• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艾滋病毒临床研究项目中患者参与面临的挑战:对利益相关者叙述的定性分析

Challenges of Patient Engagement in an HIV Clinical Research Program: A Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Accounts.

作者信息

Lessard David, Engler Kim, Vicente Serge, Bilodeau Martin, Lebouché Bertrand

机构信息

Chronic and Viral Illness Service (CVIS), McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Canada.

Centre for Health Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (RI-MUHC), Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):925-930. doi: 10.1177/2374373520975728. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1177/2374373520975728
PMID:33457522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786743/
Abstract

Patient engagement (PE) promotes collaboration between stakeholders (researchers, patients, clinicians, etc). It often faces challenges due to tensions between its ethical/political and scientific underpinnings. This article explores how stakeholders applied the guiding principles of a PE project ("co-build," "support and mutual respect," and "inclusiveness") for an HIV clinical research program initiated in January 2016. Three researchers/clinicians, a PE agent, and 2 patients held 3 meetings (June-October 2018) to discuss challenges faced and how these impacted their approach to PE. Regular stakeholder discussions about PE in clinical research could be documented and help guide PE to better meet stakeholder needs.

摘要

患者参与(PE)促进了利益相关者(研究人员、患者、临床医生等)之间的合作。由于其伦理/政治基础与科学基础之间的矛盾,它常常面临挑战。本文探讨了利益相关者如何将一个患者参与项目的指导原则(“共同构建”、“支持与相互尊重”以及“包容性”)应用于2016年1月启动的一项艾滋病毒临床研究项目。三名研究人员/临床医生、一名患者参与代理人以及两名患者举行了三次会议(2018年6月至10月),以讨论所面临的挑战以及这些挑战如何影响他们对患者参与的处理方式。关于临床研究中患者参与的定期利益相关者讨论可以记录下来,并有助于指导患者参与更好地满足利益相关者的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b558/7786743/89365383448d/10.1177_2374373520975728-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b558/7786743/89365383448d/10.1177_2374373520975728-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b558/7786743/89365383448d/10.1177_2374373520975728-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Challenges of Patient Engagement in an HIV Clinical Research Program: A Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Accounts.艾滋病毒临床研究项目中患者参与面临的挑战:对利益相关者叙述的定性分析
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):925-930. doi: 10.1177/2374373520975728. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
2
What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: Are these expectations being met?利益相关者对患者参与有哪些期望:这些期望得到满足了吗?
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1035-1045. doi: 10.1111/hex.12797. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
3
Learning to work together - lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement.学会协同合作——一项关于公众参与的研究项目反思性分析的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 9;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0051-x. eCollection 2017.
4
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.患者及利益相关者参与患者为中心的结果研究所试点项目:描述与经验教训
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
5
Stakeholder Engagement in Planning the Design of a National Needs Assessment for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Management in Nepal.利益相关者参与规划尼泊尔心血管疾病预防和管理国家需求评估的设计。
Glob Heart. 2019 Jun;14(2):181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2019.05.002.
6
7
The Role of Patient Advisory Councils in Health Research: Lessons From Two Provincial Councils in Canada.患者咨询委员会在健康研究中的作用:来自加拿大两个省级委员会的经验教训。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):898-905. doi: 10.1177/2374373520909598. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
8
360-degree Delphi: addressing sociotechnical challenges of healthcare IT.360 度德尔菲法:应对医疗信息技术的社会技术挑战。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1071-x.
9
Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts.让利益相关者参与康复研究:对伙伴关系中使用的策略及影响评估的范围综述
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(15):1390-400. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.963705. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
10
Stakeholder engagement in the study and management of invasive alien species.利益相关者参与入侵外来物种的研究和管理。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Jan 1;229:88-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.044. Epub 2018 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and public involvement in HIV research: a mapping review and development of an online evidence map.患者和公众参与 HIV 研究:一项制图综述及在线证据图谱的开发。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2024 Nov;27(11):e26385. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26385.
2
Identifying research priorities and essential elements of palliative care services for people facing malignant brain tumors: A participatory co-design approach.确定恶性脑肿瘤患者姑息治疗服务的研究重点和基本要素:一种参与式协同设计方法。
Neurooncol Pract. 2024 Jun 19;11(5):556-565. doi: 10.1093/nop/npae052. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Impact of dedicated women's outreach workers (WOWs) on recruitment of women in ACTG clinical studies.

本文引用的文献

1
What lessons it might teach us? Community engagement in HIV research.它可能会给我们带来哪些启示?社区参与艾滋病研究。
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2020 Mar;15(2):142-149. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000605.
2
Assessing the Content Validity of a New Patient-Reported Measure of Barriers to Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence for Electronic Administration in Routine HIV Care: Proposal for a Web-Based Delphi Study.评估一种新的患者报告的抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性障碍测量方法在常规HIV护理中电子管理的内容效度:基于网络的德尔菲研究提案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Aug 2;8(8):e12836. doi: 10.2196/12836.
3
From Craft to Reflective Art and Science Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review".
专门的女性外展工作人员(WOWs)对 ACTG 临床研究中招募女性的影响。
HIV Res Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;22(2):37-45. doi: 10.1080/25787489.2021.1938825. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
从手工艺到反思艺术和科学——评“医疗组织和系统层面决策中患者参与的度量和评估工具:系统评价”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Feb 1;8(2):124-127. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.108.
4
Evaluation of a project to engage patients in the development of a patient-reported measure for HIV care (the I-Score Study).评估一个项目,让患者参与到 HIV 护理的患者报告衡量指标的制定中(I-Score 研究)。
Health Expect. 2019 Apr;22(2):209-225. doi: 10.1111/hex.12845. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
5
Patient-Engaged Research: Choosing the "Right" Patients to Avoid Pitfalls.患者参与式研究:选择“合适”的患者以避免陷阱。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Sep;48(5):26-34. doi: 10.1002/hast.898.
6
'Is it worth doing?' Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research.“这值得做吗?”衡量患者及公众参与研究的影响。
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Jul 31;1:6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0008-5. eCollection 2015.
7
What is "the patient perspective" in patient engagement programs? Implicit logics and parallels to feminist theories.患者参与项目中的“患者视角”是什么?隐含逻辑及与女性主义理论的相似之处。
Health (London). 2017 Jan;21(1):76-92. doi: 10.1177/1363459316644494. Epub 2016 Jul 24.
8
Evaluation of public involvement in research: time for a major re-think?评估公众参与研究:是时候进行重大反思了?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016 Jul;21(3):209-11. doi: 10.1177/1355819615612510. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
9
Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research.定性研究中的效度和信度问题。
Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Apr;18(2):34-5. doi: 10.1136/eb-2015-102054. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
10
Disengagement and Engagement Coping with HIV/AIDS Stigma and Psychological Well-Being of People with HIV/AIDS.应对艾滋病毒/艾滋病污名与艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者心理健康的脱离与参与应对方式
J Soc Clin Psychol. 2012 Feb 1;31(2):123-150. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2012.31.2.123.