Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
Primary Care and Population Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
BMJ. 2021 Jan 19;372:m4858. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4858.
The HOME BP (Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure) trial aimed to test a digital intervention for hypertension management in primary care by combining self-monitoring of blood pressure with guided self-management.
Unmasked randomised controlled trial with automated ascertainment of primary endpoint.
76 general practices in the United Kingdom.
622 people with treated but poorly controlled hypertension (>140/90 mm Hg) and access to the internet.
Participants were randomised by using a minimisation algorithm to self-monitoring of blood pressure with a digital intervention (305 participants) or usual care (routine hypertension care, with appointments and drug changes made at the discretion of the general practitioner; 317 participants). The digital intervention provided feedback of blood pressure results to patients and professionals with optional lifestyle advice and motivational support. Target blood pressure for hypertension, diabetes, and people aged 80 or older followed UK national guidelines.
The primary outcome was the difference in systolic blood pressure (mean of second and third readings) after one year, adjusted for baseline blood pressure, blood pressure target, age, and practice, with multiple imputation for missing values.
After one year, data were available from 552 participants (88.6%) with imputation for the remaining 70 participants (11.4%). Mean blood pressure dropped from 151.7/86.4 to 138.4/80.2 mm Hg in the intervention group and from 151.6/85.3 to 141.8/79.8 mm Hg in the usual care group, giving a mean difference in systolic blood pressure of -3.4 mm Hg (95% confidence interval -6.1 to -0.8 mm Hg) and a mean difference in diastolic blood pressure of -0.5 mm Hg (-1.9 to 0.9 mm Hg). Results were comparable in the complete case analysis and adverse effects were similar between groups. Within trial costs showed an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of £11 ($15, €12; 95% confidence interval £6 to £29) per mm Hg reduction.
The HOME BP digital intervention for the management of hypertension by using self-monitored blood pressure led to better control of systolic blood pressure after one year than usual care, with low incremental costs. Implementation in primary care will require integration into clinical workflows and consideration of people who are digitally excluded.
ISRCTN13790648.
HOME BP(家庭和在线管理及血压评估)试验旨在通过自我监测血压与指导自我管理相结合,测试初级保健中高血压管理的数字干预措施。
未设盲随机对照试验,主要终点的自动确定。
英国 76 家普通诊所。
622 名接受治疗但血压控制不佳的高血压患者(>140/90 mmHg),并能上网。
参与者通过最小化算法随机分为自我监测血压的数字干预组(305 名参与者)或常规护理组(常规高血压护理,由全科医生自行决定预约和药物调整;317 名参与者)。数字干预为患者和专业人员提供血压结果反馈,可选择提供生活方式建议和激励性支持。高血压、糖尿病和 80 岁及以上人群的目标血压遵循英国国家指南。
主要结局是经过一年调整后的收缩压(第二次和第三次读数的平均值)差异,以基线血压、血压目标、年龄和实践为调整因素,对于缺失值采用多重插补法进行处理。
一年后,552 名参与者(88.6%)的数据可用,其余 70 名参与者(11.4%)的数据采用插补法处理。干预组的平均血压从 151.7/86.4 降至 138.4/80.2 mmHg,常规护理组从 151.6/85.3 降至 141.8/79.8 mmHg,收缩压的平均差值为-3.4 mmHg(95%置信区间-6.1 至-0.8 mmHg),舒张压的平均差值为-0.5 mmHg(-1.9 至 0.9 mmHg)。完全病例分析结果相当,两组间不良反应相似。试验内成本显示,每降低 1 mmHg 的增量成本效果比为 11 英镑(15 美元,12 欧元;95%置信区间 6 至 29 英镑)。
使用自我监测血压的 HOME BP 数字干预措施治疗高血压,一年后收缩压控制优于常规护理,且增量成本较低。在初级保健中实施需要将其整合到临床工作流程中,并考虑那些被数字技术排斥在外的人群。
ISRCTN81146236。