• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过教授共情触摸和眼神交流改善患者体验:医学生的一项随机对照试验

Improving Patient Experience by Teaching Empathic Touch and Eye Gaze: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Medical Students.

作者信息

Lecat Paul, Dhawan Naveen, Hartung Paul J, Gerzina Holly, Larson Robert, Konen-Butler Cassandra

机构信息

Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED), College of Medicine, Rootstown, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1260-1270. doi: 10.1177/2374373520916323. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1177/2374373520916323
PMID:33457574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786748/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Empathy is critical for optimal patient experience with health-care providers. Verbal empathy is routinely taught to medical students, but nonverbal empathy, including touch, less so. Our objective was to determine whether instruction encouraging empathic touch and eye gaze at exit can impact behaviors and change patient-perceived empathy.

MATERIALS

A randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial of 34 first-year medical students was conducted during standardized patient (SP) interviews. A video either encouraging empathic touch and eye gaze at exit or demonstrating proper hand hygiene (control) was shown. Encounter videos were analyzed for touch and eye gaze at exit. The Jefferson Scale of Patient Perceptions of Physician Empathy was used to measure correlations. Intervention students were surveyed regarding patient touch.

RESULTS

Of this, 23.5% of intervention students touched the SP versus zero controls; 88.2% of intervention students demonstrated eye gaze at exit. Eye gaze at exit positively impacted patient-perceived empathy (correlation = 0.48, > .001). Survey responses revealed specific barriers to touch.

CONCLUSION

Medical students may increase perceived empathy using eye gaze at exit. Instruction on empathic touch and sustained eye gaze at exit at the medical school level may be useful in promoting empathic nonverbal communication. Medical educators should consider providing specific instructions on how to appropriately touch patients during history-taking. This is one of the few studies to explore touch with patients and the first ever to report the positive correlation of a health provider's sustained eye gaze at exit with the patient's perceived empathy. Further studies are needed to explore barriers to empathic touch.

摘要

背景

同理心对于患者获得与医护人员相处的最佳体验至关重要。言语同理心是医学生常规学习的内容,但非言语同理心,包括触摸,受到的关注较少。我们的目标是确定在问诊结束时鼓励共情触摸和目光接触的指导是否会影响行为并改变患者所感受到的同理心。

材料

在标准化患者(SP)访谈期间,对34名一年级医学生进行了一项随机、对照、双盲试验。播放了一段视频,视频内容要么是鼓励在问诊结束时进行共情触摸和目光接触,要么是演示正确的手部卫生(对照组)。对问诊视频进行分析,以观察问诊结束时的触摸和目光接触情况。使用杰斐逊医生同理心患者感知量表来测量相关性。对接受干预的学生进行了关于患者触摸情况的调查。

结果

其中,23.5%的接受干预的学生触摸了标准化患者,而对照组为零;88.2%的接受干预的学生在问诊结束时表现出目光接触。问诊结束时的目光接触对患者所感受到的同理心有积极影响(相关性 = 0.48,P <.001)。调查回复揭示了触摸方面的具体障碍。

结论

医学生可以通过在问诊结束时进行目光接触来提高患者所感受到的同理心。在医学院层面开展关于共情触摸和问诊结束时持续目光接触的指导,可能有助于促进共情的非言语交流。医学教育工作者应考虑提供关于在病史采集过程中如何适当触摸患者的具体指导。这是为数不多的探索与患者触摸的研究之一,也是有史以来第一项报告医护人员问诊结束时持续目光接触与患者所感受到的同理心呈正相关的研究。需要进一步研究来探索共情触摸的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0773/7786748/16a83f026bd2/10.1177_2374373520916323-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0773/7786748/b5cb32101567/10.1177_2374373520916323-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0773/7786748/79f2e0de513e/10.1177_2374373520916323-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0773/7786748/16a83f026bd2/10.1177_2374373520916323-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0773/7786748/b5cb32101567/10.1177_2374373520916323-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0773/7786748/79f2e0de513e/10.1177_2374373520916323-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0773/7786748/16a83f026bd2/10.1177_2374373520916323-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving Patient Experience by Teaching Empathic Touch and Eye Gaze: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Medical Students.通过教授共情触摸和眼神交流改善患者体验:医学生的一项随机对照试验
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1260-1270. doi: 10.1177/2374373520916323. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
2
Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient?医学生对虚拟病人会做出共情反应吗?
Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):756-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.021.
3
Using Virtual Patients to Teach Empathy: A Randomized Controlled Study to Enhance Medical Students' Empathic Communication.使用虚拟患者来培养同理心:一项增强医学生同理心沟通能力的随机对照研究。
Simul Healthc. 2016 Jun;11(3):181-9. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000142.
4
How medical school alters empathy: Student love and break up letters to empathy for patients.医学院如何改变同理心:学生写给对病人的同理心的情书和分手信。
Med Educ. 2021 Mar;55(3):394-403. doi: 10.1111/medu.14403. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
5
Enhancing Student Empathetic Engagement, History-Taking, and Communication Skills During Electronic Medical Record Use in Patient Care.在患者护理中使用电子病历期间提高学生的共情参与度、病史采集能力和沟通技巧。
Acad Med. 2017 Jul;92(7):1022-1027. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001476.
6
Corrigendum to Improving Patient Experience by Teaching Empathic Touch and Eye Gaze: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Medical Students.《通过教授共情触摸和眼神交流改善患者体验:医学生的一项随机对照试验》勘误
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1797. doi: 10.1177/2374373520927103. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
7
Empathy Between Physician Assistant Students and Standardized Patients: Evidence of an Inflation Bias.医师助理专业学生与标准化病人之间的同理心:存在夸大偏差的证据。
J Physician Assist Educ. 2015 Jun;26(2):93-8.
8
Verbal and non-verbal communication skills including empathy during history taking of undergraduate medical students.医学生问诊时的口头和非口头沟通技巧,包括同理心。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1260-9.
9
[Teaching empathy in medical education].[医学教育中的同理心教学]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2005 Summer;16(2):83-9.
10
Beyond words: What can help first year medical students practice effective empathic communication?言外之意:有什么可以帮助医学生练习有效的共情沟通?
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Nov;101(11):2005-2010. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Blurring the Line Between Standardized and Real Patients: Twelve Tips for Improving the Authenticity of Standardized Patient Encounters.模糊标准化患者与真实患者之间的界限:提高标准化患者问诊真实性的十二条建议。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Nov 12;35(2):1017-1024. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02220-8. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
The role of training and education for enhancing empathy among healthcare students: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.培训与教育在增强医学生同理心方面的作用:随机对照试验的系统评价
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07038-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Perceptions of Clinician's Empathy: Measurement and Psychometrics.患者对临床医生同理心的认知:测量与心理测量学
J Patient Exp. 2017 Jun;4(2):78-83. doi: 10.1177/2374373517699273. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
2
Enhancing Student Empathetic Engagement, History-Taking, and Communication Skills During Electronic Medical Record Use in Patient Care.在患者护理中使用电子病历期间提高学生的共情参与度、病史采集能力和沟通技巧。
Acad Med. 2017 Jul;92(7):1022-1027. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001476.
3
Empathic nonverbal behavior increases ratings of both warmth and competence in a medical context.
在医疗环境中,共情性的非语言行为会提高温暖感和能力的评分。
PLoS One. 2017 May 15;12(5):e0177758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177758. eCollection 2017.
4
Assessing Empathic Attitudes in Medical Students: The Re-validation of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student Version Report.评估医学生的共情态度:杰斐逊共情量表-学生版报告的重新验证
Zdr Varst. 2015 Sep 25;54(4):282-92. doi: 10.1515/sjph-2015-0037. eCollection 2015 Dec.
5
Empathy: what does it mean for GPs? A qualitative study.同理心:对全科医生而言意味着什么?一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2015 Feb;32(1):94-100. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu080. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
6
E.M.P.A.T.H.Y.: a tool to enhance nonverbal communication between clinicians and their patients.共情:一种增强临床医生与患者之间非言语沟通的工具。
Acad Med. 2014 Aug;89(8):1108-12. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000287.
7
The influence of the patient-clinician relationship on healthcare outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.患者与临床医生关系对医疗结果的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 9;9(4):e94207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094207. eCollection 2014.
8
Motivated empathy: the mechanics of the empathic gaze.动机性共情:共情凝视的机制
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(8):1522-30. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.890563. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
9
Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review.向医学生传授同理心:更新的系统评价。
Acad Med. 2013 Aug;88(8):1171-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299f3e3.
10
Medical students' understanding of empathy: a phenomenological study.医学生对同理心的理解:一项现象学研究。
Med Educ. 2012 Mar;46(3):306-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04152.x.