• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

招募患者作为健康研究的合作伙伴:一项定性描述性研究。

Recruiting patients as partners in health research: a qualitative descriptive study.

作者信息

Vat Lidewij Eva, Ryan Devonne, Etchegary Holly

机构信息

Training and Capacity Lead, NL SUPPORT Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Faculty of Medicine, Room 4M104, St. John's, NF A1B 3V6 Canada.

Research Assistant/ PhD Candidate, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Suite 4M120, St. John's, NF A1B 3V6 Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 21;3:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0067-x. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-017-0067-x
PMID:29062540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5611573/
Abstract

PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY

Increasingly, funders and researchers want to partner with patients in health research, but it can be challenging for researchers to find patient partners. More than taking part in research as participants, patient partners help design, carry out and manage research projects. The goal of this study was to describe ways that patient partners have been recruited by researchers and patient engagement leads (individuals within organizations responsible for promoting and supporting patients as research partners). We talked with researchers and patient engagement leads in Canada and the United Kingdom, as well as a patient representative. We found three ways that could help researchers and patients find each other. One way is a case-by-case basis, where patients are often sought with experience of a health condition that is the focus of the research. The other ways involved directories where projects were posted and could be found by patients and researchers, or a third party matched patients with research projects. We found four recruitment strategies:Social marketingCommunity outreachHealth systemPartnering with other organizations (e.g., advocacy groups) There are many influences on finding, selecting and retaining patient partners: patient characteristics, the local setting, the opportunity, work climate, education and support. We hope study results will provide a useful starting point for research teams in recruiting their patient partners.

ABSTRACT

Patient engagement in clinical trials and other health research continues to gain momentum. While the benefits of patient engagement in research are emerging, relatively little is known about recruiting patients as research partners. The purpose of this study was to describe recruitment strategies and models of recruiting patients as partners in health research. Qualitative descriptive study. Thirteen patient engagement leads and health researchers from Canada and the United Kingdom, as well as one patient representative from a national patient organization (7 female) completed semi-structured interviews. Recruitment infrastructures available to respondents varied, but could be categorized into three models including the traditional, third-party and directory models. Four categories of recruitment strategies were identified, representing multiple ways of recruiting patient partners: social marketing recruitment, community outreach recruitment, health system recruitment, and partnering recruitment. Multiple recruitment strategies were identified for engaging patient partners in research, and some common factors influenced recruitment. Study findings contribute to the evidence base in patient engagement and provide guidance for research teams to help identify potential recruitment methods for their patient partners.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b97/5611573/b1336ff47269/40900_2017_67_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b97/5611573/b1336ff47269/40900_2017_67_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b97/5611573/b1336ff47269/40900_2017_67_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

通俗易懂的总结

越来越多的资助者和研究人员希望在健康研究中与患者合作,但研究人员找到患者合作伙伴可能具有挑战性。患者合作伙伴不仅仅是作为参与者参与研究,还会帮助设计、开展和管理研究项目。本研究的目的是描述研究人员以及患者参与负责人(组织内负责促进和支持患者成为研究合作伙伴的人员)招募患者合作伙伴的方式。我们与加拿大和英国的研究人员、患者参与负责人以及一位患者代表进行了交谈。我们发现了三种可以帮助研究人员和患者相互找到对方的方法。一种方法是逐案处理,通常会寻找患有研究重点关注的健康状况的患者。其他方法包括发布项目的目录,患者和研究人员可以在其中找到项目,或者第三方将患者与研究项目进行匹配。我们发现了四种招募策略:社会营销、社区外展、卫生系统、与其他组织(如倡导团体)合作。在寻找、选择和留住患者合作伙伴方面存在许多影响因素:患者特征、当地环境、机会、工作氛围、教育和支持。我们希望研究结果将为研究团队招募患者合作伙伴提供一个有用的起点。

摘要

患者参与临床试验和其他健康研究的势头持续增强。虽然患者参与研究的益处正在显现,但对于招募患者作为研究合作伙伴的了解相对较少。本研究的目的是描述招募患者作为健康研究合作伙伴的策略和模式。定性描述性研究。来自加拿大和英国的13名患者参与负责人、健康研究人员以及一名来自全国患者组织的患者代表(7名女性)完成了半结构化访谈。受访者可用的招募基础设施各不相同,但可分为三种模式,包括传统模式、第三方模式和目录模式。确定了四类招募策略,代表了招募患者合作伙伴的多种方式:社会营销招募、社区外展招募、卫生系统招募和合作招募。确定了多种招募患者合作伙伴参与研究的策略,并且一些共同因素影响了招募。研究结果有助于丰富患者参与方面的证据基础,并为研究团队提供指导,以帮助他们确定潜在的患者合作伙伴招募方法。

相似文献

1
Recruiting patients as partners in health research: a qualitative descriptive study.招募患者作为健康研究的合作伙伴:一项定性描述性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 21;3:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0067-x. eCollection 2017.
2
Exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of the patient partner role: a qualitative study.探索患者及护理者对患者伴侣角色意义的认知:一项定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 28;9(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00511-9.
3
Using qualitative Health Research methods to improve patient and public involvement and engagement in research.运用定性健康研究方法,改善患者及公众对研究的参与度。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 13;4:49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0129-8. eCollection 2018.
4
Working together in health research: a mixed-methods patient engagement evaluation.健康研究中的合作:一项混合方法的患者参与度评估
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 1;9(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00475-w.
5
Patient engagement in a national research network: barriers, facilitators, and impacts.患者参与国家研究网络:障碍、促进因素及影响
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 8;9(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00418-5.
6
Recognizing patient partner contributions to health research: a mixed methods research protocol.认识患者合作伙伴对健康研究的贡献:一项混合方法研究方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 6;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00354-w.
7
Valuing All Voices: refining a trauma-informed, intersectional and critical reflexive framework for patient engagement in health research using a qualitative descriptive approach.重视所有声音:运用定性描述方法完善一个用于患者参与健康研究的创伤知情、交叉性和批判性反思框架。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jul 19;6:42. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00217-2. eCollection 2020.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
Stakeholder engagement in eight comparative effectiveness trials in African Americans and Latinos with asthma.利益相关者参与针对非裔美国人和拉丁裔哮喘患者的八项比较疗效试验。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 24;8(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00399-x.
10
Protocol for co-producing a framework and integrated resource platform for engaging patients in laboratory-based research.共同制定让患者参与实验室研究的框架和综合资源平台的方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 12;10(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00545-7.

引用本文的文献

1
How to become partners. Ways to enhance the quality of patient and public involvement in healthcare research.如何成为合作伙伴。提高患者和公众参与医疗保健研究质量的方法。
Qual Res Med Healthc. 2025 Jun 25;9(2):100016. doi: 10.1016/j.qrmh.2025.100016. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
A multi-method evaluation of how equity deserving communities were engaged in research.对公平应得社区如何参与研究的多方法评估。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 30;25(1):2001. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23149-6.
3
From Doubt to Diagnosis: Canadian Patient Perspectives on a Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Diagnosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' motivations and interest in research: characteristics of volunteers for patient-led projects on PatientsLikeMe.患者参与研究的动机和兴趣:PatientsLikeMe上患者主导项目的志愿者特征。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Dec 9;2:33. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0047-6. eCollection 2016.
2
Engaging patients as partners in research: Factors associated with awareness, interest, and engagement as research partners.让患者成为研究伙伴:与作为研究伙伴的认知、兴趣和参与相关的因素。
SAGE Open Med. 2017 Jan 4;5:2050312116686709. doi: 10.1177/2050312116686709. eCollection 2017.
3
The power of symbolic capital in patient and public involvement in health research.
从怀疑到诊断:加拿大患者对肢带型肌营养不良症诊断的看法
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70271. doi: 10.1111/hex.70271.
4
The People's Review protocol: planning an innovative study powered by the public.《人民评议》方案:规划一项由公众推动的创新性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 25;11(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00682-7.
5
Co-creating a person-centered creative engagement intervention for Parkinson's care.共同创建以患者为中心的帕金森病护理创意参与干预措施。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 15;15:1469120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1469120. eCollection 2024.
6
Conducting Patient-Oriented Research in Pediatric Populations: A Narrative Review.在儿科人群中开展以患者为导向的研究:一项叙述性综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;11(10):1266. doi: 10.3390/children11101266.
7
A protocol for stakeholder engagement in head and neck cancer pragmatic trials.头颈部癌症实用临床试验中利益相关者参与的方案。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):1109. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12733-5.
8
Studying How Patient Engagement Influences Research: A Mixed Methods Study.研究患者参与如何影响研究:一项混合方法研究。
Patient. 2024 Jul;17(4):379-395. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00685-8. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
9
Involving parents of children treated for cancer in Sweden as public contributors to inform the design and conduct of an evaluation of internet-administered self-help for parents of children treated for cancer: a protocol.让瑞典接受癌症治疗儿童的父母作为公众参与者,为一项针对接受癌症治疗儿童的父母的互联网自助评估的设计和实施提供信息:一项方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 2;10(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00532-4.
10
Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey.妇科癌症国际协作组中患者参与研究的情况:呼吁采取系统方法:一项调查结果
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e1735. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1735. eCollection 2023 Dec.
象征资本在健康研究中患者和公众参与的力量。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):836-844. doi: 10.1111/hex.12519. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
4
Patient engagement: What partnering with patient in research is all about.患者参与:与患者合作开展研究的全部内容。
Thromb Res. 2017 Feb;150:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.10.029. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
5
Expanding patient engagement in quality improvement and health system redesign: Three Canadian case studies.扩大患者在质量改进和卫生系统重新设计中的参与度:三个加拿大案例研究。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2016 Sep;29(5):176-82. doi: 10.1177/0840470416645601.
6
Partnering With Patients in the Development and Lifecycle of Medicines: A Call for Action.在药物研发及生命周期中与患者合作:行动呼吁
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Nov;49(6):929-939. doi: 10.1177/2168479015580384.
7
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.患者及利益相关者参与患者为中心的结果研究所试点项目:描述与经验教训
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
8
The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research.患者为中心的结果研究的PCORI视角。
JAMA. 2014 Oct 15;312(15):1513-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.11100.
9
A systematic review of approaches for engaging patients for research on rare diseases.关于让患者参与罕见病研究的方法的系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug;29 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S788-800. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2895-9.
10
A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research.利益相关者参与比较效果研究和以患者为中心的结局研究的系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1692-701. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2878-x. Epub 2014 Jun 4.