Suppr超能文献

在短期记忆的不同注意状态下对信息进行类别内解码。

Within-Category Decoding of Information in Different Attentional States in Short-Term Memory.

机构信息

Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53726, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2017 Oct 1;27(10):4881-4890. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw283.

Abstract

A long-standing assumption of cognitive neuroscience has been that working memory (WM) is accomplished by sustained, elevated neural activity. More recently, theories of WM have expanded this view by describing different attentional states in WM with differing activation levels. Several studies have used multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) data to study neural activity corresponding to these WM states. Intriguingly, no evidence was found for active neural representations for information held in WM outside the focus of attention ("unattended memory items," UMIs), suggesting that only attended memory items (AMIs) are accompanied by an active trace. However, these results depended on category-level decoding, which lacks sensitivity to neural representations of individual items. Therefore, we employed a WM task in which subjects remembered the directions of motion of two dot arrays, with a retrocue indicating which was relevant for an imminent memory probe (the AMI). This design allowed MVPA decoding of delay-period fMRI signal at the stimulus-item level, affording a more sensitive test of the neural representation of UMIs. Whereas evidence for the AMI was reliably high, evidence for the UMI dropped to baseline, consistent with the notion that different WM attentional states may have qualitatively different mechanisms of retention.

摘要

认知神经科学的一个长期假设是,工作记忆 (WM) 是通过持续的、升高的神经活动来完成的。最近,WM 的理论通过描述 WM 中的不同注意状态具有不同的激活水平来扩展了这一观点。几项研究使用功能磁共振成像 (fMRI) 和脑电图 (EEG) 数据的多元模式分析 (MVPA) 来研究与这些 WM 状态相对应的神经活动。有趣的是,没有发现证据表明在注意力焦点之外(“未注意的记忆项目”,UMIs)的 WM 中保存的信息存在活跃的神经表示,这表明只有被注意的记忆项目(AMIs)伴随着活跃的痕迹。然而,这些结果取决于类别水平的解码,这对单个项目的神经表示缺乏敏感性。因此,我们采用了一种 WM 任务,其中受试者记住了两个点数组的运动方向,一个回溯提示哪个与即将到来的记忆探针(AMI)相关。这种设计允许在刺激项目水平上对延迟期 fMRI 信号进行 MVPA 解码,从而更敏感地测试 UMIs 的神经表示。虽然 AMI 的证据可靠地很高,但 UMI 的证据降至基线,这与不同的 WM 注意状态可能具有不同的保持机制的观点一致。

相似文献

1
Within-Category Decoding of Information in Different Attentional States in Short-Term Memory.
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Oct 1;27(10):4881-4890. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw283.
2
The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention.
Mem Cognit. 2015 Apr;43(3):453-68. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0486-y.
3
The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 May;32(5):917-944. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01517. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
4
Parietal-Occipital Interactions Underlying Control- and Representation-Related Processes in Working Memory for Nonspatial Visual Features.
J Neurosci. 2018 May 2;38(18):4357-4366. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2747-17.2018. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
5
Electrophysiological evidence supports the role of sustained visuospatial attention in maintaining visual WM contents.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Dec;146:54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.09.011. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
6
Neural evidence for a distinction between short-term memory and the focus of attention.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;24(1):61-79. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00140. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
7
Decoding working memory content from attentional biases.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1252-1260. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1204-5.
9
Refreshing memory traces: thinking of an item improves retrieval from visual working memory.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:20-31. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12603. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
10
Unimodal and Bimodal Access to Sensory Working Memories by Auditory and Visual Impulses.
J Neurosci. 2020 Jan 15;40(3):671-681. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1194-19.2019. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Prioritizing Working Memory Resources Depends on the Prefrontal Cortex.
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 12;45(11):e1552242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1552-24.2025.
2
Goal-directed attention transforms both working and long-term memory representations in the human parietal cortex.
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jul 15;22(7):e3002721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002721. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Representation and computation in visual working memory.
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jun;8(6):1016-1034. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01871-2. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
4
Representing Context and Priority in Working Memory.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jun 1;36(7):1374-1394. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02166.
6
Predicted utility modulates working memory fidelity in the brain.
Cortex. 2023 Mar;160:115-133. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.09.018. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
7
Interference between items stored for distinct tasks in visual working memory.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul;85(5):1461-1473. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02657-w. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
8
Differences of resource allocation to active and passive states in visual working memory.
Psychol Res. 2023 Sep;87(6):1761-1767. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01772-x. Epub 2022 Nov 27.
10
Behavioral Prioritization Enhances Working Memory Precision and Neural Population Gain.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jan 5;34(2):365-379. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01804.

本文引用的文献

1
The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention.
Mem Cognit. 2015 Apr;43(3):453-68. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0486-y.
2
Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results.
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 29;5:781. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781. eCollection 2014.
3
Working models of working memory.
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014 Apr;25:20-4. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
4
Multiple neural states of representation in short-term memory? It's a matter of attention.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jan 23;8:5. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00005. eCollection 2014.
5
Shared representations for working memory and mental imagery in early visual cortex.
Curr Biol. 2013 Aug 5;23(15):1427-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.065. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
6
Goal-dependent dissociation of visual and prefrontal cortices during working memory.
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Aug;16(8):997-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.3452. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
8
Decoding attended information in short-term memory: an EEG study.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jan;25(1):127-42. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00305.
10
Decoding the internal focus of attention.
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Mar;50(4):470-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.006. Epub 2011 Nov 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验