Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada.
College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B2, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 15;18(2):699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020699.
Research on the importance of the family environment on children's health behaviors is ubiquitous, yet critical gaps in the literature exist. Many studies have focused on one family characteristic and have relied on variable-centered approaches as opposed to person-centered approaches (e.g., latent profile analysis). The purpose of the current study was to use latent profile analysis to identify family typologies characterized by parental acceptance, parental monitoring, and family conflict, and to examine whether such typologies are associated with the number of movement behavior recommendations (i.e., physical activity, screen time, and sleep) met by children. Data for this cross-sectional observational study were part of the baseline data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Data were collected across 21 study sites in the United States. Participants included 10,712 children (female = 5143, males = 5578) aged 9 and 10 years (M = 9.91, SD = 0.62). Results showed that children were meaningfully classified into one of five family typologies. Children from families with and (P2; OR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.76); , , and (P3; OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.20, 0.40); , , and (P4; OR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.16, 0.36); and , , and (P5; OR = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.12-0.29) were less likely to meet all three movement behavior recommendations compared to children from families with , , and (P1). These findings highlight the importance of the family environment for promoting healthy movement behaviors among children.
家庭环境对儿童健康行为的重要性研究比比皆是，但文献中存在着关键性的空白。许多研究都集中在一个家庭特征上，并且依赖于变量为中心的方法，而不是以人为中心的方法（例如，潜在剖面分析）。本研究的目的是使用潜在剖面分析来识别以父母接受度、父母监督和家庭冲突为特征的家庭类型，并探讨这些类型是否与儿童满足的运动行为建议数量（即体力活动、屏幕时间和睡眠）相关。本横断面观察性研究的数据是青少年大脑认知发展（ABCD）研究基线数据的一部分。数据来自美国 21 个研究地点收集。参与者包括 10712 名 9 至 10 岁的儿童（女性=5143 名，男性=5578 名）（M=9.91，SD=0.62）。结果表明，儿童可以有意义地分为五种家庭类型之一。来自父母接受度高、监督程度高、家庭冲突低的家庭的儿童（P2；OR=0.54；95%CI，0.39-0.76）；父母接受度高、监督程度高、家庭冲突高的儿童（P3；OR=0.28；95%CI，0.20-0.40）；父母接受度低、监督程度低、家庭冲突高的儿童（P4；OR=0.24；95%CI，0.16-0.36）；以及父母接受度低、监督程度高、家庭冲突低的儿童（P5；OR=0.19；95%CI，0.12-0.29）与来自父母接受度高、监督程度高、家庭冲突低的家庭的儿童相比，更不可能满足所有三项运动行为建议。这些发现强调了家庭环境对促进儿童健康运动行为的重要性。
