• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头颈部癌容积调强弧形放疗的实时交互式计划

Real-time interactive planning for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

作者信息

Baker Lindsey, Olson Robert, Braich Taran, Koulis Theodora, Ye Allison, Ahmed Nisar, Tran Eric, Lawyer Kim, Otto Karl, Smith Sally, Mestrovic Ante, Matthews Quinn

机构信息

Department of Radiation Therapy, BC Cancer - Centre for the North, 1215 Lethbridge St, Prince George, BC V2M 7E9, Canada.

Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Centre for the North, 1215 Lethbridge St, Prince George, BC V2M 7E9, Canada.

出版信息

Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Apr 4;9:83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.03.002. eCollection 2019 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.phro.2019.03.002
PMID:33458430
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7807618/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Planning complex radiotherapy treatments can be inefficient, with large variation in plan quality. In this study we evaluated plan quality and planning efficiency using real-time interactive planning (RTIP) for head and neck (HN) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RTIP allows manipulation of dose volume histograms (DVHs) in real-time to assess achievable planning target volume (PTV) coverage and organ at risk (OAR) sparing. For 20 HN patients previously treated with VMAT, RTIP was used to minimize OAR dose while maintaining PTV coverage. RTIP DVHs were used to guide VMAT optimization. Dosimetric differences between RTIP-assisted plans and original clinical plans were assessed. Five blinded radiation oncologists indicated their preference for each PTV, OAR and overall plan. To assess efficiency, ten patients were planned by experienced and novice planners and a RTIP user.

RESULTS

The average planning time with RTIP was <20 min, and most plans required only one optimization. All 20 RTIP plans were preferred by a majority of oncologists due to improvements in OAR sparing. The average maximum dose to the spinal cord was reduced by 10.5 Gy (from 49.5 to 39.0 Gy), and the average mean doses for the oral cavity, laryngopharynx, contralateral parotid and submandibular glands were reduced by 3.5 Gy (39.1-35.7 Gy), 6.8 Gy (42.5-35.7 Gy), 1.7 Gy (17.0-15.3 Gy) and 3.3 Gy (22.9-19.5 Gy), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating RTIP into clinical workflows may increase both planning efficiency and OAR sparing.

摘要

背景与目的

复杂放疗计划的制定可能效率低下,计划质量差异很大。在本研究中,我们使用头颈部(HN)容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)的实时交互式计划(RTIP)评估计划质量和计划效率。

材料与方法

RTIP允许实时操作剂量体积直方图(DVH),以评估可实现的计划靶体积(PTV)覆盖范围和危及器官(OAR)的保护情况。对于20例先前接受VMAT治疗的HN患者,使用RTIP在维持PTV覆盖的同时尽量减少OAR剂量。RTIP DVH用于指导VMAT优化。评估RTIP辅助计划与原始临床计划之间的剂量差异。五位不知情的放射肿瘤学家表明了他们对每个PTV、OAR和总体计划的偏好。为评估效率,由经验丰富的和新手计划者以及一名RTIP用户为10例患者制定计划。

结果

使用RTIP的平均计划时间<20分钟,大多数计划仅需一次优化。由于OAR保护得到改善,所有20个RTIP计划都得到了大多数肿瘤学家的青睐。脊髓的平均最大剂量降低了10.5 Gy(从49.5降至39.0 Gy),口腔、下咽、对侧腮腺和下颌下腺的平均平均剂量分别降低了3.5 Gy(39.1 - 35.7 Gy)、6.8 Gy(42.5 - 35.7 Gy)、1.7 Gy(17.0 - 15.3 Gy)和3.3 Gy(22.9 - 19.5 Gy)。

结论

将RTIP纳入临床工作流程可能会提高计划效率并改善OAR保护。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08e2/7807618/48b84c9e809c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08e2/7807618/04cc814e8c5b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08e2/7807618/48b84c9e809c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08e2/7807618/04cc814e8c5b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08e2/7807618/48b84c9e809c/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-time interactive planning for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy.头颈部癌容积调强弧形放疗的实时交互式计划
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Apr 4;9:83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.03.002. eCollection 2019 Jan.
2
On the use of volumetric-modulated arc therapy for single-fraction thoracic vertebral metastases stereotactic body radiosurgery.容积调强弧形治疗在单次分割胸椎转移瘤立体定向体部放射治疗中的应用
Med Dosim. 2017;42(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
3
A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs-at-risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning.一种预估危及器官最佳可行剂量体积直方图的方法:对头颈部容积旋转调强计划的验证。
Med Phys. 2017 Oct;44(10):5486-5497. doi: 10.1002/mp.12500. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
4
Assessment of PlanIQ Feasibility DVH for head and neck treatment planning.对头颈部治疗计划进行PlanIQ可行性剂量体积直方图评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Sep;18(5):245-250. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12165. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
5
A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.对头颈部癌患者采用调强放射治疗时,等间距射束(ESB)、射束角度优化(BAO)和容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)的剂量学比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Nov;20(11):121-130. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12748. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
6
Composite minimax robust optimization of VMAT improves target coverage and reduces non-target dose in head and neck cancer patients.调强适形放疗(VMAT)的复合最小最大稳健优化可改善头颈部癌症患者的靶区覆盖并降低非靶区剂量。
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Jul;136:71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
7
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.容积旋转调强弧形治疗与常规调强适形放疗在食管癌中的比较:一项治疗计划的比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 7;18(37):5266-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5266.
8
Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.使用靶向稀疏优化进行剂量塑形。
Med Phys. 2013 Jul;40(7):071711. doi: 10.1118/1.4808363.
9
Effectiveness of Multi-Criteria Optimization-based Trade-Off exploration in combination with RapidPlan for head & neck radiotherapy planning.基于多准则优化的权衡探索与 RapidPlan 联合应用于头颈部放疗计划的有效性。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Nov 23;13(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1175-y.
10
A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and non-coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)与非共面调强放疗(IMRT)治疗鼻腔和鼻窦癌的剂量学比较
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Aug 30;9:193. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-193.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced treatment planning strategies to enhance quality and efficiency of radiotherapy.提高放射治疗质量和效率的先进治疗计划策略。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Sep 13;11:69-70. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.09.002. eCollection 2019 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans.自动治疗计划可提高头颈癌治疗计划的临床质量。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2016 Sep 19;1:2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2016.08.001. eCollection 2016 Dec.
2
Multicriteria plan optimization in the hands of physicians: a pilot study in prostate cancer and brain tumors.多准则计划优化在医生手中:前列腺癌和脑肿瘤的初步研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov 6;12(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0903-z.
3
Performance of Knowledge-Based Radiation Therapy Planning for the Glioblastoma Disease Site.
基于知识的胶质母细胞瘤病损部位放射治疗计划的性能
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Nov 15;99(4):1021-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
4
A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs-at-risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning.一种预估危及器官最佳可行剂量体积直方图的方法:对头颈部容积旋转调强计划的验证。
Med Phys. 2017 Oct;44(10):5486-5497. doi: 10.1002/mp.12500. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
5
Fully automated treatment planning for head and neck radiotherapy using a voxel-based dose prediction and dose mimicking method.使用基于体素的剂量预测和剂量模拟方法对头颈部放射治疗进行全自动治疗计划。
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jul 6;62(15):5926-5944. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa71f8.
6
RapidPlan head and neck model: the objectives and possible clinical benefit.快速计划头颈模型:目标及可能的临床益处。
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Apr 27;12(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0808-x.
7
Fully automated treatment planning of spinal metastases - A comparison to manual planning of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for conventionally fractionated irradiation.脊柱转移瘤的全自动治疗计划——与容积调强弧形放疗常规分割照射的手动计划对比
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan 31;12(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0767-2.
8
Development of an autonomous treatment planning strategy for radiation therapy with effective use of population-based prior data.利用基于人群的先验数据有效开发放射治疗自主治疗计划策略。
Med Phys. 2017 Feb;44(2):389-396. doi: 10.1002/mp.12058. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
9
Clinical validation and benchmarking of knowledge-based IMRT and VMAT treatment planning in pelvic anatomy.盆腔解剖中基于知识的调强放射治疗(IMRT)和容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)治疗计划的临床验证与基准测试
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Sep;120(3):473-479. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
10
Comparison of Planning Quality and Efficiency Between Conventional and Knowledge-based Algorithms in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.基于知识的算法与传统算法在鼻咽癌患者调强放射治疗中计划质量和效率的比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Jul 1;95(3):981-990. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Feb 12.