Tubay Amy Tanner, Mansalis Kate A, Simpson Matthew J, Armitage Nicole H, Briscoe Gabriel, Potts Vicki
48th Medical Group, Building 932, RAF Lakenheath, Brandon, Suffolk, UK.
David Grant USAF Medical Center, 101 Bodin Circle, Travis AFB, CA.
Mil Med. 2019 May 1;184(5-6):e440-e446. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy361.
Group prenatal care models have been in use in the USA for over 20 years and have shown benefits in reducing rates of preterm birth and low birth weight infants in high-risk civilian populations. Group prenatal care has been widely implemented at military treatment facilities, despite a lack of high-quality evidence for improved perinatal outcomes in this population.
In this randomized, controlled trial, 129 patients at a military treatment facility received either traditional one-on-one prenatal care or group prenatal care using the CenteringPregnancy model. CenteringPregnancy care was administered by certified nurse midwives and family medicine residents and faculty. The primary outcomes were infant birthweight appropriateness for gestational age, maternal anxiety (as measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) and depression (as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale), and patient satisfaction (as measured by the Short-Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire). Infant birthweights were compared using Chi-square tests for the categorical variables of small for gestational age (SGA), appropriate for gestational age (AGA), or large for gestational age. Maternal mood and satisfaction scores were evaluated before, during, and after the intervention and analyzed using rank sum tests. Additional demographic and outcome data were collected directly from participants and extracted from patient records.
Patients receiving group care were more likely to deliver an infant that was appropriate for gestational age, with an incidence ratio of 1.12 [CI = 1.01-1.25, p = 0.04]. Depression and anxiety levels remained similar between groups throughout the study. Satisfaction was similar between groups, though patients receiving group care reported higher satisfaction with the accessibility and convenience of their care at the study's end [p = 0.048]. There were no differences between groups in preterm births, maternal or neonatal morbidity, mode of delivery, maternal weight gain, or breastfeeding rates.
Military parturients receiving group prenatal care in the CenteringPregnancy model were less likely to deliver an small for gestational age or large for gestational age newborn and were more likely to be satisfied with their access to care. Group prenatal care is well received by patients and may positively influence neonatal metabolic status.
群体产前护理模式在美国已使用超过20年,且已证明在降低高危平民群体的早产率和低出生体重儿发生率方面具有益处。尽管缺乏关于该群体围产期结局改善的高质量证据,但群体产前护理已在军事治疗机构广泛实施。
在这项随机对照试验中,一家军事治疗机构的129名患者接受了传统一对一产前护理或采用“以孕妇为中心”模式的群体产前护理。“以孕妇为中心”护理由认证护士助产士以及家庭医学住院医师和教员实施。主要结局包括婴儿出生体重与孕周的适配性、产妇焦虑(通过状态-特质焦虑量表测量)和抑郁(通过流行病学研究中心抑郁量表测量)以及患者满意度(通过简短患者满意度问卷测量)。使用卡方检验对孕周小(SGA)、孕周适宜(AGA)或孕周大的分类变量比较婴儿出生体重。在干预前、干预期间和干预后评估产妇情绪和满意度得分,并使用秩和检验进行分析。从参与者直接收集其他人口统计学和结局数据,并从患者记录中提取。
接受群体护理的患者更有可能分娩出孕周适宜的婴儿,发病率比为1.12[CI = 1.01 - 1.25,p = 0.04]。在整个研究过程中,两组之间的抑郁和焦虑水平保持相似。两组之间的满意度相似,不过接受群体护理的患者在研究结束时对护理的可及性和便利性报告了更高的满意度[p = 0.