Suppr超能文献

患者咨询委员会在健康研究中的作用:来自加拿大两个省级委员会的经验教训。

The Role of Patient Advisory Councils in Health Research: Lessons From Two Provincial Councils in Canada.

作者信息

Warren Mike, Leamon Toni, Hall Amanda, Twells Laurie, Street Catherine, Stordy Allan, Majumdar Kakali, Breault Lorraine, Fiest Kirsten, Rasiah Jananee, Santana Maria, Etchegary Holly

机构信息

NL Support Unit, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.

NL Support Unit and Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):898-905. doi: 10.1177/2374373520909598. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

Abstract

This article describes two patient advisory councils (PACs) in Canada in order to contribute to the limited evidence base on how they might facilitate patient engagement in health research. Specifically, members of PACs from Newfoundland and Labrador and Alberta describe their councils' governance structure, primary functions, creation and composition, and recount specific research-related activities with which they have been involved. Key challenges of these councils and facilitators of their use are also presented. Finally, members from both councils recount lessons learned and offer suggestions for others interested in advisory councils as a mechanism for patient engagement in any health research project. Members believe patient engagement can result in better quality research and encourage decision makers and researchers to utilize patients' valuable input to inform health system changes and drive priorities at a policy level.

摘要

本文介绍了加拿大的两个患者咨询委员会(PACs),以补充关于它们如何促进患者参与健康研究的有限证据基础。具体而言,来自纽芬兰与拉布拉多省以及艾伯塔省的PACs成员描述了其委员会的治理结构、主要职能、创建与组成,并讲述了他们参与的具体研究相关活动。还介绍了这些委员会面临的关键挑战及其使用的促进因素。最后,两个委员会的成员都讲述了经验教训,并为那些对咨询委员会作为患者参与任何健康研究项目的一种机制感兴趣的人提供了建议。成员们认为,患者参与能够带来质量更高的研究,并鼓励决策者和研究人员利用患者的宝贵意见,为卫生系统变革提供信息,并在政策层面推动工作重点。

相似文献

1
The Role of Patient Advisory Councils in Health Research: Lessons From Two Provincial Councils in Canada.
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):898-905. doi: 10.1177/2374373520909598. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
6
Patient Engagement in Community Health Center Leadership: How Does it Happen?
J Community Health. 2018 Dec;43(6):1069-1074. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0523-z.
7
Success of Patient and Family Advisory Councils: The Importance of Metrics.
J Patient Exp. 2023 Apr 10;10:23743735231167972. doi: 10.1177/23743735231167972. eCollection 2023.
9
Lessons Learned from a Systems Approach to Engaging Patients and Families in Patient Safety Transformation.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Mar;46(3):158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
10
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Patient Perspectives in Treatment and Management of Care in Asthma.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Aug 9;19:2353-2361. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S522436. eCollection 2025.
3
Establishing a peer advisory board in a mental health ethics research group - challenges, benefits, facilitators and lessons learned.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 28;16:1516996. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1516996. eCollection 2025.
4
Use of Hospital Patient and Family Advisory Councils: A Scoping Study.
J Patient Exp. 2025 Feb 9;12:23743735251316995. doi: 10.1177/23743735251316995. eCollection 2025.
6
Framework of the strengths and challenges of clinically integrated trials: An expert panel report.
Am Heart J. 2024 Sep;275:62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient involvement in medical research: what patients and physicians learn from each other.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jan 24;14(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0969-1.
2
Unpacking the black box of improvement.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Apr 20;30(suppl_1):15-19. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy009.
3
Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4.
5
Recruiting patients as partners in health research: a qualitative descriptive study.
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 21;3:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0067-x. eCollection 2017.
6
Learning to work together - lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement.
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 9;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0051-x. eCollection 2017.
7
An empirically based conceptual framework for fostering meaningful patient engagement in research.
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):396-406. doi: 10.1111/hex.12635. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
8
Emerging Guidelines for Patient Engagement in Research.
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):481-486. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
9
Patient and Citizen Innovation Council in family practice.
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Feb;63(2):e102-e106.
10
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验