• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Manchurian Plague and COVID-19: China, the United States, and the "Sick Man," Then and Now.《满洲鼠疫与 COVID-19:中国、美国与“病夫”,彼时与此时》
Am J Public Health. 2021 Mar;111(3):423-429. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305960. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
Controlling Ebola: what we can learn from China's 1911 battle against the pneumonic plague in Manchuria.控制埃博拉:我们能从中国1911年抗击满洲肺鼠疫中学到什么。
Int J Infect Dis. 2015 Apr;33:222-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
3
The plague fighter: Wu Lien-teh and the beginning of the Chinese public health system.鼠疫斗士:伍连德与中国公共卫生体系的开端
Ann Sci. 1996 Jul;53(4):361-80. doi: 10.1080/00033799608560822.
4
The COVID-19 Pandemic in Historical Perspective: An Dossier.历史视角下的新冠疫情:一份档案
Am J Public Health. 2021 Mar;111(3):402-404. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306136.
5
[Isolation and distancing during the plague epidemics].[鼠疫流行期间的隔离与 distancing(此处“distancing”可能有误,结合语境推测可能是“隔离”之意,若有误请根据正确内容调整)]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2020 Dec 3;164:D5440.
6
Differential mortality of infectious disease in Italian polities: COVID-19, past plague epidemics, and currently endemic respiratory disease.意大利政治实体中传染病的差异死亡率:COVID-19、过去的鼠疫流行以及当前流行的呼吸道疾病。
Infect Genet Evol. 2021 Nov;95:105081. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105081. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
7
Plagues, pandemics and epidemics in Irish history prior to COVID-19 (coronavirus): what can we learn?在 COVID-19(冠状病毒)之前的爱尔兰历史上的瘟疫、大流行和流行病:我们能从中吸取什么教训?
Ir J Psychol Med. 2020 Dec;37(4):269-274. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2020.25. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
8
Richard Pearson Strong and the Manchurian epidemic of pneumonic plague, 1910-1911.理查德·皮尔逊·斯特朗与1910 - 1911年满洲里肺鼠疫疫情
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1989 Jul;44(3):296-319. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/44.3.296.
9
Politics, Pushback, and Pandemics: Challenges to Public Health Orders in the 1918 Influenza Pandemic.政治、抵制和大流行:1918 年流感大流行期间公共卫生命令面临的挑战。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Mar;111(3):416-422. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305958. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
10
Plague Masks: The Visual Emergence of Anti-Epidemic Personal Protection Equipment.瘟疫面具:防疫个人防护装备的视觉呈现
Med Anthropol. 2018 Aug-Sep;37(6):442-457. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2017.1423072. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The Manchurian pandemic of pneumonic plague (1910-1911).满洲肺鼠疫大流行(1910 - 1911年)。
Infez Med. 2022 Sep 1;30(3):464-468. doi: 10.53854/liim-3003-17. eCollection 2022.
2
The Emergence and Development of Hygienic Masks in Colonial Korea.《论殖民地朝鲜卫生口罩的出现与发展》。
Uisahak. 2022 Apr;31(1):181-220. doi: 10.13081/kjmh.2022.31.181.
3
Evaluating the Association of Face Covering Mandates on COVID-19 Severity by State.评估各州实施面部遮盖令对 COVID-19 严重程度的影响。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221086720. doi: 10.1177/21501319221086720.
4
Assessing face masks in the environment by means of the DPSIR framework.利用 DPSIR 框架评估环境中的口罩。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 25;814:152859. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152859. Epub 2022 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Possible Bat Origin of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.可能源自蝙蝠的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;26(7):1542-1547. doi: 10.3201/eid2607.200092. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
2
Visualizing the Geography of the Diseases of China: Western Disease Maps from Analytical Tools to Tools of Empire, Sovereignty, and Public Health Propaganda, 1878-1929.可视化中国疾病地理:从分析工具到帝国、主权与公共卫生宣传工具的西方疾病地图,1878 - 1929年
Sci Context. 2017 Sep;30(3):219-280. doi: 10.1017/S0269889717000205.
3
Pneumonic Plague: The Darker Side of Yersinia pestis.肺鼠疫:鼠疫耶尔森菌的另一面。
Trends Microbiol. 2016 Mar;24(3):190-197. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.11.008. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
4
Epidemic and population patterns in the Chinese Empire (243 B.C.E. to 1911 C.E.): quantitative analysis of a unique but neglected epidemic catalogue.中华帝国(公元前243年至公元1911年)的疫情与人口模式:对一份独特但被忽视的疫情目录的定量分析
Epidemiol Infect. 2009 Oct;137(10):1361-8. doi: 10.1017/S0950268809990136. Epub 2009 Jun 4.

《满洲鼠疫与 COVID-19:中国、美国与“病夫”,彼时与此时》

The Manchurian Plague and COVID-19: China, the United States, and the "Sick Man," Then and Now.

机构信息

The author is with the Departments of History and Asian Studies, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2021 Mar;111(3):423-429. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305960. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305960
PMID:33476233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7893341/
Abstract

In this article, I explore the historical resonances between China's 1911 pneumonic plague and our current situation with COVID-19. At the turn of the 20th century, China was labeled "the Sick Man of the Far East": a once-powerful country that had become burdened by opium addiction, infectious disease, and an ineffective government. In 1911, this weakened China faced an outbreak of pneumonic plague in Manchuria that killed more than 60 000 people. After the 1911 plague, a revolutionized China radically restructured its approach to public health to eliminate the stigma of being "the Sick Man." Ironically, given the US mishandling of the COVID pandemic, observers in today's China are now calling the United States "the Sick Man of the West": a country burdened by opioid addiction, infectious disease, and an ineffective government. The historical significance of the phrase "Sick Man"-and its potential to now be associated with the United States-highlights the continued links between epidemic control and international status in a changing world. This historical comparison also reveals that plagues bring not only tragedy but also the opportunity for change.

摘要

在这篇文章中,我探讨了中国 1911 年肺鼠疫与当前新冠疫情之间的历史共鸣。在 20 世纪之交,中国被贴上了“东亚病夫”的标签:一个曾经强大的国家,如今却深受鸦片瘾、传染病和无效政府的困扰。1911 年,这个虚弱的中国在东北地区爆发了肺鼠疫,导致超过 6 万人死亡。1911 年鼠疫之后,革命后的中国彻底改革了公共卫生措施,以消除“东亚病夫”的耻辱。具有讽刺意味的是,鉴于美国对新冠疫情的处理不当,如今中国的观察家们开始称美国为“西方病夫”:一个深受阿片类药物成瘾、传染病和无效政府困扰的国家。“病夫”一词的历史意义——以及它现在与美国联系在一起的可能性——凸显了在不断变化的世界中,传染病控制与国际地位之间的持续联系。这一历史对比还表明,瘟疫不仅带来悲剧,也带来变革的机会。