Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Neuromodulation. 2022 Aug;25(6):877-887. doi: 10.1111/ner.13356. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
Open questions remain regarding the optimal target, or sweetspot, for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in, for example, Parkinson's disease. Previous studies introduced different methods of mapping DBS effects to determine sweetspots. While having a direct impact on surgical targeting and postoperative programming in DBS, these methods so far have not been compared.
This study investigated five previously published DBS mapping approaches regarding their potential to correctly identify a predefined target. Methods were investigated in silico in eight different use-case scenarios, which incorporated different types of clinical data, noise, and differences in underlying neuroanatomy. Dice coefficients were calculated to determine the overlap between identified sweetspots and the predefined target. Additionally, out-of-sample predictive capabilities were assessed using the amount of explained variance R.
The five investigated methods resulted in highly variable sweetspots. Methods based on voxel-wise statistics against average outcomes showed the best performance overall. While predictive capabilities were high, even in the best of cases Dice coefficients remained limited to values around 0.5, highlighting the overall limitations of sweetspot identification.
This study highlights the strengths and limitations of current approaches to DBS sweetspot mapping. Those limitations need to be taken into account when considering the clinical implications. All future approaches should be investigated in silico before being applied to clinical data.
深部脑刺激(DBS)的最佳靶点或“甜蜜点”仍存在诸多疑问,例如在帕金森病中。先前的研究介绍了不同的方法来映射 DBS 效应以确定甜蜜点。虽然这些方法直接影响 DBS 的手术靶向和术后编程,但迄今为止尚未对这些方法进行比较。
本研究针对五个已发表的 DBS 映射方法,调查了它们在正确识别预定目标方面的潜力。在八种不同的使用案例场景中,对方法进行了计算机模拟研究,这些场景纳入了不同类型的临床数据、噪声以及神经解剖结构的差异。通过计算 Dice 系数来确定识别出的甜蜜点与预定目标之间的重叠程度。此外,还使用解释方差 R 的数量来评估样本外的预测能力。
五种研究方法得出的甜蜜点结果差异很大。针对平均结果的体素统计方法显示出总体最佳性能。尽管预测能力很高,但即使在最佳情况下,Dice 系数仍限于约 0.5 的值,这突出了甜蜜点识别的总体局限性。
本研究强调了当前 DBS 甜蜜点映射方法的优缺点。在考虑临床意义时,需要考虑到这些局限性。所有未来的方法都应该在应用于临床数据之前进行计算机模拟研究。