Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):711-731. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01838-0. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
Visual categorization is fundamental to expertise in a wide variety of disparate domains, such as radiology, art history, and quality control. The pervasive need to master visual categories has served as the impetus for a vast body of research dedicated to exploring how to enhance the learning process. The literature is clear on one point: no category learning technique is always superior to another. In the present review, we discuss how two factors moderate the efficacy of learning techniques. The first, category similarity, refers to the degree of featural overlap of exemplars. The second moderator, category type, concerns whether the features that define category membership can be mastered through learning processes that are implicit/non-verbal (information-integration categories) or explicit/verbal (rule-based categories). The literature on each moderator has been conducted almost entirely in isolation, such that their potential interaction remains underexplored. We address this gap in the literature by reviewing empirical and theoretical evidence that these two moderators jointly influence the efficacy of learning techniques.
视觉分类对于各种不同领域的专业知识都是至关重要的,例如放射学、艺术史和质量控制。广泛需要掌握视觉类别,这为大量研究提供了动力,这些研究旨在探索如何增强学习过程。文献清楚地表明:没有一种类别学习技术总是优于另一种。在本综述中,我们讨论了两个因素如何调节学习技术的效果。第一个因素是类别相似性,指的是范例特征重叠的程度。第二个调节因素是类别类型,涉及定义类别成员资格的特征是否可以通过内隐/非言语的学习过程(信息整合类别)或外显/言语的学习过程(基于规则的类别)来掌握。关于每个调节因素的文献几乎都是孤立进行的,因此它们的潜在相互作用尚未得到充分探索。我们通过回顾实证和理论证据来解决文献中的这一空白,这些证据表明这两个调节因素共同影响学习技术的效果。