• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重症烧伤患者的多模式镇痛效果。

Impact of Multimodal Analgesia in Critically Ill Burn Patients.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Services, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, USA.

Firefighters Burn Institute, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2021 Sep 30;42(5):986-990. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab001.

DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irab001
PMID:33471091
Abstract

Opioids are the mainstay of treatment for burn pain. However, these medications may be associated with respiratory depression and dependence. Multimodal analgesia is an alternative method that utilizes both opioid and nonopioid medications with different mechanisms. This study examines the impact of multimodal therapy for postoperative pain control in a burn intensive care unit.  This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the burn unit at a tertiary medical center. Consecutively admitted patients with burns greater than or equal to 10% TBSA and intensive care unit length of stay greater than 7 days were eligible for inclusion (2012-2018). Patients were excluded if they received an opioid infusion greater than 48 hours.  Patients treated with multimodal analgesia were compared to those treated with opioids alone. Data were calculated for 5 days after surgery. There were 98 patients in the nonmultimodal group and 97 in the multimodal group. Mean cumulative opioid dose was lower in the multimodal group (1028.7 mg vs 1423.2 mg, P = .0031). Patients with greater than 20% burns had a larger reduction in mean opioid equivalents in the multimodal group (1106 vs 1594 mg, P = .009) compared to patients with burns less than 20% (940 vs 1282 mg, P = .058). There was no difference in mean pain scores on postoperative day 5 (6.2 ± 2.2 vs 5.5 ± 2.3, P = .07) or at intensive care unit discharge (4.7 ± 2.4 vs 4.7 ± 2.8, P = .99). The use of multimodal analgesia significantly reduced cumulative opioid equivalent dose without compromising pain control.    .

摘要

阿片类药物是治疗烧伤疼痛的主要药物。然而,这些药物可能与呼吸抑制和依赖有关。多模式镇痛是一种替代方法,它利用具有不同作用机制的阿片类药物和非阿片类药物。本研究探讨了烧伤重症监护病房多模式治疗对术后疼痛控制的影响。这是一项对一家三级医疗中心烧伤病房住院患者的回顾性队列研究。连续收治烧伤面积大于或等于 10%TBSA 和重症监护病房住院时间大于 7 天的患者符合纳入标准(2012-2018 年)。如果患者接受阿片类药物输注超过 48 小时,则将其排除在外。将接受多模式镇痛治疗的患者与单独接受阿片类药物治疗的患者进行比较。数据计算术后 5 天。非多模式组 98 例,多模式组 97 例。多模式组累积阿片类药物剂量较低(1028.7mg 比 1423.2mg,P =.0031)。烧伤面积大于 20%的患者多模式组平均阿片类等效药物剂量降低幅度更大(1106mg 比 1594mg,P =.009),烧伤面积小于 20%的患者(940mg 比 1282mg,P =.058)。术后第 5 天(6.2±2.2 比 5.5±2.3,P =.07)和重症监护病房出院时(4.7±2.4 比 4.7±2.8,P =.99)平均疼痛评分无差异。使用多模式镇痛显著降低累积阿片类等效药物剂量,而不影响疼痛控制。

相似文献

1
Impact of Multimodal Analgesia in Critically Ill Burn Patients.危重症烧伤患者的多模式镇痛效果。
J Burn Care Res. 2021 Sep 30;42(5):986-990. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab001.
2
Multimodal Analgesia and Opioid Use in Critically Ill Trauma Patients.重症创伤患者的多模式镇痛和阿片类药物使用。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 May;228(5):769-775.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
3
Multimodal Analgesia and Discharge Opioid Requirements in Burn Patients.烧伤患者的多模式镇痛和出院阿片类药物需求。
J Burn Care Res. 2020 Sep 23;41(5):963-966. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa088.
4
A Multi-institutional Assessment of Multimodal Analgesia in Penile Implant Recipients Demonstrates Dramatic Reduction in Pain Scores and Narcotic Usage.多模式镇痛在阴茎植入患者中的多机构评估显示疼痛评分和麻醉药物使用量显著降低。
J Sex Med. 2020 Mar;17(3):518-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.11.267. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
5
Preoperative multimodal analgesia decreases 24-hour postoperative narcotic consumption in elective spinal fusion patients.择期脊柱融合手术患者术前多模式镇痛可减少术后 24 小时阿片类药物用量。
Spine J. 2019 Nov;19(11):1753-1763. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
6
A retrospective comparison of thoracic epidural infusion and multimodal analgesia protocol for pain management following the minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum.鸡胸微创修复术后疼痛管理中胸段硬膜外输注与多模式镇痛方案的回顾性比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Dec;27(12):1227-1234. doi: 10.1111/pan.13264. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
7
Novel Multi-Modal Analgesia Protocol Significantly Decreases Opioid Requirements in Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Patients.新型多模式镇痛方案显著降低了可充气阴茎假体患者的阿片类药物需求。
J Sex Med. 2018 Aug;15(8):1187-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
8
Opioid prescribing practices in a pediatric burn tertiary care facility: Is it time to change?儿科烧伤三级护理机构的阿片类药物处方实践:是否是时候改变了?
Burns. 2020 Feb;46(1):219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
Multimodal Analgesia Protocol after Head and Neck Surgery: Effect on Opioid Use and Pain Control.头颈部手术后的多模式镇痛方案:对阿片类药物使用和疼痛控制的影响。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Sep;161(3):424-430. doi: 10.1177/0194599819841885. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
10
Multimodal Pain Management and Postoperative Outcomes in Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery: A Population-based Cohort Study.多模式疼痛管理与腰椎融合术后的临床结局:基于人群的队列研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 1;45(9):580-589. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003320.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of a multimodal analgesia strategy on remifentanil daily consumption in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: study protocol for a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial.多模式镇痛策略对机械通气成年重症监护病房患者瑞芬太尼每日用量的影响:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、平行组临床试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e090396. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090396.
2
Impact of a Multimodal Analgesia Protocol in an Intensive Care Unit: A Pre-post Cohort Study.多模式镇痛方案在重症监护病房的影响:一项前后队列研究。
Cureus. 2022 Mar 3;14(3):e22786. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22786. eCollection 2022 Mar.