• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与军事治疗机构内的个体产前护理相比,完成团体产前护理(集中孕期护理)的女性的医疗保健经历。

Health Care Experience Among Women Who Completed Group Prenatal Care (CenteringPregnancy) Compared to Individual Prenatal Care Within Military Treatment Facilities.

作者信息

Fowler Tara Trudnak, Aiyelawo Kimberley Marshall, Frazier Chantell, Holden Craig, Dorris Joseph

机构信息

Altarum Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, VA, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1234-1240. doi: 10.1177/2374373520925275. Epub 2020 May 19.

DOI:10.1177/2374373520925275
PMID:33457570
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786673/
Abstract

This study compared TRICARE, the health care program of the United States Department of Defense Military Health System, beneficiaries in CenteringPregnancy, an enhanced prenatal care model, to women in individual prenatal care within the same military treatment facility. Maternity patient experience ratings from May 2014 to February 2016 were compiled from the TRICARE Outpatient Satisfaction Survey. Centering patients had 1.91 higher odds of being satisfied with ( < .01, 95% CI = 1.2-3.1) than women in individual care. Specifically, the measure found Centering patients to have 2.00 higher odds of being satisfied than women in individual care ( < .01, 95% CI = 1.2-3.3). There were no other statistically significant differences between cohorts. Qualitative responses indicate most Centering patients surveyed had good experiences, appreciated the structure and communication with others, and would recommend the program. Providers identified command/leadership support, dedicated space, and buy-in from all staff as important factors for successful implementation. Enhanced prenatal care models may improve access to and experiences with care. Program evaluation will be important as the military health system continues to implement such programs.

摘要

本研究将美国国防部军事卫生系统的医疗保健项目TRICARE的受益人、采用强化产前护理模式的“孕期集中护理”项目中的女性,与同一军事治疗机构中接受个体产前护理的女性进行了比较。2014年5月至2016年2月的产妇患者体验评分来自TRICARE门诊满意度调查。与接受个体护理的女性相比,参加“孕期集中护理”项目的患者满意度更高的几率高出1.91倍(P<0.01,95%置信区间=1.2-3.1)。具体而言,该测量发现参加“孕期集中护理”项目的患者满意度更高的几率比接受个体护理的女性高出2.00倍(P<0.01,95%置信区间=1.2-3.3)。各队列之间没有其他统计学上的显著差异。定性回答表明,大多数接受调查的“孕期集中护理”项目患者都有良好的体验,赞赏其结构以及与他人的沟通,并会推荐该项目。提供者认为,指挥部/领导层的支持、专用空间以及所有工作人员的认同是成功实施该项目的重要因素。强化产前护理模式可能会改善医疗服务的可及性和体验。随着军事卫生系统继续实施此类项目,项目评估将很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136a/7786673/f30bae455057/10.1177_2374373520925275-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136a/7786673/67dfb7d81d55/10.1177_2374373520925275-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136a/7786673/f30bae455057/10.1177_2374373520925275-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136a/7786673/67dfb7d81d55/10.1177_2374373520925275-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136a/7786673/f30bae455057/10.1177_2374373520925275-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Health Care Experience Among Women Who Completed Group Prenatal Care (CenteringPregnancy) Compared to Individual Prenatal Care Within Military Treatment Facilities.与军事治疗机构内的个体产前护理相比,完成团体产前护理(集中孕期护理)的女性的医疗保健经历。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1234-1240. doi: 10.1177/2374373520925275. Epub 2020 May 19.
2
Outcomes of Latina women in CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care compared with individual prenatal care.拉美裔女性在集中妊娠组产前护理中的结局与个体产前护理的比较。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;58(4):396-403. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12000. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
3
Study protocol for the implementation of Centering Patients with Fibroids, a novel group education and empowerment program for patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids.《以患者为中心的子宫肌瘤管理方案》实施研究方案:一项针对有症状子宫肌瘤患者的新型团体教育和赋权项目
Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 1;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01777-2.
4
5
TRICARE senior demonstration of military managed care--DOD. Notice of demonstration project.军事医疗保健的TRICARE老年人示范项目——国防部。示范项目通知。
Fed Regist. 1998 Jul 17;63(137):38558-9.
6
Childbearing in U.S. military hospitals: dimensions of care affecting women's perceptions of quality and satisfaction.美国军事医院中的生育:影响女性对质量和满意度认知的护理维度。
Birth. 2005 Mar;32(1):4-10. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00342.x.
7
The Effects of Group Prenatal Care on Infant Birthweight and Maternal Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial.小组产前护理对婴儿出生体重和产妇幸福感的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Mil Med. 2019 May 1;184(5-6):e440-e446. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy361.
8
Key Considerations for Implementing Group Prenatal Care: Lessons from 60 Practices.实施群体产前保健需考虑的要点:60 个实践案例的经验教训。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Mar;65(2):208-215. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13047. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
9
Virtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average-risk patients: a prospective cohort study.虚拟产前访视在一般风险孕妇中与较高的患者体验和满意度相关:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 6;23(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05421-y.
10
"I wasn't alone"--a study of group prenatal care in the military.“我并不孤单”——一项关于军队中集体产前护理的研究。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009 May-Jun;54(3):176-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.11.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived satisfaction of prenatal care among women without social security: comparative qualitative analysis between individual and group care models in Mexico.无社会保障女性对产前护理的感知满意度:墨西哥个体护理模式与团体护理模式的比较质性分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 13;15(8):e094797. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094797.
2
Maternal satisfaction with group care: a systematic review.产妇对集体护理的满意度:一项系统综述。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Dec 24;4(1):100301. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100301. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
The Influence of Four Constructs of Social Support on Pregnancy Experiences in Group Prenatal Care.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of CenteringPregnancy Group Prenatal Care on Birth Outcomes in Medicaid Eligible Women.《中心孕期护理小组对符合医疗补助资格的女性分娩结局的影响》。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jul;28(7):919-928. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7469. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
2
Effects of a Multi-site Expansion of Group Prenatal Care on Birth Outcomes.多地点扩展小组产前护理对分娩结果的影响。
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Oct;23(10):1424-1433. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02795-4.
3
The Effects of Group Prenatal Care on Infant Birthweight and Maternal Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
社会支持的四个构成要素对团体产前护理中妊娠体验的影响
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2021 Jun 2;2(1):154-162. doi: 10.1089/whr.2020.0113. eCollection 2021.
小组产前护理对婴儿出生体重和产妇幸福感的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Mil Med. 2019 May 1;184(5-6):e440-e446. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy361.
4
Deployment and Preterm Birth Among US Army Soldiers.美国陆军士兵的部署与早产。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 1;187(4):687-695. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy003.
5
Promoting improved social support and quality of life with the CenteringPregnancy group model of prenatal care.通过围产期护理的集中怀孕小组模式促进社会支持和生活质量的改善。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017 Feb;20(1):209-220. doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0698-1. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
6
Comparative study analysing women's childbirth satisfaction and obstetric outcomes across two different models of maternity care.一项比较研究,分析两种不同产科护理模式下女性的分娩满意度和产科结局。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 26;6(8):e011362. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011362.
7
Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.群组产前护理与传统产前护理的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):551-61. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001560.
8
Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality.审视患者体验调查在衡量医疗质量方面的作用。
Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Oct;71(5):522-54. doi: 10.1177/1077558714541480. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
9
Patient satisfaction survey as a tool towards quality improvement.患者满意度调查作为提高质量的一种工具。
Oman Med J. 2014 Jan;29(1):3-7. doi: 10.5001/omj.2014.02.
10
Spouse Psychological Well-Being: A Keystone to Military Family Health.配偶的心理健康:军事家庭健康的关键要素。
J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2013 Jan 1;23(6). doi: 10.1080/10911359.2013.795068.