• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient involvement in medical research: what patients and physicians learn from each other.患者参与医学研究:患者和医生从彼此身上学到的东西。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jan 24;14(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0969-1.
2
The dynamic nature of patient engagement within a Canadian patient-oriented kidney health research network: Perspectives of researchers and patient partners.加拿大以患者为导向的肾脏健康研究网络中患者参与的动态性质:研究人员和患者伙伴的观点。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):905-918. doi: 10.1111/hex.13716. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
3
Engaging patients and family members to design and implement patient-centered kidney disease research.让患者和家庭成员参与设计和实施以患者为中心的肾脏疾病研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Nov 1;6(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00237-y.
4
Learning to "Swim" with the Experts: Experiences of Two Patient Co-Investigators for a Project Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.与专家一同“畅游”:两位患者共同研究者参与由患者为中心的结果研究机构资助项目的经历
Perm J. 2016 Spring;20(2):85-8. doi: 10.7812/TPP/15-162. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
5
Patient and family engagement in incident investigations: exploring hospital manager and incident investigators' experiences and challenges.患者及其家属参与事件调查:探索医院管理者和事件调查员的经验和挑战。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Oct;23(4):252-261. doi: 10.1177/1355819618788586. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
6
What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams?患者及其家属作为研究团队的合作伙伴,什么样的参与才算有意义?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jul;23(3):158-167. doi: 10.1177/1355819618762960. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
7
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
8
Patient Governance in a Patient-Powered Research Network for Adult Rheumatologic Conditions.患者主导的成人风湿性疾病研究网络中的患者治理。
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S16-S21. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000814.
9
Learning from remote decentralised clinical trial experiences: A qualitative analysis of interviews with trial personnel, patient representatives and other stakeholders.从远程去中心化临床试验经验中学习:对试验人员、患者代表和其他利益相关者进行访谈的定性分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Mar;88(3):1031-1042. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15003. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
A study of implementation factors for a novel approach to clinical trials: constructs for consideration in the coordination of direct-to-patient online-based medical research.一种新的临床试验方法实施因素的研究:直接面向患者的在线医学研究协调中需要考虑的构建。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02352-w.
2
Setting the international research agenda for sarcomas with patients and carers: results of phase II of the Sarcoma Patient Advocacy Global Network (SPAGN) priority setting partnership.为肉瘤患者和照护者设定国际研究议程:肉瘤患者倡导全球网络(SPAGN)优先事项设定伙伴关系第二阶段的结果。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):962. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12732-6.
3
Collaborating with cancer patients and informal caregivers in a European study on quality of life: protocol to embed patient and public involvement within the EUonQoL project.在一项关于生活质量的欧洲研究中与癌症患者及非正式照护者合作:将患者和公众参与纳入欧盟生活质量(EUonQoL)项目的方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 11;10(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00597-9.
4
Patient research partner involvement in rheumatology research: a systematic literature review informing the 2023 updated EULAR recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners.患者研究伙伴参与风湿病学研究:系统文献回顾为 2023 年更新的 EULAR 患者研究伙伴参与建议提供信息。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Sep 30;83(10):1268-1277. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225567.
5
"We have dealt with so much. There's more coming?": Improving Knowledge About Brain Health in Adults Living With Congenital Heart Disease.“我们已经经历了这么多。还有更多要来?”:提高先天性心脏病成年患者的脑健康知识水平
CJC Pediatr Congenit Heart Dis. 2023 Oct 31;3(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cjcpc.2023.10.010. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Nomenclature of real patients in health professional education by role and engagement: a narrative literature review.基于角色与参与度的卫生专业教育中真实患者的命名:一项叙述性文献综述
Can Med Educ J. 2022 Sep 1;13(5):69-76. doi: 10.36834/cmej.72429. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
The experience of patient partners in research: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.患者伙伴参与研究的经历:一项定性系统评价与主题综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Oct 3;8(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00388-0.
8
Setting the international research agenda for sarcoma together with patients and carers: first results of the Sarcoma Patient EuroNet (SPAEN) priority setting partnership.与患者和照护者共同制定肉瘤国际研究议程:肉瘤患者欧洲网络(SPAEN)优先事项设定伙伴关系的初步结果。
ESMO Open. 2022 Jun;7(3):100509. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100509. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
9
Patient involvement in rare diseases research: a scoping review of the literature and mixed method evaluation of Norwegian researchers' experiences and perceptions.患者参与罕见病研究:文献范围综述及对挪威研究人员经验和看法的混合方法评估。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 May 31;17(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02357-y.
10
Self-Reported Data and Physician-Reported Data in Patients With Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: Comparative Analysis.嗜酸性肉芽肿性多血管炎患者的自我报告数据与医生报告数据:对比分析
Interact J Med Res. 2022 May 25;11(1):e27273. doi: 10.2196/27273.

本文引用的文献

1
The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network.罕见病临床研究网络中患者权益倡导组织与临床研究人员的合作关系。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 May 18;11(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0445-8.
2
The Language of Engagement: "Aha!" Moments from Engaging Patients and Community Partners in Two Pilot Projects of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.参与的语言:患者为中心的结果研究所两个试点项目中与患者和社区合作伙伴互动的“顿悟”时刻。
Perm J. 2016 Spring;20(2):89-92. doi: 10.7812/TPP/15-123. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
3
The involvement of patient organisations in rare disease research: a mixed methods study in Australia.患者组织在罕见病研究中的参与情况:澳大利亚的一项混合方法研究
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Jan 12;11:2. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0382-6.
4
A systematic review of approaches for engaging patients for research on rare diseases.关于让患者参与罕见病研究的方法的系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug;29 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S788-800. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2895-9.
5
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.患者参与研究:一项系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.
6
Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework.患者及服务使用者参与研究:一项系统综述与综合框架
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1151-66. doi: 10.1111/hex.12090. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
7
A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research.一种新的利益相关者参与以患者为中心的结局研究的分类法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):985-91. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2037-1. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
8
How best to engage patients, doctors, and other stakeholders in designing comparative effectiveness studies.如何最好地让患者、医生和其他利益相关者参与设计比较效果研究。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1834-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0675.
9
Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation.患者在健康技术评估中的观点:获得稳健证据和公平审议的途径。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010 Jul;26(3):334-40. doi: 10.1017/S0266462310000395.
10
Participatory action research.参与式行动研究
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Oct;60(10):854-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.028662.

患者参与医学研究:患者和医生从彼此身上学到的东西。

Patient involvement in medical research: what patients and physicians learn from each other.

机构信息

Vasculitis Foundation, Kansas City, MO, USA.

Organizational Dynamics, Liberal and Professional Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jan 24;14(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0969-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13023-018-0969-1
PMID:30678705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6346573/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in actively involving patients in the process of medical research to help ensure research is relevant and important to both researchers and people affected by the disease under study. This project examined the recently formed Vasculitis Patient-Powered Research Network (VPPRN), a rare disease research network, to better understand what investigators and patients learned from working on research teams together.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted by phone with patients, physician/PhD-investigators, and study managers/staff who participated in the network. The question guiding the interviews and observational analysis was: "What have investigators and patients learned about working together while working on VPPRN teams?" Interview transcripts were analyzed in combination with observations from multiple in-person and telephone meetings.

RESULTS

Transcripts and notes were reviewed and coded from 22 interviews conducted among 13 patient-partners, 5 study managers/staff, and 4 MD or PhD-investigators, and 6 in-person and 42 telephone/web-conference meetings. Patient-partners and investigators characterized their working relationships with one another, what they learned from their collaborations, and provided recommendations for future teams of patient-partners and investigators. Major themes included the great benefits of communicating about activities, being open to listening to each group member, and the importance of setting reasonable expectations.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct engagement in research design and development by patient-partners and co-learning between investigators and patient-partners can result in a positive and productive working relationship for all members of a medical research team. This bi-directional engagement directly benefits and impacts research design, participant recruitment to studies, and study subject retention.

摘要

背景

越来越多的人对积极让患者参与医疗研究的过程感兴趣,以帮助确保研究对研究人员和受研究疾病影响的人都具有相关性和重要性。本项目研究了最近成立的血管炎患者主导的研究网络(Vasculitis Patient-Powered Research Network,VPPRN),这是一个罕见病研究网络,以更好地了解研究人员和患者在共同研究团队中工作时所学到的知识。

方法

通过电话对参与该网络的患者、医师/博士研究员以及研究经理/工作人员进行了定性访谈。指导访谈和观察分析的问题是:“在 VPPRN 团队中工作时,研究人员和患者对共同工作有什么了解?”访谈记录与来自多次面对面和电话会议的观察结果相结合进行分析。

结果

对 13 名患者伙伴、5 名研究经理/工作人员、4 名医学博士或博士研究员中的 22 名进行了访谈,记录了访谈记录和笔记,并进行了审查和编码,并进行了 6 次面对面会议和 42 次电话/网络会议。患者伙伴和研究人员描述了他们之间的工作关系、从合作中学到的知识,并为未来的患者伙伴和研究人员团队提供了建议。主要主题包括交流活动的巨大好处、对倾听每个小组成员的开放态度以及设定合理期望的重要性。

结论

患者伙伴直接参与研究设计和开发,以及研究人员和患者伙伴之间的共同学习,可以为医疗研究团队的所有成员建立积极和富有成效的工作关系。这种双向参与直接有利于和影响研究设计、研究参与者的招募以及研究对象的保留。