Tousignant-Laflamme Yannick, Martel Marc Olivier, Joshi Anand B, Cook Chad E
School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Clinicial Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
J Pain Res. 2017 Oct 3;10:2373-2385. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S146485. eCollection 2017.
In the past, rehabilitation research initiatives for low back pain (LBP) have targeted outcome enhancement through personalized treatment approaches, namely through classification systems (CS). Although the use of CS has enhanced outcomes, common management practices have not changed, the prevalence of LBP is still high, and only selected patients meet the CS profile, namely those with a nociceptive context. Similarly, although practice guidelines propose some level of organization and occasionally a timeline of care provision, each mainly provides best practice for isolated treatment approaches. Moreover, there is no theoretical framework that has been proposed that guides the rehabilitation management process of mechanical LBP. In this commentary, we propose a model constituted of five domains (nociceptive drivers, nervous system dysfunction drivers, comorbidities drivers, cognitive-emotional drivers, and contextual drivers) grounded as mechanisms driving pain and/or disability in LBP. Each domain is linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, where once a patient is deemed suitable for rehabilitation, the clinician assesses elements of each domain in order to identify where the relative treatment efforts should be focused. This theoretical model is designed to provide a more comprehensive management overview, by appreciating the relative contribution of each domain driving pain and disability. Considering that the multiple domains driving pain and disability, and their interaction, requires a model that is comprehensive enough to identify and address each related issue, we consider that the proposed model has several positive implications for rehabilitation of this painful and highly prevalent musculoskeletal disorder.
过去,针对腰痛(LBP)的康复研究倡议旨在通过个性化治疗方法,即通过分类系统(CS)来提高治疗效果。尽管使用CS提高了治疗效果,但常见的管理做法并未改变,LBP的患病率仍然很高,而且只有部分患者符合CS特征,即那些具有伤害性背景的患者。同样,尽管实践指南提出了一定程度的组织架构,偶尔还提供护理时间表,但每个指南主要针对孤立的治疗方法提供最佳实践。此外,尚未提出指导机械性LBP康复管理过程的理论框架。在本评论中,我们提出了一个由五个领域(伤害性驱动因素、神经系统功能障碍驱动因素、合并症驱动因素、认知-情感驱动因素和情境驱动因素)构成的模型,这些领域是导致LBP疼痛和/或残疾的机制基础。每个领域都与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》相关联,一旦确定患者适合康复,临床医生就会评估每个领域的要素,以便确定相对治疗工作应集中在何处。该理论模型旨在通过认识到每个驱动疼痛和残疾的领域的相对贡献,提供更全面的管理概述。鉴于驱动疼痛和残疾的多个领域及其相互作用需要一个足够全面的模型来识别和解决每个相关问题,我们认为所提出的模型对这种疼痛且高度普遍的肌肉骨骼疾病的康复具有若干积极意义。