Suppr超能文献

三种负荷均衡的功能性体能训练设计对新手和有经验运动员的急性影响。

Acute effect of three functional fitness training designs with equalized load on inexperienced and experienced athletes.

作者信息

Oliver-López Alejandro, García-Valverde Adrián, Sabido Rafael

机构信息

Sport Research Center, University Miguel Hernández, Elche, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain.

Department of Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2025 Apr 30;13:e19265. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19265. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the realm of functional fitness training (FFT), three common circuits-as many repetitions or round as possible (AMRAP), for time (FT), and every minute on a minute (EMOM)-are prevalent. We aimed to elucidate the immediate impacts on athletes, considering the experience, when performing three workout modalities with matched training loads.

METHODS

Twenty-five healthy men and women, with at least three months of experience in FFT, were allocated into the Inexperienced group (IG) and Experienced group (EG). The cut point for allocating participant in each group was set at 24 months. All of them participated in three workouts (AMRAP, FT and EMOM) with three days of rest. A double comparison was performed between level of experience (IG and EG) and among kinds of training in rating of perceived exertion (RPE), lactate concentration (LAC), countermovement jump (CMJ), heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) using ANOVA and Bonferroni tests.

RESULTS

Sex was initially analyzed but had no influence, leading to combined group analyses. The workout type significantly impacted performance, with AMRAP showing differences between expertise levels (ES = 0.81,  = .044). RPE varied by workout type ((2,46) = 11.003;  < .001), with EG reporting FT as the most and EMOM as the least demanding. Lactate levels increased across all workouts, with FT showing the highest and EMOM the lowest levels ( = 1.05,  < .001). CMJ performance declined post-AMRAP and FT in both groups, but not after EMOM. No expertise-level differences were found in HRmean or HRmax, but HRV changes were influenced by workout type ((2,46) = 7.381;  < .01) and expertise ((1,23) = 4.657;  = .034), with significant decreases in HRV after AMRAP and FT for IG.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that FT produced greater LAC and RPE as compared to an AMRAP, whereas EMOM generated less neuromuscular fatigue and Lac, particularly in EG. These results underscore the importance of individualizing workout selection to expertise level to optimize performance. Future research should explore longitudinal adaptation to different workout types across diverse populations.

摘要

背景

在功能性健身训练(FFT)领域,三种常见的训练方式很普遍,即尽可能多的重复次数或轮数(AMRAP)、限时训练(FT)和每分钟进行一次训练(EMOM)。我们旨在阐明在进行三种训练负荷匹配的训练方式时,对有经验的运动员的即时影响。

方法

25名在FFT方面至少有三个月经验的健康男性和女性被分为无经验组(IG)和有经验组(EG)。将参与者分配到每组的分界点设定为24个月。他们所有人都参加了三次训练(AMRAP、FT和EMOM),每次训练之间休息三天。使用方差分析和Bonferroni检验,在经验水平(IG和EG)之间以及不同训练方式之间,对主观用力程度(RPE)、乳酸浓度(LAC)、反向纵跳(CMJ)、心率(HR)和心率变异性(HRV)进行双因素比较。

结果

最初对性别进行了分析,但未发现其有影响,因此进行了合并组分析。训练方式对表现有显著影响,AMRAP在专业水平之间存在差异(ES = 0.81,P = 0.044)。RPE因训练方式而异(F(2,46) = 11.003;P < 0.001),EG报告FT要求最高,EMOM要求最低。所有训练中乳酸水平均升高,FT显示最高水平,EMOM显示最低水平(F = 1.05,P < 0.001)。两组在AMRAP和FT后CMJ表现均下降,但在EMOM后未下降。在HRmean或HRmax方面未发现专业水平差异,但HRV变化受训练方式(F(2,46) = 7.381;P < 0.01)和专业程度(F(1,23) = 4.657;P = 0.034)影响,IG在AMRAP和FT后HRV显著下降。

结论

该研究表明,与AMRAP相比,FT产生更高的LAC和RPE,而EMOM产生的神经肌肉疲劳和Lac较少,尤其是在EG中。这些结果强调了根据专业水平个性化选择训练方式以优化表现的重要性。未来的研究应探索不同人群对不同训练方式的纵向适应性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6685/12049098/3af941911c8b/peerj-13-19265-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验