Saleh Ahmed A, Shukry Mustafa, Farrag Foad, Soliman Mohamed M, Abdel-Moneim Abdel-Moneim Eid
Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt.
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 5;11(1):83. doi: 10.3390/ani11010083.
The present study evaluated the effect of three feeding methods (dry feed, wet feed or wet feed fermented with ) on the growth performance, intestinal histomorphometry and gene expression of the lipid metabolism- and growth-related genes of broiler chickens. A total of 360 one-day-old Cobb-500 broiler chicks were randomly allotted into three groups containing four replicates with 30 birds each. The first group (control) was fed a dry mash basal diet. The second and third groups were fed wet feed and fermented wet feed. The final body weight and weight gain were reduced ( < 0.01) in the wet feed group, while they did not differ between the fermented wet feed and dry feed groups. Feed intake was not altered, and feeding on wet feed significantly ( < 0.01) increased the feed-to-gain ratio compared to the remaining groups. No differences between the three feeding methods in carcass characteristics, blood biochemistry and nutrient digestibility were observed except for crude protein digestibility, which was increased ( < 0.01) in the fermented wet feed group. Duodenal and ileal villi heights were elevated in birds fed fermented wet feeds, while crypt depth was not altered. The expression fold of , and m- genes in the pectoral muscle of birds fed wet feed was decreased ( < 0.05), while myostatin gene expression was elevated. Feeding on wet feed reduced the hepatic gene expression of and increased that of . In conclusion, wet feed negatively affected the broiler chickens' efficiency under heat stress; however, fermenting the wet feed with improved feed utilization and birds' performance compared to the dry feed group.
本研究评估了三种饲喂方法(干饲料、湿饲料或用[未提及具体发酵物]发酵的湿饲料)对肉鸡生长性能、肠道组织形态计量学以及脂质代谢和生长相关基因表达的影响。总共360只1日龄的科宝500肉鸡雏鸡被随机分为三组,每组四个重复,每组30只。第一组(对照组)饲喂干颗粒基础日粮。第二组和第三组分别饲喂湿饲料和发酵湿饲料。湿饲料组的最终体重和体重增加量降低(P<0.01),而发酵湿饲料组和干饲料组之间没有差异。采食量没有改变,与其他组相比,饲喂湿饲料显著(P<0.01)增加了料重比。除粗蛋白消化率在发酵湿饲料组有所提高(P<0.01)外,三种饲喂方法在胴体特性、血液生化和养分消化率方面没有差异。饲喂发酵湿饲料的鸡十二指肠和回肠绒毛高度升高,而隐窝深度没有改变。饲喂湿饲料的鸡胸肌中[未提及具体基因]、[未提及具体基因]和m-[未提及具体基因]基因的表达倍数降低(P<0.05),而肌生成抑制素基因表达升高。饲喂湿饲料降低了肝脏中[未提及具体基因]的基因表达并增加了[未提及具体基因]的表达。总之,在热应激条件下,湿饲料对肉鸡效率有负面影响;然而,与干饲料组相比,用[未提及具体发酵物]发酵湿饲料提高了饲料利用率和鸡的生产性能。