评估公众参与研究：是时候进行重大反思了？
Evaluation of public involvement in research: time for a major re-think?
作者信息
Edelman Natalie, Barron Duncan
机构信息
Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Health Research, University of Brighton, UK
Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Health Research, University of Brighton, UK.
出版信息
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016 Jul;21(3):209-11. doi: 10.1177/1355819615612510. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
Abstract
The way that public involvement in research has been evaluated as a complex intervention has derailed the development of an evidence base. Two alternative approaches are available for constructing and evaluating patient involvement, each of which requires us to revisit the purposes and values that underpin it in each stage of the research process.
摘要
将公众参与研究作为一种复杂干预措施进行评估的方式，已经偏离了证据基础的发展轨道。构建和评估患者参与有两种可供选择的方法，每种方法都要求我们重新审视在研究过程的每个阶段作为其基础的目的和价值观。
相似文献
1
Evaluation of public involvement in research: time for a major re-think?评估公众参与研究：是时候进行重大反思了？
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016 Jul;21(3):209-11. doi: 10.1177/1355819615612510. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
2
A research note on the benefit of patient and public involvement in research: The experience of prostate cancer patients regarding information in radiotherapy.关于患者及公众参与研究的益处的研究笔记：前列腺癌患者在放疗信息方面的经历
Radiography (Lond). 2017 May;23(2):167-170. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research.GRIPP 清单：提高患者和公众参与研究报告的质量。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Oct;27(4):391-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000481.
4
Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives.患者及公众参与临床指南：国际经验与未来展望。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):e22. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.034835. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
5
Patient and public involvement in emergency care research.患者及公众参与急诊护理研究。
Emerg Med J. 2016 Sep;33(9):665-70. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205700. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
6
Exploring patient and public involvement in stroke research: a qualitative study.探索患者及公众参与中风研究：一项定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(23):2174-83. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.1001525. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
7
Evaluating patient and public involvement in research.评估患者及公众参与研究的情况。
BMJ. 2018 Dec 6;363:k5147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5147.
8
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
9
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
10
PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION.公众和患者参与卫生技术评估：行动框架
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(4):256-264. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000362. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
引用本文的文献
1
Patient and public involvement in research published in the 2015-2021: A scoping review.2015 - 2021年发表的研究中患者及公众的参与：一项范围综述。
Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Jun;86(6):400-412. doi: 10.1177/03080226231165374. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
2
How to Survive and Succeed in the Design and Execution of a Collaborative Randomized Controlled Trial.如何在协作性随机对照试验的设计与实施中生存并取得成功。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2025 Jul;13(6):911-916. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12726. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
3
Co-creating tools for embedding meaningful patient and public involvement and engagement in real-world data and evidence research in the pharmaceutical industry setting: a multistakeholder participatory co-design study.共同创建工具，以在制药行业环境中切实将患者和公众参与及融入真实世界数据与证据研究：一项多利益相关方参与式协同设计研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 17;15(2):e088914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088914.
4
Public Involvement to Enhance Care Home Research; Collaboration on a Minimum Data Set for Care Homes.公众参与以加强养老院研究；关于养老院最小数据集的合作。
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70140. doi: 10.1111/hex.70140.
5
MuSic Moves-co-creating a music-supported exercise programme with and for people with multiple sclerosis: a bicentre participatory mixed methods study.音乐运动——与多发性硬化症患者共同创建音乐支持的锻炼计划：一项双中心参与式混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 24;14(11):e091168. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091168.
6
"There's no us vs. them, it's just us": a creative approach to centring lived experience within the AVATAR2 trial.“没有我们与他们的对立，只有我们”：在 AVATAR2 试验中以创造性的方法将生活体验置于中心。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):807. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06268-z.
7
Implementation of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) for the therapies for long COVID in non-hospitalised individuals (TLC) project.针对非住院个体长期新冠病毒感染治疗（TLC）项目实施患者及公众参与和介入（PPIE）。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Nov 9;10(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00654-3.
8
Evaluating parent and public involvement activities within a paediatric palliative care research centre: Route map to impactful and meaningful engagement.评估儿科姑息治疗研究中心中的家长和公众参与活动：实现有影响力和有意义的参与的路线图。
Palliat Med. 2024 Oct;38(9):1010-1020. doi: 10.1177/02692163241266374. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
9
Ready, set, co(produce): a co-operative inquiry into co-producing research to explore adolescent health and wellbeing in the Born in Bradford Age of Wonder project.准备，开始，共同（产出）：在布拉德福德奇迹时代项目中，对共同开展研究以探索青少年健康与幸福进行的合作性探究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Apr 30;10(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00578-y.
10
Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment.描述制药行业研究背景下有意义的患者和公众参与：回顾性质量评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 23;13(8):e071339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071339.
本文引用的文献
1
Patient and public involvement in the early stages of clinical trial development: a systematic cohort investigation.患者及公众参与临床试验早期阶段：一项系统性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 23;4(7):e005234. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005234.
2
Exploring perceived barriers, drivers, impacts and the need for evaluation of public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study.探索公众参与健康和社会护理研究中所感知到的障碍、驱动因素、影响及评估需求：一项改良德尔菲研究
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 17;4(6):e004943. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004943.
3
Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study.探索公众参与健康和社会护理研究背后价值观的共识与冲突领域：一项改良德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 10;4(1):e004217. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004217.
4
Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review.公众参与健康和社会护理研究的相关价值：一项叙述性综述。
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):661-75. doi: 10.1111/hex.12158. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
5
Health care: Bring on the evidence.医疗保健：拿出证据来。
Nature. 2013 Sep 12;501(7466):160-1. doi: 10.1038/501160a.
6
'The missing links': understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research.缺失的环节：理解背景和机制如何影响公众参与研究的效果
Health Expect. 2014 Dec;17(6):755-64. doi: 10.1111/hex.12017. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
7
PPI, paradoxes and Plato: who's sailing the ship?质子泵抑制剂、悖论和柏拉图：谁在掌舵？
J Med Ethics. 2013 Mar;39(3):181-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100150. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
8
The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research.GRIPP 清单：提高患者和公众参与研究报告的质量。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Oct;27(4):391-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000481.
9
Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: a narrative review of case examples.公众参与健康和社会保健系统评价过程：案例分析叙述性综述。
Health Policy. 2011 Oct;102(2-3):105-16. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.05.002.
10
Professionals and the public: power or partnership in health research?专业人员和公众：健康研究中的权力还是伙伴关系？
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):276-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01572.x. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
Zotero 插件