• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用弯曲骨切除装置的经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合手术的经济分析

Economic Analysis of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Utilizing a Curved Bone Removal Device.

作者信息

Peloza John H, Millgram Michael A, Jacobian Erel, Kolsky Daniel E, Guyer Richard D, Le Huec Jean-Charles, Ashkenazi Ely

机构信息

Center for Spine Care, Dallas, TX, 75287, USA.

Israel Spine Center, Assuta Hospital, Assuta Medical Centers, 69710, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Sep;5(3):519-531. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00256-1. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1007/s41669-020-00256-1
PMID:33462767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8333172/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) represents a commonly performed spinal procedure that poses a significant financial burden on patients, hospitals and insurers. Reducing these costs, while maintaining efficacy, may be assisted by a new powered endplate preparation device, designed to shorten procedural time while offering positive impacts on other elements that contribute to the cost of care.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess and compare the individual cost elements of TLIF procedures with and without the use of the device, to determine whether application of this technology translated into any material procedural savings.

METHODS

The records of 208 single-level TLIF procedures in a single hospital were reviewed. Surgical time, length of hospital stay, blood loss, infection rate, and other parameters were compared for the cases where the device was used (device group; n = 143) and cases which used standard tools (control group; n = 65). The cost per unit of each element was derived from the literature, online resources, and the hospital's financial department.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed a shorter surgery duration in the device group (23 min, after controlling for procedure year and patient characteristics; statistically significant at p < 0.001) and lower complication and readmission rates (p = 0.67 and p = 0.21, respectively) associated with the use of the device, leading to a statistically significant cost reduction of approximately 2060 US dollars (US$) (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that use of the device may lead to a cost reduction and shorter procedure without deteriorating the clinical outcome.

摘要

背景

经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)是一种常见的脊柱手术,给患者、医院和保险公司带来了巨大的经济负担。一种新型的动力终板准备装置可能有助于降低这些成本,同时保持疗效,该装置旨在缩短手术时间,并对其他影响护理成本的因素产生积极影响。

目的

本研究的目的是评估和比较使用和不使用该装置的TLIF手术的各项成本要素,以确定该技术的应用是否能带来实际的手术成本节约。

方法

回顾了一家医院208例单节段TLIF手术的记录。比较了使用该装置的病例(装置组;n = 143)和使用标准工具的病例(对照组;n = 65)的手术时间、住院时间、失血量、感染率和其他参数。每个要素的单位成本来自文献、在线资源和医院财务部门。

结果

分析显示,装置组的手术时间较短(控制手术年份和患者特征后为23分钟;p < 0.001,具有统计学意义),使用该装置的并发症和再入院率较低(分别为p = 0.67和p = 0.21),导致成本显著降低约2060美元(p < 0.01)。

结论

该研究表明,使用该装置可能会降低成本、缩短手术时间,且不会使临床结果恶化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6903/8333172/043ecdf4a7a9/41669_2020_256_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6903/8333172/6e3c4cbf13b6/41669_2020_256_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6903/8333172/0f21a8dd1c85/41669_2020_256_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6903/8333172/043ecdf4a7a9/41669_2020_256_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6903/8333172/6e3c4cbf13b6/41669_2020_256_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6903/8333172/0f21a8dd1c85/41669_2020_256_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6903/8333172/043ecdf4a7a9/41669_2020_256_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic Analysis of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Utilizing a Curved Bone Removal Device.使用弯曲骨切除装置的经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合手术的经济分析
Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Sep;5(3):519-531. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00256-1. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis.腰椎经椎间孔椎体间融合术与前后路椎体间融合术的经济学分析
J Spinal Disord. 2001 Apr;14(2):100-3. doi: 10.1097/00002517-200104000-00002.
3
Cost analysis of anterior-posterior circumferential fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.前后环形融合与经椎间孔腰椎体间融合的成本分析。
Spine J. 2013 Jun;13(6):651-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.055. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
4
Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.使用N(2)QOD数据对经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与后路腰椎融合术治疗腰椎滑脱的成本效益进行建模分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):916-21. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15917. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
5
A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.一项比较单节段微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的围手术期成本分析。
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.053. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
6
Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients.微创与开放后路/经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后手术部位感染的对比分析:5170 例患者的医院计费和出院数据分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jun;14(6):771-8. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.SPINE10571. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
7
A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).一项腰椎滑脱症手术治疗的随机对照多中心试验方案:腰椎椎间融合试验(LIFT)。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Oct 6;17(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1280-8.
8
[Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].[象限通道下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度退行性腰椎滑脱症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Mar 25;32(3):199-206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.002.
9
Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的对比
Indian J Orthop. 2016 Sep;50(5):464-472. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.189607.
10
Comparison of (Partial) economic evaluations of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in adults with lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review.后路腰椎间融合术(PLIF)与经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎滑脱症成人的(部分)经济学评价比较:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0245963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245963. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The True Effect of a Lumbar Dural Tear on Complications and Cost.腰椎硬脊膜撕裂对并发症和成本的真正影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Feb 1;45(3):E155-E162. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003213.
2
Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.来自前瞻性质量结果数据库的426例1级腰椎滑脱患者单纯椎板切除术与融合术的对比研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Nov 30;30(2):234-241. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.SPINE17913. Print 2019 Feb 1.
3
Suitability of Administrative Databases for Durotomy Incidence Assessment: Comparison to the Incidence Associated With Bone-Removal Devices, Calculated Using a Systemic Literature Review and Clinical Data.
行政数据库用于硬膜切开术发生率评估的适用性:与使用系统文献综述和临床数据计算得出的与骨移除装置相关的发生率的比较。
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Aug 31;12(4):498-509. doi: 10.14444/5061. eCollection 2018 Aug.
4
Complications following single-level interbody fusion procedures: an ACS-NSQIP study.单节段椎间融合手术的并发症:一项美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)研究
J Spine Surg. 2018 Mar;4(1):17-27. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.03.19.
5
Thirty-Day Readmission Risk Factors Following Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for 4992 Patients From the ACS-NSQIP Database.来自美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库的4992例患者单节段经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)后30天再入院风险因素
Global Spine J. 2017 May;7(3):220-226. doi: 10.1177/2192568217694144. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
6
A retrospective review comparing two-year patient-reported outcomes, costs, and healthcare resource utilization for TLIF vs. PLF for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis.一项回顾性研究,比较经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)与后路腰椎融合术(PLF)治疗单节段退变性腰椎滑脱症的两年患者报告结局、成本及医疗资源利用情况。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Mar;27(3):661-669. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5142-3. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
7
An in vitro study examining a novel suction curette device for lumbar discectomy compared with standard manual discectomy.一项体外研究,比较了一种用于腰椎间盘切除术的新型吸引刮匙装置与标准手动椎间盘切除术。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Apr;26(4):454-458. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16283. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
8
Management and cost of surgical site infection in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis.脊柱转移瘤患者手术部位感染的管理和费用。
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Feb;95(2):148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
9
The True Cost of a Dural Tear: Medical and Economic Ramifications of Incidental Durotomy During Lumbar Discectomy in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries.硬脊膜撕裂的真实代价:老年 Medicare 受益人群行腰椎间盘切除术时偶然发生硬脊膜切开术的医疗和经济后果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 May 15;42(10):770-776. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001895.
10
Hospital and Payer Costs Associated With Surgical Complications.手术并发症相关的医院和支付方成本。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Sep 1;151(9):823-30. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0773.