Suppr超能文献

智能手机声级计应用程序(SLMAs)在临床环境中测量声级的准确性。

The Accuracy of Smartphone Sound Level Meter Applications (SLMAs) in Measuring Sound Levels in Clinical Rooms.

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York.

Long Island Doctor of Audiology (AuD) Consortium, Garden City, New York.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2021 Jan;32(1):27-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1719137. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of smartphone sound level meter applications (SLMAs) has been investigated with varied results, based on differences in platform, device, app, available features, test stimuli, and methodology.

PURPOSE

This article determines the accuracy of smartphone SLMAs with and without calibration of external and internal microphones for measuring sound levels in clinical rooms.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Quasi-experimental research design comparing the accuracy of two smartphone SLMAs with and without calibration of external and internal microphones.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two iOS-based smartphone SLMAs (NIOSH SLM and SPL Meter) on an iPhone 6S were used with and without calibrated external and internal microphones. Measures included: (1) white noise (WN) stimuli from 20 to 100 dB sound pressure level in a sound-treated test booth and (2) sound levels in quiet in four nonsound-treated clinical rooms and in simulated background sound conditions using music at 45, 55, and 80 dBA. Chi-square analysis was used to determine a significant difference ( ≤ 0.05) in sound measures between the SLMAs and a Type 1 SLM.

RESULTS

Measures of WN signals and room sound level measures in quiet and simulated background sound conditions were significantly more accurate at levels ≥ 40 dBA using the SLMAs with calibrated external and internal microphones. However, SLMA measures with and without calibration of external and internal microphones overestimated sound levels < 40 dBA.

CONCLUSION

The SLMAs studied with calibrated external or internal microphones are able to verify the room environment for audiologic screening at 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz at 20 dB hearing level (American Academy of Audiology and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association) using supra-aural earphones (American National Standards Institute S3.1-1999 [R2018]). However, the tested SLMAs overestimated low-level sound < 40 dBA, even when the external or internal microphones were calibrated. Clinicians are advised to calibrate the microphones prior to using measurement systems involving smartphones and SLMAs to measure room sound levels and to monitor background noise levels throughout the provision of clinical services.

摘要

背景

基于平台、设备、应用程序、可用功能、测试刺激物和方法的差异,智能手机声级计应用程序(SLMAs)的准确性已经过不同的研究结果进行了调查。

目的

本文旨在确定在临床房间内测量声级时,未经校准和经外部和内部麦克风校准的智能手机 SLMA 的准确性。

研究设计

使用 iPhone 6S 上的两个基于 iOS 的智能手机 SLMAs(NIOSH SLM 和 SPL Meter)进行准实验研究设计,比较未经校准和经外部和内部麦克风校准的智能手机 SLMAs 的准确性。

数据收集和分析

使用未经校准和经外部和内部麦克风校准的两种智能手机 SLMAs(NIOSH SLM 和 SPL Meter)在一个隔音测试室中测量了从 20 到 100dB 声压级的白噪声(WN)刺激,以及在四个未处理的临床房间和模拟背景声音条件下的安静声音水平使用 45、55 和 80dBA 的音乐。使用卡方分析确定 SLMAs 与 Type 1 SLM 之间声音测量的显著差异(≤0.05)。

结果

在使用经外部和内部麦克风校准的 SLMAs 时,WN 信号和安静及模拟背景声音条件下的房间声音水平测量在≥40dBA 时更准确。然而,未经校准和经外部和内部麦克风校准的 SLMA 测量值在 40dB 以下时会高估声音水平。

结论

研究中的 SLMAs 经外部或内部麦克风校准后,可在使用 20dB 听力级(美国听力学协会和美国言语-语言-听力协会)的颅带式耳机(美国国家标准协会 S3.1-1999 [R2018])进行 1000、2000 和 4000Hz 的听力筛查时验证房间环境。然而,即使外部或内部麦克风经过校准,测试的 SLMAs 仍会高估低于 40dB 的低水平声音。临床医生在使用涉及智能手机和 SLMAs 的测量系统来测量房间声音水平并监测整个临床服务过程中的背景噪声水平时,建议先校准麦克风。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验