University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Harvard Medical School.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Apr;33(4):739-755. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01672. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
What mechanisms underlie the prioritization of neural representations of visually perceived information to guide behavior? We assessed the dynamics whereby attention biases competition for representation of visual stimuli by enhancing representations of relevant information and suppressing the irrelevant. Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) classifiers were trained to discriminate patterns of fMRI activity associated with each of three stimuli, within several predefined ROIs. Participants performed a change-detection task wherein two of three presented items flashed at 1 Hz, one to each side of central fixation. Both flashing stimuli would unpredictably change state, but participants covertly counted the number of changes only for the cued item. In the ventral occipito-temporal ROI, MVPA evidence (a proxy for representational fidelity) was dynamically enhanced for attended stimuli and suppressed for unattended stimuli, consistent with a mechanism of biased competition between stimulus representations. Frontal and parietal ROIs displayed a qualitatively distinct, more "source-like" profile, wherein MVPA evidence for only the attended stimulus could be observed above baseline levels. To assess how attentional modulation of ventral occipito-temporal representations might relate to signals originating in the frontal and/or parietal ROIs, we analyzed informational connectivity (IC), which indexes time-varying covariation between regional levels of MVPA evidence. Parietal-posterior IC was elevated during the task, but did not differ for cued versus uncued items. Frontal-posterior IC, in contrast, was sensitive to an item's priority status. Thus, although regions of frontal and parietal cortex act as sources of top-down attentional control, their precise functions likely differ.
是什么机制使得视觉感知信息的神经表示优先化以指导行为?我们评估了注意力通过增强相关信息的表示并抑制不相关信息的表示来偏向竞争的视觉刺激的代表性的动态。多元模式分析 (MVPA) 分类器被训练来区分与三个刺激中的每一个相关的 fMRI 活动模式,在几个预定义的 ROI 内。参与者执行了一项变化检测任务,其中三个呈现的项目中的两个以 1 Hz 的频率闪烁,一个在中央注视点的每一侧。两个闪烁的刺激都会不可预测地改变状态,但参与者仅在提示项目中偷偷地数变化的次数。在腹侧枕颞 ROI 中,MVPA 证据(代表性保真度的代理)动态增强了注意力刺激,抑制了非注意力刺激,这与刺激表示之间的偏向竞争机制一致。额和顶叶 ROI 显示出一种不同的、更“源样”的特征,其中仅可观察到注意力刺激的 MVPA 证据高于基线水平。为了评估腹侧枕颞区代表的注意力调节如何与来自额和/或顶叶 ROI 的信号相关,我们分析了信息连通性 (IC),它索引了 MVPA 证据的区域水平之间随时间变化的协变。任务期间,顶叶后部的 IC 升高,但在提示项目和非提示项目之间没有差异。相比之下,额-顶叶 IC 对项目的优先级状态敏感。因此,尽管额和顶叶皮层的区域充当自上而下注意力控制的来源,但它们的精确功能可能不同。