Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, 10032.
Tex Heart Inst J. 2020 Aug 1;47(4):250-257. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-19-6982.
To investigate whether transcatheter device closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is safe in children with pulmonary artery hypertension, we retrospectively analyzed our experience with 33 patients who underwent the procedure from January 2000 through August 2015. Pulmonary artery hypertension was defined as a pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI) >3 WU · m2. All 33 children (median age, 14.5 mo; median weight, 8.1 kg) underwent successful closure device implantation and were followed up for a median of 17.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 1.0-63.4 mo). During catheterization, the median PVRI was 4.1 WU · m2 (IQR, 3.6-5.3 WU · m2), and the median mean pulmonary artery pressure was 38.0 mmHg (IQR, 25.5-46.0 mmHg). Premature birth was associated with pulmonary vasodilator therapy at time of PDA closure ( P=0.001) but not with baseline PVRI (P=0.986). Three patients (9.1%) had device-related complications (one immediate embolization and 2 malpositions). Two of these complications involved embolization coils. Baseline pulmonary vasodilator therapy before closure was significantly associated with intensive care unit admission after closure (10/12 [83.3%] with baseline therapy vs 3/21 [14.3%] without; P <0.001). Of 11 patients receiving pulmonary vasodilators before closure and having a device in place long-term, 8 (72.7%) were weaned after closure (median, 24.0 mo [IQR, 11.0-25.0 mo]). We conclude that transcatheter PDA closure can be performed safely in many children with pulmonary artery hypertension and improve symptoms, particularly in patients born prematurely. Risk factors for adverse outcomes are multifactorial, including coil use and disease severity. Multicenter studies in larger patient populations are warranted.
为了研究经导管装置关闭动脉导管未闭(PDA)在肺动脉高压患儿中是否安全,我们回顾性分析了 2000 年 1 月至 2015 年 8 月期间接受该治疗的 33 例患儿的经验。肺动脉高压定义为肺血管阻力指数(PVRI)>3WU·m2。所有 33 例患儿(中位年龄 14.5 个月;中位体重 8.1kg)均成功进行了封堵器植入,并中位随访 17.2 个月(IQR,1.0-63.4 个月)。在导管插入过程中,中位 PVRI 为 4.1WU·m2(IQR,3.6-5.3WU·m2),中位平均肺动脉压为 38.0mmHg(IQR,25.5-46.0mmHg)。早产与 PDA 关闭时的肺血管扩张剂治疗相关(P=0.001),但与基线 PVRI 无关(P=0.986)。3 例患儿(9.1%)出现与器械相关的并发症(1 例即刻栓塞和 2 例错位)。其中 2 例并发症涉及栓塞线圈。封堵前的基线肺血管扩张剂治疗与封堵后入住重症监护病房显著相关(接受治疗的 12 例患儿中有 10 例[83.3%],未接受治疗的 21 例患儿中有 3 例[14.3%];P<0.001)。在 11 例封堵前接受肺血管扩张剂治疗且长期放置器械的患儿中,8 例(72.7%)在封堵后停药(中位时间 24.0 个月[IQR,11.0-25.0 个月])。我们得出结论,在许多患有肺动脉高压的患儿中,经导管 PDA 封堵术是安全的,可以改善症状,特别是在早产儿中。不良结局的危险因素是多因素的,包括线圈的使用和疾病的严重程度。需要在更大的患者群体中进行多中心研究。