• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短时长和长时长CrossFit训练课中乳酸、心率及主观用力感觉的反应

Lactate, Heart Rate and Rating of Perceived Exertion Responses to Shorter and Longer Duration CrossFit Training Sessions.

作者信息

Tibana Ramires Alsamir, De Sousa Nuno Manuel Frade, Prestes Jonato, Voltarelli Fabrício Azevedo

机构信息

Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso, 78000 Cuiabá (MT), Brazil.

Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, Faculty Estacio of Vitoria, 29010 Vitoria (ES), Brazil.

出版信息

J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2018 Nov 28;3(4):60. doi: 10.3390/jfmk3040060.

DOI:10.3390/jfmk3040060
PMID:33466988
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7739245/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze blood lactate concentration (LAC), heart rate (HR), and rating perceived exertion (RPE) during and after shorter and longer duration CrossFit sessions. Nine men (27.7 ± 3.2 years; 11.3 ± 4.6% body fat percentage and training experience: 41.1 ± 19.6 months) randomly performed two CrossFit sessions (shorter: ~4 min and longer: 17 min) with a 7-day interval between them. The response of LAC and HR were measured pre, during, immediately after, and 10, 20, and 30 min after the sessions. RPE was measured pre and immediately after sessions. Lactate levels were higher during the recovery of the shorter session as compared with the longer session (shorter: 15.9 ± 2.2 mmol/L/min, longer: 12.6 ± 2.6 mmol/L/min; = 0.019). There were no significant differences between protocols on HR during (shorter: 176 ± 6 bpm or 91 ± 4% HRmax, longer: 174 ± 3 bpm or 90 ± 3% HRmax, = 0.387). The LAC was significantly higher throughout the recovery period for both training sessions as compared to pre-exercise. The RPE was increased immediately after both sessions as compared to pre-exercise, while there was no significant difference between them (shorter: 8.7 ± 0.9, longer: 9.6 ± 0.5; = 0.360). These results demonstrated that both shorter and longer sessions induced elevated cardiovascular responses which met the recommendations for gains in cardiovascular fitness. In addition, both training sessions had a high metabolic and perceptual response, which may not be suitable if performed on consecutive days.

摘要

本研究的目的是分析在时长较短和较长的CrossFit训练期间及之后的血乳酸浓度(LAC)、心率(HR)和自觉用力程度(RPE)。九名男性(年龄27.7±3.2岁;体脂率11.3±4.6%;训练经验:41.1±19.6个月)随机进行两次CrossFit训练(较短时长:约4分钟;较长时长:17分钟),两次训练间隔7天。在训练前、训练期间、训练结束后即刻以及训练结束后10、20和30分钟测量LAC和HR的反应。在训练前和训练结束后即刻测量RPE。与较长时长训练相比,较短时长训练恢复期间的乳酸水平更高(较短时长:15.9±2.2毫摩尔/升/分钟,较长时长:12.6±2.6毫摩尔/升/分钟;P = 0.019)。训练期间,两种训练方案的HR无显著差异(较短时长:176±6次/分钟或91±4%最大心率,较长时长:174±3次/分钟或90±3%最大心率,P = 0.387)。与运动前相比,两次训练的整个恢复期间LAC均显著升高。与运动前相比,两次训练结束后即刻RPE均升高,而两者之间无显著差异(较短时长:8.7±0.9,较长时长:9.6±0.5;P = 0.360)。这些结果表明,较短和较长时长的训练均会引起心血管反应升高,达到了心血管适能提升的建议水平。此外,两次训练均具有较高的代谢和感知反应,如果连续进行可能不合适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4a4/7739245/64ce14634f44/jfmk-03-00060-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4a4/7739245/3848e29ae518/jfmk-03-00060-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4a4/7739245/275489e9108b/jfmk-03-00060-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4a4/7739245/82f1cf171a61/jfmk-03-00060-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4a4/7739245/21fca363af36/jfmk-03-00060-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4a4/7739245/64ce14634f44/jfmk-03-00060-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4a4/7739245/3848e29ae518/jfmk-03-00060-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4a4/7739245/275489e9108b/jfmk-03-00060-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4a4/7739245/82f1cf171a61/jfmk-03-00060-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4a4/7739245/21fca363af36/jfmk-03-00060-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4a4/7739245/64ce14634f44/jfmk-03-00060-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Lactate, Heart Rate and Rating of Perceived Exertion Responses to Shorter and Longer Duration CrossFit Training Sessions.短时长和长时长CrossFit训练课中乳酸、心率及主观用力感觉的反应
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2018 Nov 28;3(4):60. doi: 10.3390/jfmk3040060.
2
Is Perceived Exertion a Useful Indicator of the Metabolic and Cardiovascular Responses to a Metabolic Conditioning Session of Functional Fitness?自觉用力程度是否是功能性健身代谢训练课中代谢和心血管反应的有用指标?
Sports (Basel). 2019 Jul 4;7(7):161. doi: 10.3390/sports7070161.
3
Comparison of acute physiological responses between one long and two short sessions of moderate-intensity training in endurance athletes.耐力运动员进行一次长时间与两次短时间中等强度训练的急性生理反应比较。
Front Physiol. 2024 Jul 30;15:1428536. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1428536. eCollection 2024.
4
Extreme Conditioning Program Induced Acute Hypotensive Effects are Independent of the Exercise Session Intensity.极端体能训练计划引起的急性降压作用与训练课强度无关。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2017 Dec 1;10(8):1165-1173. doi: 10.70252/CDFU3385. eCollection 2017.
5
Two Consecutive Days of Crossfit Training Affects Pro and Anti-inflammatory Cytokines and Osteoprotegerin without Impairments in Muscle Power.连续两天的Crossfit训练会影响促炎和抗炎细胞因子以及骨保护素,而不会损害肌肉力量。
Front Physiol. 2016 Jun 28;7:260. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00260. eCollection 2016.
6
Physiological and Perceived Exertion Responses during International Karate Kumite Competition.国际空手道组手比赛期间的生理与主观用力反应
Asian J Sports Med. 2013 Dec;4(4):263-71. doi: 10.5812/asjsm.34246. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
7
How Does Interval-Training Prescription Affect Physiological and Perceptual Responses?间歇训练处方如何影响生理和感知反应?
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Apr;12(Suppl 2):S280-S286. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0464. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
8
Cardiometabolic and Muscular Fatigue Responses to Different CrossFit® Workouts.不同 CrossFit®训练对心肺代谢和肌肉疲劳的反应。
J Sports Sci Med. 2018 Nov 20;17(4):668-679. eCollection 2018 Dec.
9
Rating of perceived exertion as a tool for prescribing and self regulating interval training: a pilot study.自觉用力程度评级作为制定和自我调节间歇训练的工具:一项初步研究。
Biol Sport. 2015 Jun;32(2):103-8. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1134312. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
10
Time-course effects of functional fitness sessions performed at different intensities on the metabolic, hormonal, and BDNF responses in trained men.不同强度的功能性健身训练对训练有素男性的代谢、激素和脑源性神经营养因子反应的时间进程效应。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Feb 8;14(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00412-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-related differences in the acute physiological response to a high-intensity CrossFit® workout.高强度CrossFit®训练急性生理反应中的性别差异。
Curr Res Physiol. 2025 May 20;8:100148. doi: 10.1016/j.crphys.2025.100148. eCollection 2025.
2
Nutrition in CrossFit® - scientific evidence and practical perspectives: a systematic scoping review.CrossFit®中的营养——科学证据与实践观点:一项系统的范围综述
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2025 Dec;22(1):2509674. doi: 10.1080/15502783.2025.2509674. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
3
Acute effect of three functional fitness training designs with equalized load on inexperienced and experienced athletes.

本文引用的文献

1
Are extreme conditioning programmes effective and safe? A narrative review of high-intensity functional training methods research paradigms and findings.极限训练计划是否有效且安全?高强度功能性训练方法的研究范式与结果的叙述性综述。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Nov 2;4(1):e000435. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000435. eCollection 2018.
2
Physiological and Fitness Adaptations after Eight Weeks of High-Intensity Functional Training in Physically Inactive Adults.缺乏运动的成年人进行八周高强度功能性训练后的生理与体能适应情况
Sports (Basel). 2018 Nov 13;6(4):146. doi: 10.3390/sports6040146.
3
High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT): Definition and Research Implications for Improved Fitness.
三种负荷均衡的功能性体能训练设计对新手和有经验运动员的急性影响。
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 30;13:e19265. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19265. eCollection 2025.
4
The physiological responses to volume-matched high-intensity functional training protocols with varied time domains.对具有不同时域的容量匹配高强度功能训练方案的生理反应。
Front Physiol. 2025 Feb 11;15:1511961. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1511961. eCollection 2024.
5
The Effects of CrossFit Practice on Physical Fitness and Overall Quality of Life.CrossFit训练对身体素质和整体生活质量的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 28;22(1):19. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010019.
6
Six weeks of polarized functional interval training with large training load reductions does not affect performance gains compared to traditional workouts.与传统训练相比,六周的极化功能间歇训练且训练负荷大幅降低并不会影响运动成绩的提高。
Front Physiol. 2024 Nov 15;15:1446837. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1446837. eCollection 2024.
7
The physical demands and physiological responses to CrossFit®: a scoping review with evidence gap map and meta-correlation.对CrossFit®的身体需求和生理反应:一项基于证据差距图和元相关性的范围综述
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Sep 20;16(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00986-3.
8
Muscular performance analysis in "cross" modalities: comparison between "AMRAP," "EMOM" and "RFT" configurations.“交叉”模式下的肌肉性能分析:“尽可能多重复次数(AMRAP)”、“每分钟进行一定次数(EMOM)”和“快速完成规定次数(RFT)”配置之间的比较。
Front Physiol. 2024 Mar 5;15:1358191. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1358191. eCollection 2024.
9
Assessment of Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Contributions in an Extreme Intensity CrossFit Benchmark Workout.评估极端强度 CrossFit 基准训练中的心肺代谢贡献。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 14;24(2):513. doi: 10.3390/s24020513.
10
Recreational 3 × 3 basketball elicits higher heart rate, enjoyment, and physical activity intensities but lower blood lactate and perceived exertion compared to HIIT in active young adults.与高强度间歇训练(HIIT)相比,娱乐性3对3篮球运动能使活跃的年轻人产生更高的心率、愉悦感和身体活动强度,但血乳酸水平和主观用力感觉更低。
Biol Sport. 2023 Jul;40(3):889-898. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.122478. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
高强度功能性训练(HIFT):改善体能的定义及研究意义
Sports (Basel). 2018 Aug 7;6(3):76. doi: 10.3390/sports6030076.
4
Validity of Session Rating Perceived Exertion Method for Quantifying Internal Training Load during High-Intensity Functional Training.高强度功能性训练期间用于量化内部训练负荷的会话感知用力评分法的有效性
Sports (Basel). 2018 Jul 23;6(3):68. doi: 10.3390/sports6030068.
5
Exertional Rhabdomyolysis after an Extreme Conditioning Competition: A Case Report.一场极限体能竞赛后的运动性横纹肌溶解症:病例报告
Sports (Basel). 2018 Apr 26;6(2):40. doi: 10.3390/sports6020040.
6
Extreme Conditioning Program Induced Acute Hypotensive Effects are Independent of the Exercise Session Intensity.极端体能训练计划引起的急性降压作用与训练课强度无关。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2017 Dec 1;10(8):1165-1173. doi: 10.70252/CDFU3385. eCollection 2017.
7
Autonomic response to a short and long bout of high-intensity functional training.自主神经对短时间和长时间高强度功能训练的反应。
J Sports Sci. 2018 Aug;36(16):1872-1879. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1423857. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
8
Functional high-intensity training improves pancreatic β-cell function in adults with type 2 diabetes.功能性高强度训练可改善2型糖尿病成人患者的胰腺β细胞功能。
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Sep 1;313(3):E314-E320. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00407.2016. Epub 2017 May 16.
9
Attentive processes, blood lactate and CrossFit.注意力过程、血乳酸与CrossFit训练
Phys Sportsmed. 2016 Nov;44(4):403-406. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2016.1222852. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
10
Two Consecutive Days of Crossfit Training Affects Pro and Anti-inflammatory Cytokines and Osteoprotegerin without Impairments in Muscle Power.连续两天的Crossfit训练会影响促炎和抗炎细胞因子以及骨保护素,而不会损害肌肉力量。
Front Physiol. 2016 Jun 28;7:260. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00260. eCollection 2016.