Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana.
UMass Memorial Health Care, Boston, Massachusetts.
Neurosurgery. 2021 Apr 15;88(5):989-995. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa561.
Historically, symptomatic, benign intradural extramedullary (IDEM) spine tumors have been managed with surgical resection. However, minimal robust data regarding patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following treatment of symptomatic lesions exists. Moreover, there are increasing reports of radiosurgical management of these lesions without robust health-related quality of life data.
To prospectively analyze PROs among patients with benign IDEM spine tumors undergoing surgical resection to define the symptomatic efficacy of surgery.
Prospective, single-center observational cohort study of patients with benign IDEM spine tumors undergoing open surgical resection. Pre- and postoperative Brief Pain Index (BPI) and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) questionnaires were used to quantitatively assess their symptom control after surgical intervention. Matched pairs were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
A total of 57 patients met inclusion criteria with both pre- and postoperative PROs. There were 35 schwannomas, 18 meningiomas, 2 neurofibromas, 1 paraganglioma, and 1 mixed schwannoma/neurofibroma. Most patients were American Spinal Injury Association Impairment (ASIA) E (93%) with high-grade spinal cord compression (77%), and underwent either a 2 or 3 level laminectomy (84%). Surgical resection resulted in statistically significant improvement in all 3 composite BPI constructs of pain-severity, pain-interference, and overall patient pain experience (P < .0001). Surgical resection resulted in statistically significant improvements in all composite scores for the MDASI core symptom severity, spine tumor, and disease interference constructs (P < .01). Three patients (5%) had postoperative complications requiring surgical interventions (2 wound revisions and 1 ventriculo-peritoneal shunt).
Surgical resection of IDEM spine tumors provides rapid, significant, and durable improvement in PROs.
历史上,有症状的良性硬脊膜外髓内(IDEM)脊柱肿瘤采用手术切除治疗。然而,关于此类症状性病变治疗后患者报告的结果(PROs)的数据并不多。此外,越来越多的报告显示,对这些病变采用放射外科治疗,而缺乏可靠的健康相关生活质量数据。
前瞻性分析接受手术切除治疗的良性 IDEM 脊柱肿瘤患者的 PROs,以确定手术治疗的症状缓解效果。
对接受开放性手术切除的良性 IDEM 脊柱肿瘤患者进行前瞻性、单中心观察队列研究。使用简短疼痛指数(BPI)和 MD 安德森症状评估量表(MDASI)问卷对患者手术干预前后的症状控制情况进行定量评估。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验对配对数据进行分析。
共有 57 例患者符合纳入标准,且均具有手术前后的 PROs。其中 35 例为神经鞘瘤,18 例为脑膜瘤,2 例为神经纤维瘤,1 例为副神经节瘤,1 例为神经鞘瘤/神经纤维瘤混合瘤。大多数患者的美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤分级为 E 级(93%),且存在高分级脊髓压迫(77%),行 2 或 3 个节段的椎板切除术(84%)。手术切除后,所有 3 项 BPI 复合结构(疼痛严重程度、疼痛干扰度和患者整体疼痛体验)的疼痛严重程度均有统计学显著改善(P<.0001)。手术切除后,MDASI 核心症状严重程度、脊柱肿瘤和疾病干扰等复合评分均有统计学显著改善(P<.01)。3 例患者(5%)术后发生并发症,需要手术干预(2 例伤口修复,1 例脑室-腹腔分流术)。
IDE M 脊柱肿瘤的手术切除可迅速、显著、持久地改善 PROs。