• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用可外部推广的机器学习算法预测急诊科患者进展为感染性休克的情况。

Predicting Progression to Septic Shock in the Emergency Department Using an Externally Generalizable Machine-Learning Algorithm.

作者信息

Wardi Gabriel, Carlile Morgan, Holder Andre, Shashikumar Supreeth, Hayden Stephen R, Nemati Shamim

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Apr;77(4):395-406. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.11.007. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.11.007
PMID:33455840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8554871/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Machine-learning algorithms allow improved prediction of sepsis syndromes in the emergency department (ED), using data from electronic medical records. Transfer learning, a new subfield of machine learning, allows generalizability of an algorithm across clinical sites. We aim to validate the Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert for the prediction of delayed septic shock in a cohort of patients treated in the ED and demonstrate the feasibility of transfer learning to improve external validity at a second site.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study using data from greater than 180,000 patients from 2 academic medical centers between 2014 and 2019, using multiple definitions of sepsis. The Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert algorithm was trained with 40 input variables at the development site to predict delayed septic shock (occurring greater than 4 hours after ED triage) at various prediction windows. We then validated the algorithm at a second site, using transfer learning to demonstrate generalizability of the algorithm.

RESULTS

We identified 9,354 patients with severe sepsis, of whom 723 developed septic shock at least 4 hours after triage. The Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert algorithm demonstrated excellent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (>0.8) at 8 and 12 hours for the prediction of delayed septic shock. Transfer learning significantly improved the test characteristics of the Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert algorithm and yielded comparable performance at the validation site.

CONCLUSION

The Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert algorithm accurately predicted the development of delayed septic shock. The use of transfer learning allowed significantly improved external validity and generalizability at a second site. Future prospective studies are indicated to evaluate the clinical utility of this model.

摘要

研究目的

机器学习算法可利用电子病历数据改善对急诊科脓毒症综合征的预测。迁移学习作为机器学习的一个新子领域,可使算法在不同临床场所具有通用性。我们旨在验证人工智能脓毒症专家系统对急诊科治疗的一组患者中延迟性感染性休克的预测能力,并证明迁移学习在第二个场所提高外部有效性的可行性。

方法

这是一项观察性队列研究,使用了2014年至2019年期间来自2个学术医疗中心的超过180,000名患者的数据,采用了多种脓毒症定义。人工智能脓毒症专家算法在开发场所使用40个输入变量进行训练,以预测不同预测窗口下的延迟性感染性休克(在急诊科分诊后4小时以上发生)。然后我们在第二个场所验证该算法,使用迁移学习来证明该算法的通用性。

结果

我们识别出9354例严重脓毒症患者,其中723例在分诊后至少4小时发生感染性休克。人工智能脓毒症专家算法在预测延迟性感染性休克时,在8小时和12小时的受试者操作特征曲线下面积表现出色(>0.8)。迁移学习显著改善了人工智能脓毒症专家算法的测试特征,并在验证场所产生了可比的性能。

结论

人工智能脓毒症专家算法准确预测了延迟性感染性休克的发生。迁移学习的使用显著提高了第二个场所的外部有效性和通用性。未来需要进行前瞻性研究来评估该模型的临床实用性。

相似文献

1
Predicting Progression to Septic Shock in the Emergency Department Using an Externally Generalizable Machine-Learning Algorithm.使用可外部推广的机器学习算法预测急诊科患者进展为感染性休克的情况。
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Apr;77(4):395-406. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.11.007. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalized and real time hemodynamic management in critical care using Dynamic Cohort Ensemble Learning (DynaCEL).在重症监护中使用动态队列集成学习(DynaCEL)进行个性化实时血流动力学管理。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 24;8(1):474. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01863-0.
2
Mortality and antibiotic timing in deep learning-derived surviving sepsis campaign risk groups: a multicenter study.深度学习衍生的脓毒症存活运动风险组中的死亡率与抗生素使用时机:一项多中心研究
Crit Care. 2025 Jul 14;29(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05493-6.
3
Impact of analytical bias on machine learning models for sepsis prediction using laboratory data.分析偏倚对使用实验室数据进行脓毒症预测的机器学习模型的影响。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2025-0491.
4
AI-driven healthcare: Fairness in AI healthcare: A survey.人工智能驱动的医疗保健:人工智能医疗保健中的公平性:一项调查。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 May 20;4(5):e0000864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000864. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Unreasonable effectiveness of training AI models locally.在本地训练人工智能模型的不合理有效性。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Aug 18;34(9):567-569. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018543.
6
Early Prediction of Septic Shock in Emergency Department Using Serum Metabolites.利用血清代谢物在急诊科对感染性休克进行早期预测。
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2025 Jun 4;36(6):1264-1276. doi: 10.1021/jasms.5c00009. Epub 2025 May 9.
7
Mortality and Antibiotic Timing in Deep Learning-Derived Surviving Sepsis Campaign Risk Groups: A Multicenter Study.深度学习衍生的脓毒症存活运动风险组中的死亡率与抗生素使用时机:一项多中心研究
Res Sq. 2025 Apr 1:rs.3.rs-6123541. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6123541/v1.
8
The role of artificial intelligence in sepsis in the Emergency Department: a narrative review.人工智能在急诊科脓毒症中的作用:一项叙述性综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2025 Feb 28;13(1):4. doi: 10.21037/atm-24-150. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
9
A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence research in critical illness: a quantitative approach and visualization study.危重症人工智能研究的文献计量分析:一种定量方法与可视化研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 4;12:1553970. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1553970. eCollection 2025.
10
Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management: An Overview for Clinicians.脓毒症管理中的人工智能:临床医生概述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 6;14(1):286. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010286.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension.涉及人工智能干预的临床试验方案指南:SPIRIT-AI 扩展。
Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1351-1363. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1037-7. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
Retrospective Observational Study of the Clinical Performance Characteristics of a Machine Learning Approach to Early Sepsis Identification.机器学习方法用于早期脓毒症识别的临床性能特征的回顾性观察研究
Crit Care Explor. 2019 Sep 13;1(9):e0046. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000046. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.机器学习在脓毒症预测中的应用:诊断试验准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Mar;46(3):383-400. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05872-y. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
Early Prediction of Sepsis From Clinical Data: The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019.从临床数据中早期预测脓毒症:PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology 挑战赛 2019。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):210-217. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004145.
5
Challenges to the Reproducibility of Machine Learning Models in Health Care.医疗保健领域机器学习模型可重复性面临的挑战。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 28;323(4):305-306. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20866.
6
Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.借助电子健康记录实现可扩展且准确的深度学习。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 8;1:18. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1. eCollection 2018.
7
Development and Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model for the Early Identification of Patients at Risk for Sepsis.开发和评估一种机器学习模型,用于早期识别脓毒症高危患者。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;73(4):334-344. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.11.036. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
8
Privacy in the age of medical big data.医疗大数据时代的隐私问题。
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):37-43. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0272-7. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
9
Variability in determining sepsis time zero and bundle compliance rates for the centers for medicare and medicaid services SEP-1 measure.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心 SEP-1 衡量标准中确定脓毒症时间零点和捆绑包依从率的变异性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;39(8):994-996. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.134. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
10
Opportunities and challenges in developing deep learning models using electronic health records data: a systematic review.利用电子健康记录数据开发深度学习模型的机遇与挑战:系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Oct 1;25(10):1419-1428. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy068.