• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压配型全髋关节置换术陶瓷对陶瓷界面早期失败的潜在原因,那么那些存活下来的患者呢:十年随访研究。

Ceramic-on-ceramic articulation in press-fit total hip arthroplasty as a potential reason for early failure, what about the survivors: a ten year follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Xpert Clinics/SCORE (Specialized Center of Orthopedic Research and Education), Laarderhoogtweg 12, 1101EA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 15, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2021 Jun;45(6):1447-1454. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04895-1. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00264-020-04895-1
PMID:33459828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8178149/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In press-fit total hip arthroplasty (THA), primary stability is needed to avoid micromotion and hereby aseptic loosening, the main reason for early revision. High aseptic loosening revision rates of the seleXys TH+ cup (Mathys Medical) with Ceramys ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing are seen in literature. Since CoC is presumed to overcome long-term wear-related revisions, the reason for early failure of this cup is important to clarify. The aim is to investigate its ten year outcomes and differentiate between potential causes and identify risk factors for aseptic loosening.

METHODS

Retrospective screening of a prospectively documented series of 315 THAs was performed. Primary outcome was cumulative incidence of cup revision due to aseptic loosening. Secondary outcomes were component revision and reoperation. Additionally, potential predictive factors for aseptic loosening were evaluated.

RESULTS

At the median follow-up of 9.7 years [IQR 4.4; 10.3], 48 TH+ (15.2%) were revised due to aseptic loosening. Competing risk analysis showed a ten year cumulative incidence of cup revision due to aseptic loosening of 15.6% (95% CI 12.0-20.2). Stabilization of early revision rates was observed, following a high rate of respectively 81.3% (n = 39) and 95.8% (n = 46) within the first two and three years. No significant predictive factors for aseptic loosening were found.

CONCLUSION

The ten year results of seleXys TH+ cup with Ceramys CoC bearing showed an unacceptable high aseptic loosening rate, which stabilized over time after a high early failure incidence. This could be attributed to a problem with osseointegration during the transition of primary to definitive stability.

摘要

目的

在压配式全髋关节置换术(THA)中,需要初始稳定性以避免微动,从而避免无菌性松动,这是早期翻修的主要原因。在文献中,SeleXys TH+ 杯(Mathys Medical)与 Ceramys 陶瓷对陶瓷(CoC)轴承的高无菌性松动翻修率。由于 CoC 被认为可以克服与长期磨损相关的翻修,因此明确这种杯子早期失效的原因很重要。目的是调查其十年结果,并区分潜在原因,确定无菌性松动的危险因素。

方法

对前瞻性记录的 315 例 THA 进行回顾性筛选。主要结果是因无菌性松动而导致的杯子翻修的累积发生率。次要结果是部件翻修和再次手术。此外,还评估了潜在的无菌性松动预测因素。

结果

在中位数随访 9.7 年[IQR 4.4; 10.3]时,有 48 例 TH+(15.2%)因无菌性松动而翻修。竞争风险分析显示,十年累积无菌性松动杯翻修发生率为 15.6%(95%CI 12.0-20.2)。在最初的两年和三年内,分别有 81.3%(n=39)和 95.8%(n=46)的早期翻修率很高,观察到早期翻修率稳定。未发现无菌性松动的显著预测因素。

结论

SeleXys TH+ 杯与 Ceramys CoC 轴承的十年结果显示出不可接受的高无菌性松动率,在早期高失败发生率后,随着时间的推移逐渐稳定。这可能归因于在从初始稳定性到最终稳定性的过渡过程中出现了骨整合问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4857/8178149/4bdad963e92a/264_2020_4895_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4857/8178149/73f1604ed451/264_2020_4895_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4857/8178149/ae389ff20950/264_2020_4895_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4857/8178149/02afa2f1751f/264_2020_4895_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4857/8178149/4bdad963e92a/264_2020_4895_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4857/8178149/73f1604ed451/264_2020_4895_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4857/8178149/ae389ff20950/264_2020_4895_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4857/8178149/02afa2f1751f/264_2020_4895_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4857/8178149/4bdad963e92a/264_2020_4895_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Ceramic-on-ceramic articulation in press-fit total hip arthroplasty as a potential reason for early failure, what about the survivors: a ten year follow-up.压配型全髋关节置换术陶瓷对陶瓷界面早期失败的潜在原因,那么那些存活下来的患者呢:十年随访研究。
Int Orthop. 2021 Jun;45(6):1447-1454. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04895-1. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
2
Higher risk of 2-year cup revision of ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing: analysis of 33,454 primary press-fit total hip arthroplasties registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).陶瓷对陶瓷与陶瓷对聚乙烯轴承相比,2 年翻修杯的风险更高:荷兰关节置换注册处(LROI)登记的 33454 例初次压配全髋关节置换术的分析。
Hip Int. 2023 Mar;33(2):280-287. doi: 10.1177/11207000211064975. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
3
Early loosening of a press-fit cup with ceramic-on-ceramic articulation: our early results.压配杯陶瓷-陶瓷关节早期松动:我们的早期结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Dec;133(12):1757-62. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1861-z. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
4
Ceramic-on-ceramic cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients aged 40 years or under: Do preoperative conditions affect long-term results?40 岁及以下患者行陶瓷-陶瓷非骨水泥全髋关节置换术:术前条件是否影响长期结果?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Feb;107(1):102763. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102763. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
5
Low aseptic loosening and revision rate in Zweymüller-Plus total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.采用陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的Zweymüller-Plus全髋关节置换术的无菌性松动和翻修率较低。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Dec;24(8):1439-45. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1314-y.
6
Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷关节翻修的原因与其他假体有差异吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2190-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4917-x.
7
Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up.8 年随访后,初次全髋关节置换术的患者中,金属对金属 Ultamet 比陶瓷对陶瓷的存活率相同,但骨溶解率更高。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Dec;104(8):1155-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
8
Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.比较使用传统聚乙烯、金属对金属或陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的髋关节假体十年生存率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 3;94(19):1756-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01858.
9
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.全髋关节置换术中不同轴承的结果——植入物存活率、翻修原因及患者报告的结果。
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
10
Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years.20岁以下患者的陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换植入物
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):520-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4546-9. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical analysis of a short femoral stem used in revision total hip replacement of a standard femoral stem.用于标准股骨柄翻修全髋关节置换的短股骨柄的生物力学分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):1967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86108-6.
2
Comparison of 5-year cup and stem migration between ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing in press-fit total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis.压配型全髋关节置换术陶瓷-陶瓷和陶瓷-聚乙烯关节中使用放射学立体定向分析比较 5 年杯和柄的迁移:一项随机对照试验。
Hip Int. 2024 Nov;34(6):701-716. doi: 10.1177/11207000241265653. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Recent updates for biomaterials used in total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中生物材料的最新进展。
Biomater Res. 2018 Dec 5;22:33. doi: 10.1186/s40824-018-0144-8. eCollection 2018.
2
Changes in periacetabular bone mineral density five years after resurfacing hip arthroplasty versus conventional total hip arthroplasty.髋关节表面置换术与传统全髋关节置换术后五年髋臼周围骨密度的变化。
Hip Int. 2019 Mar;29(2):153-160. doi: 10.1177/1120700018808023. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
3
Current methods of preventing aseptic loosening and improving osseointegration of titanium implants in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a review.
Bionic reconstruction of tension trabeculae in short-stem hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis.
短柄髋关节置换术中张力小梁的仿生重建:有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Feb 2;24(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06205-3.
4
Revision in Ceramic-on-Ceramic and Ceramic-on-Polyethylene Bearing in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with Press-fit Cups: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Different Methodological Study Designs.初次全髋关节置换中采用压配型髋臼杯的陶瓷对陶瓷和陶瓷对聚乙烯关节面的翻修:不同方法学研究设计的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Nov;10(11):916-936. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2022.59354.2933.
5
Clinical results at 10 years of minimum follow-up with the ABG 2 hip arthroplasty, matched with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.采用ABG 2髋关节置换术并匹配陶瓷对陶瓷轴承,进行至少10年随访的临床结果。
SICOT J. 2022;8:32. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2022032. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
6
Comparison of early migration patterns between a ceramic and polyethylene liner in uncemented Trabecular Titanium cups: a 2-year randomized controlled trial of 52 hips using radiostereometric analysis.在未固定的 Trabecular Titanium 杯中外层陶瓷与聚乙烯衬垫早期迁移模式的比较:52 髋使用放射学体层摄影术分析的 2 年随机对照试验。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Apr 28;93:451-458. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2267.
7
Higher risk of 2-year cup revision of ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing: analysis of 33,454 primary press-fit total hip arthroplasties registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).陶瓷对陶瓷与陶瓷对聚乙烯轴承相比,2 年翻修杯的风险更高:荷兰关节置换注册处(LROI)登记的 33454 例初次压配全髋关节置换术的分析。
Hip Int. 2023 Mar;33(2):280-287. doi: 10.1177/11207000211064975. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术中预防钛植入物无菌性松动及改善骨整合的当前方法:综述
J Int Med Res. 2018 Jun;46(6):2104-2119. doi: 10.1177/0300060517732697. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
4
Assessing the Acetabular Cup Implant Primary Stability by Impact Analyses: A Cadaveric Study.通过冲击分析评估髋臼杯植入物的初始稳定性:一项尸体研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 28;11(11):e0166778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166778. eCollection 2016.
5
High failure rate of a new pressfit cup in mid-term follow-up.新型压配式髋臼杯在中期随访中的高失败率。
Int Orthop. 2015 Sep;39(9):1813-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2872-x. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
6
Porous titanium construct cup compared to porous coated titanium cup in total hip arthroplasty. A randomised controlled trial.全髋关节置换术中多孔钛结构髋臼杯与多孔涂层钛杯的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Int Orthop. 2015 May;39(5):823-32. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2571-z. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
7
Does surface roughness influence the primary stability of acetabular cups? A numerical and experimental biomechanical evaluation.髋臼杯的表面粗糙度会影响其初始稳定性吗?一项数值与实验性生物力学评估。
Med Eng Phys. 2014 Sep;36(9):1185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
8
10-year results of the uncemented Allofit press-fit cup in young patients.非骨水泥型Allofit压配髋臼杯在年轻患者中的10年随访结果
Acta Orthop. 2014 Aug;85(4):368-74. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.925351. Epub 2014 May 30.
9
Poor outcome of a spherical pressfit cup with a modern ceramic liner: a prospective cohort study of 181 cups.采用现代陶瓷内衬的球形压配髋臼杯预后不佳:一项针对181个髋臼杯的前瞻性队列研究
Hip Int. 2014 Jul-Aug;24(4):333-9. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000130. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
10
Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: minimum of six-year follow-up study.陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术:至少六年的随访研究。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2013 Sep;5(3):174-9. doi: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.3.174. Epub 2013 Aug 20.