Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital, 1-21-1 Mutsuurahigasi, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0037, Japan.
BMC Surg. 2021 Jan 21;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01053-1.
Most evidence regarding lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer is from expert settings. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure in a practice-based cohort.
A total of 383 patients who were diagnosed with stage II-III mid-to-low rectal cancer between 2010 and 2019 and underwent primary resection with curative intent at a general surgery unit were retrospectively reviewed. After propensity matching, 144 patients were divided into the following groups for short- and long-term outcome evaluation: mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection (n = 72) and mesorectal excision (n = 72).
This practice-based cohort was characterized by a high pT4 (41.6%) and R1 resection (10.4%) rate. Although the operative time was longer in the lateral dissection group (349 min vs. 237 min, p < 0.001), postoperative complications (19.4% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.829), and hospital stay (18 days vs. 22 days, p = 0.059) did not significantly differ; 5-year relapse-free survival (62.5% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.378), and cumulative local recurrence (9.7% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.451) were also in the same range in both groups. In the seven locally recurrent cases in the lateral dissection group, four had undergone R1 resection.
Lateral lymph node dissection was found to be safe in this practice-based cohort; however, the local control effect was not obvious. To maximize the potential merits of lateral lymph node dissection, strategies need to be urgently established to avoid R1 resection in clinical practice.
大多数关于直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的证据来自专家的观点。本研究旨在评估该术式在基于实践的队列中的安全性和有效性。
回顾性分析了 2010 年至 2019 年间在普外科接受原发性根治性切除手术、诊断为 II-III 期中低位直肠癌的 383 例患者的临床资料。通过倾向评分匹配,将 144 例患者分为短期和长期结局评估的两组:直肠系膜切除术加侧方淋巴结清扫术(n=72)和直肠系膜切除术(n=72)。
该基于实践的队列的特点是高 pT4(41.6%)和 R1 切除(10.4%)率。尽管侧方清扫组的手术时间较长(349 分钟比 237 分钟,p<0.001),但术后并发症(19.4%比 16.7%,p=0.829)和住院时间(18 天比 22 天,p=0.059)无显著差异;5 年无复发生存率(62.5%比 66.4%,p=0.378)和累积局部复发率(9.7%比 15.3%,p=0.451)也在两组之间无明显差异。在侧方清扫组的 7 例局部复发病例中,有 4 例为 R1 切除。
在本基于实践的队列中,侧方淋巴结清扫术是安全的;然而,局部控制效果并不明显。为了最大限度地发挥侧方淋巴结清扫术的潜在优势,需要紧急制定策略,以避免在临床实践中出现 R1 切除。