American Red Cross, Biomedical Services Headquarters, Washington, DC, USA.
Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Transfusion. 2021 May;61(5):1471-1478. doi: 10.1111/trf.16286. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
With coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) offering an early treatment option for COVID-19, blood collectors needed to quickly overcome obstacles to recruiting and qualifying eligible donors. We provide attributes of CCP donors and products and compare to standard donors and products.
Information on CCP donors was gathered from the American Red Cross qualification website through product collection. Data from 2019 for standard plasma/platelet apheresis (SA) and whole blood (WB) donor demographics and SA donations including product disposition and reactions were used for comparison.
Of almost 59 000 donors registering on the website, 75% reported an existing COVID-19 diagnostic polymerase chain reaction or an antibody test. The majority (56.2%) of 10 231 CCP donors were first-time donors in contrast to SA or WB donor populations, which were only 3.0% and 30.6%, respectively, first-time donors. The number of female donors was 12% higher than SA donors. Older (≥ 65 years) and younger (16-19 years) were comparatively underrepresented in CCP donors. Deferral (10.2%) and Quantity Not Sufficient rates (6.4%) for presenting CCP donations were higher than SA (8.2% and 1.1%, respectively). Human leukocyte antigen antibody reactivity was the highest cause of product loss for CCP donations vs SA donations (9.6% vs 1.3%). Acute adverse events also occurred at a higher rate among both first-time and repeat CCP donations compared to SA.
CCP donors were more likely to be first-time and female donors than WB or SA donors. CCP donations had a higher rate of donor adverse reactions, deferrals, and product loss than SA donations.
随着 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)恢复期血浆(CCP)成为 COVID-19 的早期治疗选择,采血人员需要迅速克服招募和确定合格献血者的障碍。我们提供 CCP 献血者的特征和产品,并与标准献血者和产品进行比较。
通过产品采集,从美国红十字会资格网站收集 CCP 献血者的信息。使用 2019 年标准血浆/血小板单采术(SA)和全血(WB)献血者人口统计学和 SA 捐献的数据,包括产品处置和反应,进行比较。
在网站上注册的近 59000 名献血者中,75%报告了现有的 COVID-19 诊断聚合酶链反应或抗体检测。与 SA 或 WB 献血者群体相比,大多数(56.2%)10231 名 CCP 献血者为首次献血者,而 SA 或 WB 献血者群体中仅分别有 3.0%和 30.6%为首次献血者。女性献血者的数量比 SA 献血者多 12%。年龄较大(≥65 岁)和年龄较小(16-19 岁)的 CCP 献血者相对较少。与 SA 相比,呈交 CCP 捐献的延期(10.2%)和数量不足率(6.4%)更高。CCP 捐献物人类白细胞抗原抗体反应性是导致 CCP 捐献物产品损失的最高原因,而 SA 捐献物则为 9.6%对 1.3%。首次和重复 CCP 捐献的急性不良事件发生率也高于 SA。
CCP 献血者比 WB 或 SA 献血者更有可能是首次献血者和女性献血者。与 SA 捐献相比,CCP 捐献的献血者不良反应、延期和产品损失率更高。