Suppr超能文献

[气枪与声驱鸟器有效驱鸟距离的比较评估]

[Comparative evaluation of efficient bird repeller distance between gas gun and sound bird repeller].

作者信息

Jin Lin-Yu, Li Shu-Meng, Zhao Xiao-Ying, Liu Tai-Shan, Fan Chen, Li Dong-Lai

机构信息

College of Life Sciences, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China.

Chengdu Tianfu International Airport Branch of Sichuan Airport Group Limited Company, Chengdu 641419, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Jan;32(1):326-332. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202101.038.

Abstract

Bird strike accidents mainly occur in the airport area. Reducing bird activities through bird repeller equipment is one of the main measures to prevent bird strike. In this study, two bird species with high-risk, pigeon () and kestrel (), were selected as the subjects and the gas gun and directional acoustic bird repeller were selected as the evaluation objects in Shenyang Taoxian International Airport. This study aimed to examine the behavioral responses of birds at different distances during the normal operation of these equipment to explore their effective distance and effects. The results showed that the vigilant and escape behaviors of pigeons and kestrels at 10 m and 30 m away from the gas gun bird repeller which were significantly higher than those of the control, while the number of these behaviors at 50 m away was not significantly different from that of the control. Pigeons and kestrels at 50 m and 100 m away from the directional acoustic bird repeller could significantly increase their vigilant and escape behaviors, whereas the repeller could significantly cause kestrels to increase their vigilant behavior at 300 m away. We concluded that the effective bird expel distance of the gas gun was 30 m, and the directional acoustic bird repeller could effectively expel to 300 m, and that the effect of the directional acoustic bird repeller on birds was stronger than the gas gun. Our results could provide a reference for the introduction and rational use of bird expel equipment in the airports.

摘要

鸟击事故主要发生在机场区域。通过驱鸟设备减少鸟类活动是预防鸟击的主要措施之一。本研究选取了沈阳桃仙国际机场两种高危鸟类——家鸽( )和红隼( )作为研究对象,选取气炮和定向声波驱鸟器作为评估对象。本研究旨在考察这些设备正常运行时鸟类在不同距离的行为反应,以探究其有效距离和效果。结果表明,家鸽和红隼在距气炮驱鸟器10米和30米处的警戒和逃避行为显著高于对照组,而在50米处这些行为的数量与对照组无显著差异。家鸽和红隼在距定向声波驱鸟器50米和100米处时,其警戒和逃避行为会显著增加,而该驱鸟器在300米处可显著使红隼的警戒行为增加。我们得出结论,气炮的有效驱鸟距离为30米,定向声波驱鸟器可有效驱赶至300米,且定向声波驱鸟器对鸟类的作用强于气炮。我们的研究结果可为机场引进和合理使用驱鸟设备提供参考。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验