Greiner Sebastian, Jud Andreas, Aurich Matthias, Hess Alexander, Hilbel Thomas, Hardt Stefan, Katus Hugo A, Mereles Derliz
Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (S.G., A.J., M.A., A.H., T.H., S.H., H.A.K., D.M.).
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Aug 21;3(4):e001103. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001103.
Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) is an important marker in cardiovascular disorders, being closely associated with morbidity and mortality. Noninvasive assessment by Doppler echocardiography is recommended by current guidelines. So far, the reliability of this method has been assessed only in small studies with contradictory results. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the reliability of noninvasive PAP assessment by Doppler echocardiography compared to invasive measurements in a large patient population.
We retrospectively analyzed data from a large tertiary cardiology department over 6 years in order to compare invasively measured PAP to estimated PAP from echocardiography examinations. N=15 516 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria and n=1695 patients with timely matched examinations (within 5 days) were analyzed. In n=1221 (72%) patients, pulmonary hypertension (PH) was diagnosed invasively (postcapillary PH: n=1122 [66%]; precapillary PH: n=99 [6%]). Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) was 45.3±15.5 mm Hg by Doppler echocardiography and 47.4±16.4 mm Hg by right heart catheterization. Pearson's correlation coefficient was r=0.87 (P<0.0001). Mean right atrial pressure (RAP) was 12.0±5.7 mm Hg by right heart catheterization and was estimated to be 12.1±6.6 mm Hg by echocardiography (r=0.82, P<0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of -2.0 mm Hg for sPAP (95% limits of agreement -18.1 to +14.1 mm Hg) and +1.0 mm Hg for RAP (95% limits of agreement +0.1 to +1.9 mm Hg). Noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension with Doppler echocardiography had a good sensitivity (87%) and specificity (79%), positive and negative predictive values (91% and 70%), as well as accuracy (85%) for a sPAP cut-off value of 36 mm Hg (AUC 0.91, P<0.001, CI 0.90 to 0.93).
In this study, Doppler echocardiography proved to be a reliable method for the assessment of sPAP, being well suited to establish the noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension in patients with cardiac diseases.
肺动脉压(PAP)是心血管疾病的一项重要指标,与发病率和死亡率密切相关。目前的指南推荐采用多普勒超声心动图进行无创评估。到目前为止,该方法的可靠性仅在一些小型研究中得到评估,结果相互矛盾。因此,本研究的目的是在大量患者群体中分析与有创测量相比,多普勒超声心动图无创评估PAP的可靠性。
我们回顾性分析了一家大型三级心脏病科6年的数据,以便将有创测量的PAP与超声心动图检查估算的PAP进行比较。N = 15516例患者符合纳入标准,对n = 1695例检查时间匹配(5天内)的患者进行了分析。在n = 1221例(72%)患者中,有创诊断为肺动脉高压(PH)(毛细血管后PH:n = 1122例[66%];毛细血管前PH:n = 99例[6%])。多普勒超声心动图测得的收缩期肺动脉压(sPAP)为45.3±15.5 mmHg,右心导管检查测得的为47.4±16.4 mmHg。Pearson相关系数为r = 0.87(P < 0.0001)。右心导管检查测得的平均右心房压(RAP)为12.0±5.7 mmHg,超声心动图估算值为12.1±6.6 mmHg(r = 0.82,P < 0.0001)。Bland-Altman分析显示,sPAP的偏差为 -2.0 mmHg(95%一致性界限为 -18.1至 +14.1 mmHg),RAP的偏差为 +1.0 mmHg(95%一致性界限为 +0.1至 +1.9 mmHg)。对于sPAP临界值为36 mmHg,多普勒超声心动图对肺动脉高压的无创诊断具有良好的敏感性(87%)、特异性(79%)、阳性和阴性预测值(91%和70%)以及准确性(85%)(AUC 0.91,P < 0.001,CI 0.90至0.93)。
在本研究中,多普勒超声心动图被证明是评估sPAP的可靠方法,非常适合对心脏病患者进行肺动脉高压的无创诊断。