van der Gracht Esmé T I, Beyrend Guillaume, Abdelaal Tamim, Pardieck Iris N, Wesselink Thomas H, van Haften Floortje J, van Duikeren Suzanne, Koning Frits, Arens Ramon
Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333ZA, the Netherlands.
Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2628XE, the Netherlands.
iScience. 2020 Dec 16;24(1):101954. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101954. eCollection 2021 Jan 22.
Factors that govern the complex formation of memory T cells are not completely understood. A better understanding of the development of memory T cell heterogeneity is however required to enhance vaccination and immunotherapy approaches. Here we examined the impact of pathogen- and tissue-specific cues on memory CD8 T cell heterogeneity using high-dimensional single-cell mass cytometry and a tailored bioinformatics pipeline. We identified distinct populations of pathogen-specific CD8 T cells that uniquely connected to a specific pathogen or associated to multiple types of acute and persistent infections. In addition, the tissue environment shaped the memory CD8 T cell heterogeneity, albeit to a lesser extent than infection. The programming of memory CD8 T cell differentiation during acute infection is eventually superseded by persistent infection. Thus, the plethora of distinct memory CD8 T cell subsets that arise upon infection is dominantly sculpted by the pathogen-specific cues and further shaped by the tissue environment.
调控记忆性T细胞复杂形成的因素尚未完全明确。然而,为了改进疫苗接种和免疫治疗方法,需要更好地理解记忆性T细胞异质性的发展过程。在此,我们使用高维单细胞质谱流式细胞术和定制的生物信息学流程,研究了病原体特异性和组织特异性线索对记忆性CD8 T细胞异质性的影响。我们鉴定出了不同的病原体特异性CD8 T细胞群体,它们分别与特定病原体独特相关,或与多种急性和持续性感染相关。此外,组织环境塑造了记忆性CD8 T细胞的异质性,尽管其影响程度小于感染。急性感染期间记忆性CD8 T细胞分化的编程最终被持续性感染所取代。因此,感染后出现的大量不同记忆性CD8 T细胞亚群主要由病原体特异性线索塑造,并进一步受组织环境影响。