Machado Marina, Chamorro de Vega Esther, Martínez-Jiménez María Del Carmen, Rodríguez-González Carmen Guadalupe, Vena Antonio, Navarro Raquel, Zamora-Cintas María Isabel, Agnelli Caroline, Olmedo María, Galar Alicia, Guinea Jesús, Fernández-Cruz Ana, Alonso Roberto, Bouza Emilio, Muñoz Patricia, Valerio Maricela
Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
J Fungi (Basel). 2021 Jan 17;7(1):59. doi: 10.3390/jof7010059.
The implementation of 1,3 β-d-glucan (BDG) has been proposed as a diagnostic tool in antifungal stewardship programs (ASPs). We aimed to analyze the influence of serum BDG in an ASP for oncologic patients and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We conducted a pre-post study. In the initial period (PRE), the ASP was based on bedside advice, and this was complemented with BDG in the post-period (POST). Performance parameters of the BDG assay were determined. Antifungal (AF) use adequacy was evaluated using a point score. Clinical outcomes and AF costs were also compared before and after the intervention. Overall, 85 patients were included in the PRE-period and 112 in the POST-period. Probable or proven fungal infections were similar in both groups (54.1% vs. 57.1%; = 0.67). The determination of BDG contributed to improved management in 75 of 112 patients (66.9%). The AF adequacy score improved in the POST-period (mean 7.75 vs. 9.29; < 0.001). Median days of empiric AF treatment was reduced in the POST-period (9 vs. 5 days, = 0.04). All-cause mortality (44.7% vs. 34.8%; = 0.16) was similar in both periods. The cost of AF treatments was reduced in the POST-period with a difference of 779.6 €/patient. Our data suggest that the use of BDG was a cost-effective strategy that contributed to safely improving the results of an ASP for SOT and oncologic patients.
1,3-β-D-葡聚糖(BDG)检测已被提议作为抗真菌管理计划(ASP)中的一种诊断工具。我们旨在分析血清BDG在针对肿瘤患者和实体器官移植(SOT)受者的ASP中的影响。我们进行了一项前后对照研究。在初始阶段(PRE),ASP基于床边建议,并在后期(POST)辅以BDG检测。确定了BDG检测的性能参数。使用评分系统评估抗真菌(AF)药物使用的合理性。还比较了干预前后的临床结果和AF成本。总体而言,PRE阶段纳入85例患者,POST阶段纳入112例患者。两组中可能或确诊的真菌感染情况相似(54.1%对57.1%;P = 0.67)。在112例患者中的75例(66.9%)中,BDG检测有助于改善管理。POST阶段AF合理性评分有所提高(平均7.75对9.29;P < 0.001)。POST阶段经验性AF治疗的中位天数减少(9天对5天,P = 0.04)。两个阶段的全因死亡率相似(44.7%对34.8%;P = 0.16)。POST阶段AF治疗成本降低,每位患者相差779.6欧元。我们的数据表明,使用BDG是一种具有成本效益的策略,有助于安全地改善针对SOT和肿瘤患者的ASP的效果。