Moraly Tomas, Pelletier de Chambure Diane, Verdun Stephane, Preda Christian, Seynave Maxime, Vilain Anne Christine, Chenivesse Cecile, Delebarre-Sauvage Christine
Hôpital Saint-Vincent de Paul, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Service d'Allergologie, Lille, France; Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique de Lille, Université Catholique de Lille, Lille, France.
Hôpital Saint-Vincent de Paul, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Service d'Allergologie, Lille, France; CHU Lille, Service de Pneumologie et Immuno-Allergologie, Centre de compétence Maladies Pulmonaires Rares, Lille, France.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Feb;8(2):704-709.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.10.045. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
Oral immunotherapy (OIT) protects patients with IgE-mediated food allergies from food-induced allergic reactions due to accidental exposure and may improve their quality of life. This approach has never been evaluated for hazelnut, a major cause of food allergy in Europe.
To determine the proportion of hazelnut-desensitized patients after 6 months of OIT and to identify predictors of successful desensitization.
In a retrospective single-center study, we included patients younger than 18 years who underwent at least 6 months of hazelnut OIT for IgE-mediated allergy, defined by history of hypersensitivity reaction after hazelnut ingestion, positive hazelnut skin prick test result or specific IgE, and positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. Patients able to tolerate 1635 mg of hazelnut protein (∼8 hazelnuts) were considered to be hazelnut desensitized. We determined the proportion of desensitized patients after 6 months of OIT, searched for associations between baseline variables and successful desensitization, and estimated the frequency and severity of OIT-related adverse reactions.
One hundred patients were included (64% males; median age, 5 years). History of severe reactions was noted in 7% of cases. At 6 months, the proportion of desensitized patients was 34% (95% CI, 25-44). The median eliciting dose (defined as the amount of hazelnut protein provoking a hypersensitivity reaction during the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge) increased from 106 mg (interquartile range, 51-249) at baseline to 523 mg (interquartile range, 190-1635) after 6 months of OIT (P < .0001). With longer therapy, the proportion of desensitized patients increased. Using multivariate analysis, successful desensitization was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2), smaller hazelnut skin prick test wheal diameter (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.4-0.8), lower hazelnut specific IgE level (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98), and absence of cashew allergy (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.12-0.64). Adverse reactions occurred in 30% of patients; none were severe.
In a cohort of 100 patients aged 3 to 9 years, our results show for the first time that hazelnut OIT is associated with hazelnut desensitization and may be safe in most patients undergoing this therapy.
口服免疫疗法(OIT)可保护IgE介导的食物过敏患者免受因意外接触食物引起的过敏反应,并可能改善他们的生活质量。欧洲食物过敏的主要原因之一是榛子,而这种方法从未针对榛子进行过评估。
确定口服免疫疗法6个月后榛子脱敏患者的比例,并确定成功脱敏的预测因素。
在一项回顾性单中心研究中,我们纳入了年龄小于18岁、因IgE介导的过敏接受至少6个月榛子口服免疫疗法的患者,这些患者由榛子摄入后过敏反应病史、榛子皮肤点刺试验结果或特异性IgE阳性,以及双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验阳性定义。能够耐受1635毫克榛子蛋白(约8颗榛子)的患者被认为榛子脱敏。我们确定了口服免疫疗法6个月后脱敏患者的比例,寻找基线变量与成功脱敏之间的关联,并估计口服免疫疗法相关不良反应的频率和严重程度。
纳入100例患者(64%为男性;中位年龄5岁)。7%的病例有严重反应病史。6个月时,脱敏患者的比例为34%(95%CI,25 - 44)。中位激发剂量(定义为双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验期间引发过敏反应的榛子蛋白量)从基线时的106毫克(四分位间距,51 - 249)增加到口服免疫疗法6个月后的523毫克(四分位间距,190 - 1635)(P <.0001)。随着治疗时间延长,脱敏患者的比例增加。使用多变量分析,成功脱敏与年龄较大(比值比[OR],1.5;95%CI,1.2 - 2.2)、榛子皮肤点刺试验风团直径较小(OR,0.61;95%CI,0.4 - 0.8)、榛子特异性IgE水平较低(OR,0.86;95%CI,0.72 - 0.98)以及无腰果过敏(OR,0.42;95%CI,0.12 - 0.64)相关。30%的患者出现不良反应;均不严重。
在一组100例3至9岁的患者中,我们的结果首次表明榛子口服免疫疗法与榛子脱敏相关,并且对大多数接受该疗法的患者可能是安全 的。