• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CEBHA+ 综合知识转化方法的混合方法评价:研究方案。

Mixed method evaluation of the CEBHA+ integrated knowledge translation approach: a protocol.

机构信息

Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jan 18;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00675-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-020-00675-w
PMID:33461592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7813167/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Collaboration for Evidence-based Healthcare and Public Health in Africa (CEBHA+) is a research consortium concerned with the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of non-communicable diseases. CEBHA+ seeks to engage policymakers and practitioners throughout the research process in order to build lasting relationships, enhance evidence uptake, and create long-term capacity among partner institutions in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, South Africa and Uganda in collaboration with two German universities. This integrated knowledge translation (IKT) approach includes the formal development, implementation and evaluation of country specific IKT strategies.

METHODS

We have conceptualised the CEBHA+ IKT approach as a complex intervention in a complex system. We will employ a comparative case study (CCS) design and mixed methods to facilitate an in-depth evaluation. We will use quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews, quarterly updates, and a policy document analysis to capture the process and outcomes of IKT across the African CEBHA+ partner sites. We will conduct an early stage (early 2020) and a late-stage evaluation (early 2022), triangulate the data collected with various methods at each site and subsequently compare our findings across the five sites.

DISCUSSION

Evaluating a complex intervention such as the CEBHA+ IKT approach is complicated, even more so when undertaken across five diverse countries. Despite conceptual, methodological and practical challenges, our comparative case study addresses important evidence gaps: While involving decision-makers in the research process is gaining traction worldwide, we still know very little regarding (i) whether this approach really makes a difference to evidence uptake, (ii) the mechanisms that make IKT successful, and (iii) relevant differences across socio-cultural contexts. The evaluation described here is intended to provide relevant insights on all of these aspects, notably in countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, and is expected to contribute to the science of IKT overall.

摘要

背景

促进非洲循证卫生保健和公共卫生合作组织(CEBHA+)是一个关注非传染性疾病预防、诊断和治疗的研究联盟。CEBHA+ 力求在整个研究过程中让政策制定者和实践者参与进来,以建立持久的关系、增强证据的采用,并在与两所德国大学合作的基础上,在埃塞俄比亚、马拉维、卢旺达、南非和乌干达的合作伙伴机构中建立长期能力。这种综合知识转化(IKT)方法包括制定、实施和评估国家特定的 IKT 战略。

方法

我们将 CEBHA+IKT 方法视为复杂系统中的复杂干预措施。我们将采用比较案例研究(CCS)设计和混合方法来促进深入评估。我们将使用定量调查、定性访谈、季度更新和政策文件分析来捕捉非洲 CEBHA+合作伙伴站点的 IKT 过程和结果。我们将进行早期(2020 年初)和晚期(2022 年初)评估,对每个站点使用各种方法收集的数据进行三角分析,然后在五个站点之间比较我们的发现。

讨论

评估 CEBHA+IKT 方法等复杂干预措施很复杂,在五个不同国家进行时更是如此。尽管存在概念、方法和实践方面的挑战,但我们的比较案例研究解决了重要的证据差距:虽然让决策者参与研究过程在全球范围内得到了关注,但我们仍然对以下方面知之甚少:(i)这种方法是否真的对证据的采用有影响,(ii)使 IKT 成功的机制,以及(iii)跨社会文化背景的相关差异。这里描述的评估旨在提供所有这些方面的相关见解,特别是在撒哈拉以南非洲国家,并有望对 IKT 整体科学做出贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370a/7814563/90691013d8c2/12961_2020_675_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370a/7814563/054dec3e549a/12961_2020_675_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370a/7814563/9d0f06891f67/12961_2020_675_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370a/7814563/90691013d8c2/12961_2020_675_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370a/7814563/054dec3e549a/12961_2020_675_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370a/7814563/9d0f06891f67/12961_2020_675_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370a/7814563/90691013d8c2/12961_2020_675_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mixed method evaluation of the CEBHA+ integrated knowledge translation approach: a protocol.CEBHA+ 综合知识转化方法的混合方法评价:研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jan 18;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00675-w.
2
Developing, implementing, and monitoring tailored strategies for integrated knowledge translation in five sub-Saharan African countries.在五个撒哈拉以南非洲国家制定、实施和监测有针对性的综合知识转化策略。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Sep 4;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01038-x.
3
Integrated knowledge translation to advance noncommunicable disease policy and practice in South Africa: application of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework.整合知识转化以推进南非非传染性疾病政策与实践:探索、准备、实施与维持(EPIS)框架的应用
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 May 17;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00733-x.
4
Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation.将知识转化为行动,以实现更有效的实践、项目和政策:综合知识转化研究计划方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 2;13(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0700-y.
5
Integrated Knowledge Translation for Non-Communicable Diseases: Stories from Sub-Saharan Africa.非传染性疾病综合知识转化:来自撒哈拉以南非洲的故事。
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Dec 8;89(1):87. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4228. eCollection 2023.
6
Developing and planning country-specific integrated knowledge translation strategies: experiences from the GELA project in Malawi, Nigeria, and South Africa.制定和规划具有国家特色的综合知识转化策略:来自马拉维、尼日利亚和南非 GELA 项目的经验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 27;24(1):1418. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18934-8.
7
Identifying the conditions needed for integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care organizations: qualitative interviews with researchers and research users.确定医疗保健机构中整合知识转化(IKT)所需的条件:对研究人员和研究使用者的定性访谈
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 12;16:256. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1533-0.
8
How does context influence collaborative decision-making for health services planning, delivery and evaluation?背景如何影响卫生服务规划、提供和评估中的协作决策?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 19;14:545. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0545-x.
9
Implementing and Evaluating Community Health Worker-Led Cardiovascular Disease Risk Screening Intervention in Sub-Saharan Africa Communities: A Participatory Implementation Research Protocol.实施和评估撒哈拉以南非洲社区中社区卫生工作者主导的心血管疾病风险筛查干预措施:一项参与式实施研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 24;20(1):298. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010298.
10
Building an integrated knowledge translation (IKT) evidence base: colloquium proceedings and research direction.构建综合知识转化(IKT)证据基础:专题讨论会论文集和研究方向。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jan 20;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0521-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of an integrated knowledge translation approach in five African countries: a mixed-methods comparative case study.五个非洲国家综合知识转化方法的成果:一项混合方法比较案例研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 10;22(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01256-x.
2
Developing and planning country-specific integrated knowledge translation strategies: experiences from the GELA project in Malawi, Nigeria, and South Africa.制定和规划具有国家特色的综合知识转化策略:来自马拉维、尼日利亚和南非 GELA 项目的经验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 27;24(1):1418. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18934-8.
3
Multi-country collaborative citizen science projects to co-design cardiovascular disease prevention strategies and advocacy: findings from Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, and South Africa.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the evolution of engagement between academic public health researchers and decision-makers: from initiation to dissolution.探索学术公共卫生研究人员与决策者之间的参与演变:从启动到解散。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 10;18(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0516-0.
2
University Curricula in Evidence-Informed Decision Making and Knowledge Translation: Integrating Best Practice, Innovation, and Experience for Effective Teaching and Learning.循证决策与知识转化的大学课程:整合最佳实践、创新与经验以实现有效教学与学习
Front Public Health. 2019 Dec 3;7:313. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00313. eCollection 2019.
3
多国家合作的公民科学项目共同设计心血管疾病预防策略和宣传:来自埃塞俄比亚、马拉维、卢旺达和南非的研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 12;23(1):2484. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17393-x.
4
Integrated Knowledge Translation for Non-Communicable Diseases: Stories from Sub-Saharan Africa.非传染性疾病综合知识转化:来自撒哈拉以南非洲的故事。
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Dec 8;89(1):87. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4228. eCollection 2023.
5
Developing, implementing, and monitoring tailored strategies for integrated knowledge translation in five sub-Saharan African countries.在五个撒哈拉以南非洲国家制定、实施和监测有针对性的综合知识转化策略。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Sep 4;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01038-x.
6
Integrated knowledge translation to advance noncommunicable disease policy and practice in South Africa: application of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework.整合知识转化以推进南非非传染性疾病政策与实践:探索、准备、实施与维持(EPIS)框架的应用
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 May 17;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00733-x.
Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers.
探索研究合作生产的前沿:综合知识转化研究网络概念论文。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Nov 25;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7.
4
Integrated Knowledge Translation with Public Health Policy Makers: A Scoping Review.与公共卫生政策制定者的综合知识转化:一项范围综述
Healthc Policy. 2019 Feb;14(3):55-77. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2019.25792.
5
Evidence map of knowledge translation strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers in African health systems.非洲卫生系统中知识转化策略、结果、促进因素和障碍的证据图谱。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Feb 7;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0419-0.
6
Advancing the evaluation of integrated knowledge translation.推进综合知识转化评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 6;16(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0383-0.
7
Mutual Distrust: Perspectives From Researchers and Policy Makers on the Research to Policy Gap in 2013 and Recommendations for the Future.相互不信任:研究人员和政策制定者对2013年研究与政策差距的看法及未来建议
Inquiry. 2017 Jan 1;54:46958017705465. doi: 10.1177/0046958017705465.
8
Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?循证决策不同于循证医学,那么在弥合证据与政策之间的差距方面,你应该走多远呢?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Apr 26;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0192-x.
9
Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework.理解情境与实施中的复杂性:复杂干预措施的情境与实施(CICI)框架
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 15;12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0552-5.
10
Development and validation of SEER (Seeking, Engaging with and Evaluating Research): a measure of policymakers' capacity to engage with and use research.SEER(寻求、参与和评估研究)的开发与验证:一项衡量政策制定者参与和利用研究能力的指标。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Jan 17;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0162-8.