Pediatric and Neonatology Unit, Imola Hospital, 40026 Imola, Italy.
Pediatric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jan 14;57(1):67. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010067.
Hazelnuts are frequently involved in IgE-mediated reactions and represent the main culprit of nut allergy in Europe. The clinical presentation varies from mild symptoms limited to the oropharynx [oral allergy syndrome (OAS)], due to the cross-reaction with homologues in pollen allergens and more severe events caused by the primary sensitization to highly stable molecules contained in hazelnuts. The aim of this review is to summarize the most relevant concepts in the field of hazelnut allergy and to provide a practical approach useful in the clinical practice References were identified by PubMed searches dating from January 2000 up to November 2020 using the search terms: "component resolved diagnosis" and "Hazelnut allergy. The storage proteins Cor a 9 and Cor a 14 resulted highly specific for primary hazelnut allergy and strongly associated with severe reactions, while the cross reactive Cor a 1, an homolog of the birch Bet v1, were related to OAS. Any cut-off has shown a specificity and sensitivity pattern as high as to replace the oral food challenge (OFC), which still remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of hazelnut allergy. To date there is still no definitive treatment. Hazelnut free-diet and treatment of symptoms with emergency management, including the prescription of auto-injective epinephrine, still represent the main approach. Oral allergen immunotherapy (AIT) appears a promising therapeutic strategy and the definition of individual clinical threshold would be useful for sensitized individuals, caregivers, and physicians to reduce social limitation, anxiety, and better manage food allergy. An accurate diagnostic work-up including clinical history, in vivo and in vitro test including component resolved diagnosis and OFC are essential to confirm the diagnosis, to assess the risk of a severe reaction, and to prescribe an adequate diet and treatment.
榛子经常涉及 IgE 介导的反应,是欧洲坚果过敏的主要罪魁祸首。临床表现从局限于口咽部的轻度症状(口腔过敏综合征[OAS]),因与花粉过敏原中的同源物发生交叉反应,到因对包含在榛子中的高度稳定分子的主要致敏而引起更严重的事件,表现各异。本文综述的目的是总结榛子过敏领域的最相关概念,并提供在临床实践中有用的实用方法。
参考文献通过 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 11 月期间在 PubMed 上进行的搜索确定,使用的搜索词为:“成分解析诊断”和“榛子过敏”。
贮藏蛋白 Cor a 9 和 Cor a 14 对原发性榛子过敏具有高度特异性,并与严重反应强烈相关,而交叉反应性 Cor a 1,即桦树 Bet v1 的同源物,与 OAS 相关。任何截止值均表现出与替代口服食物挑战(OFC)一样高的特异性和敏感性模式,OFC 仍然是榛子过敏诊断的金标准。迄今为止,仍然没有明确的治疗方法。无榛子饮食和症状的紧急管理治疗,包括自动注射肾上腺素的处方,仍然是主要方法。口服过敏原免疫治疗(AIT)似乎是一种很有前途的治疗策略,定义个体临床阈值对于致敏个体、护理人员和医生来说非常有用,可以减少社交限制、焦虑,并更好地管理食物过敏。
包括临床病史、体内和体外试验(包括成分解析诊断和 OFC)的准确诊断工作对于确认诊断、评估严重反应的风险以及规定适当的饮食和治疗至关重要。