Protti Ícaro F, Rodrigues Daniel R, Fonseca Sofia K, Alves Ricardo J, de Oliveira Renata B, Maltarollo Vinícius G
Departamento de Produtos Farmacêuticos, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627 Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, BR 31270-901, Brazil.
ChemMedChem. 2021 May 6;16(9):1446-1456. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.202000805. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
This paper describes a comparative analysis of the physicochemical and structural properties of prodrugs and their corresponding drugs with regard to drug-likeness rules. The dataset used in this work was obtained from the DrugBank. Sixty-five pairs of prodrugs/drugs were retrieved and divided into the following categories: carrier-linked to increase hydrophilic character, carrier-linked to increase absorption, and bioprecursors. We compared the physicochemical properties related to drug-likeness between prodrugs and drugs. Our results show that prodrugs do not always follow Lipinski's Rule of 5, especially as we observed 15 prodrugs with more than 10 hydrogen bond acceptors and 18 with a molecular weight greater than 500 Da. This fact highlights the importance of extending Lipinski's rules to encompass other parameters as both strategies (filtering of drug-like chemical libraries and prodrug design) aim to improve the bioavailability of compounds. Therefore, critical reasoning is fundamental to determine whether a structure has drug-like properties or could be considered a potential orally active compound in the drug-design pipeline.
本文描述了前药及其相应药物在类药规则方面的物理化学和结构性质的比较分析。本研究中使用的数据集来自DrugBank。检索到65对前药/药物,并将其分为以下几类:与载体相连以增加亲水性、与载体相连以增加吸收以及生物前体。我们比较了前药和药物之间与类药相关的物理化学性质。我们的结果表明,前药并不总是遵循Lipinski的五规则,特别是我们观察到15种前药具有超过10个氢键受体,18种前药的分子量大于500 Da。这一事实凸显了扩展Lipinski规则以涵盖其他参数的重要性,因为这两种策略(类药化学库的筛选和前药设计)旨在提高化合物的生物利用度。因此,批判性推理对于确定一种结构是否具有类药性质或在药物设计流程中是否可被视为潜在的口服活性化合物至关重要。