Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53726, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Oct 1;27(10):4881-4890. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw283.
A long-standing assumption of cognitive neuroscience has been that working memory (WM) is accomplished by sustained, elevated neural activity. More recently, theories of WM have expanded this view by describing different attentional states in WM with differing activation levels. Several studies have used multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) data to study neural activity corresponding to these WM states. Intriguingly, no evidence was found for active neural representations for information held in WM outside the focus of attention ("unattended memory items," UMIs), suggesting that only attended memory items (AMIs) are accompanied by an active trace. However, these results depended on category-level decoding, which lacks sensitivity to neural representations of individual items. Therefore, we employed a WM task in which subjects remembered the directions of motion of two dot arrays, with a retrocue indicating which was relevant for an imminent memory probe (the AMI). This design allowed MVPA decoding of delay-period fMRI signal at the stimulus-item level, affording a more sensitive test of the neural representation of UMIs. Whereas evidence for the AMI was reliably high, evidence for the UMI dropped to baseline, consistent with the notion that different WM attentional states may have qualitatively different mechanisms of retention.
认知神经科学的一个长期假设是,工作记忆 (WM) 是通过持续的、升高的神经活动来完成的。最近,WM 的理论通过描述 WM 中的不同注意状态具有不同的激活水平来扩展了这一观点。几项研究使用功能磁共振成像 (fMRI) 和脑电图 (EEG) 数据的多元模式分析 (MVPA) 来研究与这些 WM 状态相对应的神经活动。有趣的是,没有发现证据表明在注意力焦点之外(“未注意的记忆项目”,UMIs)的 WM 中保存的信息存在活跃的神经表示,这表明只有被注意的记忆项目(AMIs)伴随着活跃的痕迹。然而,这些结果取决于类别水平的解码,这对单个项目的神经表示缺乏敏感性。因此,我们采用了一种 WM 任务,其中受试者记住了两个点数组的运动方向,一个回溯提示哪个与即将到来的记忆探针(AMI)相关。这种设计允许在刺激项目水平上对延迟期 fMRI 信号进行 MVPA 解码,从而更敏感地测试 UMIs 的神经表示。虽然 AMI 的证据可靠地很高,但 UMI 的证据降至基线,这与不同的 WM 注意状态可能具有不同的保持机制的观点一致。