Department of Psychology and Institute for Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2021 Jun;46(2):135-140. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09502-y. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
One of the first things one learns in a basic psychology or statistics course is that you cannot prove the null hypothesis that there is no difference between two conditions such as a patient group and a normal control group. This remains true. However now, thanks to ongoing progress by a special group of devoted methodologists, even when the result of an inferential test is p > .05, it is now possible to rigorously and quantitatively conclude that (a) the null hypothesis is actually unlikely, and (b) that the alternative hypothesis of an actual difference between treatment and control is more probable than the null. Alternatively, it is also possible to conclude quantitatively that the null hypothesis is much more likely than the alternative. Without Bayesian statistics, we couldn't say anything if a simple inferential analysis like a t-test yielded p > .05. The present, mostly non-quantitative article describes free resources and illustrative procedures for doing Bayesian analysis, with t-test and ANOVA examples.
在基础心理学或统计学课程中,人们首先学到的一件事就是,您无法证明两个条件(例如患者组和正常对照组)之间没有差异的零假设。这仍然是正确的。然而,现在,由于一群专门的方法学家的持续努力,即使推断性检验的结果为 p > 0.05,现在也可以严格和定量地得出结论:(a) 零假设实际上不太可能,并且 (b) 治疗和对照之间实际存在差异的替代假设比零假设更有可能。或者,也可以定量得出结论,零假设比替代假设更有可能。如果简单的推断分析(如 t 检验)产生 p > 0.05,那么没有贝叶斯统计学,我们就无法说任何话。本文主要是非定量的,介绍了进行贝叶斯分析的免费资源和说明性程序,以及 t 检验和 ANOVA 的示例。