Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Sector 12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Department of Anesthesia, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Sector 12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Apr;163(4):1053-1060. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04723-4. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
The COVID19 lockdown has altered the dynamics of living. Its collateral fallout on head injury care has not been studied in detail, especially from low- and middle-income countries, possibly overwhelmed more than developed nations. Here, we analyze the effects of COVID19 restrictions on head injury patients in a high-volume Indian referral trauma center.
From the prospective trauma registry, clinico-epidemiological and radiological parameters of patients managed during 190 days before and 190 days during COVID19 phases were studied. As an indicator of care, the inpatient mortality of patients with severe HI was also compared with appropriate statistical analyses.
Of the total 3372 patients, there were 83 head injury admissions per week before COVID19 restrictions, which decreased to 33 every week (60% drop) during the lock phases and stabilized at 46 per week during the unlock phases. COVID19 restrictions caused a significant increase in the proportion of patients arriving directly without resuscitation at peripheral centers and later than 6 h of injury. Though the most common mechanism was vehicular, a relative increase in the proportion of assaults was noted during COVID19. There was no change in the distribution of mild, moderate, and severe injuries. Despite a decrease in the percentage of patients with systemic illnesses, severe head injury mortality was significantly more during the lock phases than before COVID19 (59% vs. 47%, p = 0.02).
COVID19 restrictions have amplified the already delayed admission among patients of head injury from north-west India. The severe head injury mortality was significantly greater during lock phases than before COVID19, highlighting the collateral fallout of lockdown. Pandemic control measures in the future should not ignore the concerns of trauma emergency care.
COVID19 封锁改变了人们的生活动态。但其对头部损伤治疗的间接影响尚未得到详细研究,特别是在中低收入国家,这些国家可能比发达国家受到的影响更大。在这里,我们分析了 COVID19 限制对印度一家高容量创伤中心头部损伤患者的影响。
从前瞻性创伤登记处,研究了在 COVID19 限制前 190 天和限制期间 190 天期间管理的患者的临床流行病学和影像学参数。作为护理指标,还比较了严重头部损伤患者的住院死亡率,并进行了适当的统计分析。
在总共 3372 名患者中,COVID19 限制前每周有 83 名头部损伤患者入院,限制期间每周减少到 33 名(下降 60%),在解锁期间稳定在每周 46 名。COVID19 限制导致直接从外围中心无复苏到达且受伤后超过 6 小时的患者比例显著增加。虽然最常见的机制是交通工具,但在 COVID19 期间注意到攻击的比例相对增加。轻度、中度和重度损伤的分布没有变化。尽管患有系统性疾病的患者比例下降,但锁定期的严重头部损伤死亡率明显高于 COVID19 之前(59%比 47%,p=0.02)。
COVID19 限制放大了来自印度西北部的头部损伤患者已经延迟的入院情况。与 COVID19 之前相比,锁定期的严重头部损伤死亡率明显更高,突出了封锁的间接影响。未来的大流行控制措施不应忽视创伤急救护理的关注。