• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过疼痛和残疾驱动因素管理模型优化腰痛管理:一项可行性试验。

Optimizing management of low back pain through the pain and disability drivers management model: A feasibility trial.

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation, University of Shebrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.

Faculty of Medecine, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 20;16(1):e0245689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245689. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0245689
PMID:33471827
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7817044/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Self-reported levels of disability in individuals with low back pain (LBP) have not improved in the last decade. A broader perspective and a more comprehensive management framework may improve disability outcomes. We recently developed and validated the Low Back Pain and Disability Drivers Management (PDDM) model, which aims to identify the domains driving pain and disability to guide clinical decisions. The objectives of this study were to determine the applicability of the PDDM model to a LBP population and the feasibility of conducting a pragmatic trial, as well as to explore clinicians' perceived acceptability of the PDDM model's use in clinical settings.

METHODS

This study was an one-arm prospective feasibility trial. Participants included physiotherapists working with a population suffering from LBP and their patients aged 18 years or older presenting with a primary complaint of LBP that sought a new referral and deemed fit for rehabilitation from private and public clinical settings. Clinicians participated in a one-day workshop on the integration of the PDDM model into their clinical practice, and were asked to report various LBP-related outcomes via self-reported questionnaires (i.e., impact of pain on physical function, nervous system dysfunctions, cognitive-emotional factors, work disabilities) at baseline and at six-week follow-up. Physiotherapists' acceptability of the use of the PDDM model and appreciation of the training were assessed via semi-structured phone interviews. Analyses focused on a description of the model's applicability to a LBP population, feasibility outcomes and acceptability measures.

RESULTS

Applicablity of the PDDM model was confirmed since it successfully established the profile of patients according to the elements of each categories, and each of the 5 domains of the model was represented among the study sample. Trial was deemed feasible contingent upon few modifications as our predefined success criteria for the feasibility outcomes were met but feasibility issues pertaining to data collection were highlighted. Twenty-four (24) clinicians and 61 patients were recruited within the study's timeframe. Patient's attrition rate (29%) and clinicians' compliance to the study protocol were adequate. Clinicians' perceived acceptability of the use of the model in clinical settings and their appreciation of the training and online resources were both positive. Recommendations to improve the model's integration in clinical practice, content of the workshop and feasibility of data collection methods were identified for future studies. A positive effect for all patients' reported outcome measures were also observed. All outcome measures except for the PainDetect questionnaire showed a statistically significant reduction post-intervention (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

These findings provide preliminary evidence of the potential of the PDDM model to optimize LBP management as well as conducting a future larger-scale pragmatic trial to determine its effectiveness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT03949179.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93c7/7817044/c0cef81868e4/pone.0245689.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93c7/7817044/2115f4fc068a/pone.0245689.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93c7/7817044/c0cef81868e4/pone.0245689.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93c7/7817044/2115f4fc068a/pone.0245689.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93c7/7817044/c0cef81868e4/pone.0245689.g002.jpg
摘要

简介

在过去的十年中,患有下腰痛(LBP)的个体的自我报告残疾水平并没有改善。更广阔的视角和更全面的管理框架可能会改善残疾的结果。我们最近开发并验证了下腰痛和残疾驱动因素管理(PDDM)模型,旨在确定导致疼痛和残疾的领域,以指导临床决策。本研究的目的是确定 PDDM 模型是否适用于 LBP 人群,以及进行实用试验的可行性,并探讨临床医生对 PDDM 模型在临床环境中使用的可接受性。

方法

这是一项单臂前瞻性可行性试验。参与者包括在私人和公共临床环境中与患有 LBP 的人群一起工作的物理治疗师及其年龄在 18 岁或以上的患有原发性 LBP 抱怨的患者,他们寻求新的转诊并适合康复。临床医生参加了为期一天的研讨会,内容是将 PDDM 模型整合到他们的临床实践中,并要求他们通过自我报告的问卷报告各种与 LBP 相关的结果(即疼痛对身体功能的影响、神经系统功能障碍、认知情感因素、工作障碍)在基线和 6 周随访时。通过半结构化电话访谈评估物理治疗师对使用 PDDM 模型的可接受性以及对培训的欣赏程度。分析重点是模型在 LBP 人群中的适用性、可行性结果和可接受性措施。

结果

PDDM 模型的适用性得到了确认,因为它成功地根据每个类别的元素建立了患者的个人资料,并且研究样本中代表了模型的 5 个领域中的每一个。试验被认为是可行的,因为我们的可行性结果的预定成功标准得到了满足,但强调了与数据收集相关的可行性问题。在研究时间范围内,共招募了 24 名临床医生和 61 名患者。患者的流失率(29%)和临床医生对研究方案的依从性都足够。临床医生对在临床环境中使用该模型的可接受性以及他们对培训和在线资源的欣赏都是积极的。为未来的研究确定了改进模型在临床实践中的整合、研讨会的内容和数据收集方法的可行性的建议。还观察到所有患者报告的结果测量指标的积极影响。除了 PainDetect 问卷外,所有其他结果测量指标在干预后均显示出统计学上的显著降低(p<0.05)。

结论

这些发现提供了初步证据,表明 PDDM 模型有可能优化 LBP 管理,并进行未来更大规模的实用试验以确定其有效性。

试验注册

Clinicaltrial.gov:NCT03949179。

相似文献

1
Optimizing management of low back pain through the pain and disability drivers management model: A feasibility trial.通过疼痛和残疾驱动因素管理模型优化腰痛管理:一项可行性试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 20;16(1):e0245689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245689. eCollection 2021.
2
Optimising management of low back pain through the pain and disability drivers management model: Findings from a pilot cluster nonrandomised controlled trial.通过疼痛和残疾驱动因素管理模型优化腰痛管理:一项试点群非随机对照试验的结果。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2023 Sep;21(3):667-682. doi: 10.1002/msc.1738. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
3
GLA:D® Back Australia: a mixed methods feasibility study for implementation.GLA:D® 重返澳大利亚:一项用于实施的混合方法可行性研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2022 Apr 7;30(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00427-3.
4
Independent prescribing by advanced physiotherapists for patients with low back pain in primary care: A feasibility trial with an embedded qualitative component.独立处方权在初级保健中用于治疗下腰痛的高级物理治疗师:一项具有嵌入式定性部分的可行性试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 17;15(3):e0229792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229792. eCollection 2020.
5
Operationalization of the new Pain and Disability Drivers Management model: A modified Delphi survey of multidisciplinary pain management experts.新的疼痛和残疾驱动因素管理模型的实施:多学科疼痛管理专家的改良德尔菲调查。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;26(1):316-325. doi: 10.1111/jep.13190. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
6
A multicentred randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based cognitive behavioural programme for low back pain. The Back Skills Training (BeST) trial.一项基于初级保健的认知行为方案治疗腰痛的多中心随机对照试验。背部技能训练(BeST)试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Aug;14(41):1-253, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14410.
7
Effectiveness of App-Delivered, Tailored Self-management Support for Adults With Lower Back Pain-Related Disability: A selfBACK Randomized Clinical Trial.应用程序提供的、针对特定个体的自我管理支持对腰痛相关残疾的成年人的有效性:一项 selfBACK 随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1288-1296. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4097.
8
The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to management of low back pain in general practice: A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial.基层医疗中运用早期锻炼减少恐惧(FREE)方法治疗腰痛:一项实用的聚类随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 9;16(9):e1002897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002897. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
Using mixed methods evaluation to assess the feasibility of online clinical training in evidence based interventions: a case study of cognitive behavioural treatment for low back pain.运用混合方法评估来评估循证干预在线临床培训的可行性:以腰痛的认知行为治疗为例
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jun 18;16:163. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0683-4.
10
The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.早期恐惧减轻运动(FREE)治疗腰痛方法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 17;18(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2225-8.

引用本文的文献

1
People Living with Chronic Pain Experience a High Prevalence of Decision Regret in Canada: A Pan-Canadian Online Survey.加拿大慢性疼痛患者中决策后悔的发生率很高:一项全加拿大在线调查。
Med Decis Making. 2025 May;45(4):462-479. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251326069. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
2
Rehabilitation Management of Neck Pain-Development of a Diagnostic Framework Based on the Pain and Disability Drivers Management Model.颈部疼痛的康复管理——基于疼痛和残疾驱动因素管理模型的诊断框架的开发
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14299. doi: 10.1111/jep.14299.
3
Enrollment, adherence and retention rates among musculoskeletal disorders rehabilitation practitioners in knowledge translation studies: a systematic review and meta-regression.

本文引用的文献

1
Driving the Musculoskeletal Diagnosis Train on the High-Value Track.推动高价值轨道上的肌肉骨骼诊断列车。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Mar;50(3):118-120. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.0603.
2
Physiotherapists' perceptions of learning and implementing a biopsychosocial intervention to treat musculoskeletal pain conditions: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.物理治疗师对学习和实施生物心理社会干预措施以治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛病症的认知:定性研究的系统评价与综合分析
Pain. 2020 Jun;161(6):1150-1168. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001809.
3
Operationalization of the new Pain and Disability Drivers Management model: A modified Delphi survey of multidisciplinary pain management experts.
知识转化研究中肌肉骨骼疾病康复从业者的纳入、依从性和保留率:一项系统综述和元回归分析
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 May 3;5(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00585-w.
4
Investigating force-time characteristics of prone thoracic SMT and self-reported patient outcome measures: a feasibility study.探讨俯卧位胸椎 SMT 的力-时特征与患者自我报告结局指标的关系:一项可行性研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2023 Jul 7;31(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12998-023-00491-3.
5
Decisional needs assessment for patient-centred pain care in Canada: the DECIDE-PAIN study protocol.加拿大以患者为中心的疼痛护理决策需求评估:DECIDE-PAIN 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 8;13(5):e066189. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066189.
6
Establishing Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (Hindi Version) in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients Undergoing Multimodal Physical Therapy.确定魁北克腰痛残疾量表(印地语版)在接受多模式物理治疗的慢性下腰痛患者中的反应性和最小临床重要差异。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 20;11(4):621. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040621.
7
Back pain treatment: a new perspective.背痛治疗:一种新视角。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022 Jul 4;14:1759720X221100293. doi: 10.1177/1759720X221100293. eCollection 2022.
8
Development and content validity of a rating scale for the pain and disability drivers management model.疼痛与残疾驱动因素管理模型评定量表的开发与内容效度
Arch Physiother. 2022 May 16;12(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40945-022-00137-2.
新的疼痛和残疾驱动因素管理模型的实施:多学科疼痛管理专家的改良德尔菲调查。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;26(1):316-325. doi: 10.1111/jep.13190. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
4
Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain.非特异性下腰痛临床试验的核心结局测量工具。
Pain. 2018 Mar;159(3):481-495. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117.
5
Choosing the right outcome measurement instruments for patients with low back pain.选择适合腰痛患者的正确结局测量工具。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;30(6):1003-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
6
Rehabilitation management of low back pain - it's time to pull it all together!腰痛的康复管理——是时候整合一切了!
J Pain Res. 2017 Oct 3;10:2373-2385. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S146485. eCollection 2017.
7
Multidimensional Prognostic Modelling in People With Chronic Axial Low Back Pain.慢性轴性腰痛患者的多维预后模型
Clin J Pain. 2017 Oct;33(10):877-891. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000478.
8
Measurement Properties of the Central Sensitization Inventory: A Systematic Review.中枢敏化量表的测量属性:一项系统评价。
Pain Pract. 2018 Apr;18(4):544-554. doi: 10.1111/papr.12636. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
9
Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework.医疗保健干预措施的可接受性:综述概述及理论框架的构建
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8.
10
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.CONSORT 2010声明:随机对照试验和可行性试验的扩展
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 21;2:64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8. eCollection 2016.