构为例。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Jan 18;37:e22. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320002238.
2
Health technology assessment in Australia: a role for clinical registries?澳大利亚的卫生技术评估:临床注册登记处能发挥作用吗?
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Mar;41(1):19-25. doi: 10.1071/AH15109.
3
Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Case Studies: Factors Influencing Divergent HTA Reimbursement Recommendations in Australia, Canada, England, and Scotland.卫生技术评估(HTA)案例研究:影响澳大利亚、加拿大、英格兰和苏格兰卫生技术评估报销建议分歧的因素
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):320-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
4
The impact of the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme, 2003-13: a multimethod evaluation.2003 - 2013年英国国家卫生研究院卫生技术评估项目的影响:多方法评估
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Aug;19(67):1-291. doi: 10.3310/hta19670.
5
INSIGHTS FROM THE FRONT LINES: A COLLECTION OF STORIES OF HTA IMPACT FROM INAHTA MEMBER AGENCIES.一线观察:来自 INAHTA 成员机构的 HTA 影响故事集。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(4):409-410. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317001076.
6
Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study.公众参与卫生技术评估决策的偏好:一项混合方法研究的方案
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Jul 14;15:52. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0176-0.
7
The 'Top 10' Challenges for Health Technology Assessment: INAHTA Viewpoint.十大健康技术评估挑战:INAHTA 观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36(1):1-4. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000825. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
8
Community views and perspectives on public engagement in health technology assessment decision making.社区对公众参与卫生技术评估决策的看法和观点。
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Mar;41(1):68-74. doi: 10.1071/AH15221.
9
Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe.全球卫生技术评估机构对循证审议流程的使用。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Jan 1;9(1):27-33. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.72.
10
The Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System (RedETS).西班牙国家卫生系统卫生技术评估和服务机构网络(RedETS)。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019 Jan;35(3):176-180. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000205. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Value and Implementation of Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in Health Technology Assessment for Japan: implications from systematic searches.患者及公众参与和介入日本卫生技术评估的价值与实施:系统检索的启示
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Feb 28;41(1):e14. doi: 10.1017/S026646232500008X.
2
Population-based integrated care funding values and guiding principles: An empirical qualitative study.基于人群的综合护理资金价值与指导原则:一项实证定性研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 23;10(3):e24904. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24904. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
3
Expanding health technology assessment towards broader value: Ireland as a case study.
拓展卫生技术评估以实现更广泛的价值:以爱尔兰为例。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 May 2;39(1):e26. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000235.
4
Public engagement in health technology assessment in Brazil: the case of the public consultation on National Clinical Guidelines for Care in Normal Birth.巴西卫生技术评估中的公众参与:国家正常分娩护理临床指南公开咨询的案例。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):1825. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11855-w.