Suppr超能文献

为什么、何时以及如何让二级保健临床医生进行紧急护理和治疗计划的对话?ReSPECT 评估研究的定性发现。

Why, when and how do secondary-care clinicians have emergency care and treatment planning conversations? Qualitative findings from the ReSPECT Evaluation study.

机构信息

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, UK.

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, UK.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2021 May;162:343-350. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) is an emergency care and treatment planning (ECTP) process, developed to offer a patient-centred approach to deciding about and recording treatment recommendations. Conversations between clinicians and patients or their representatives are central to the ReSPECT process. This study aims to understand why, when, and how ReSPECT conversations unfold in practice.

METHODS

ReSPECT conversations were observed in hospitals within six acute National Health Service (NHS) trusts in England; the clinicians who conducted these conversations were interviewed. Following observation-based thematic analysis, five ReSPECT conversation types were identified: resuscitation and escalation; confirmation of decision; bad news; palliative care; and clinical decision. Interview-based thematic analysis examined the reasons and prompts for each conversation type, and the level of detail and patient engagement in these different conversations.

RESULTS

Whereas resuscitation and escalation conversations concerned possible futures, palliative care and bad news conversations responded to present-tense changes. Conversations were timed to respond to organisational, clinical, and patient/relative prompts. While bad news and palliative care conversations included detailed discussions of treatment options beyond CPR, this varied in other conversation types. ReSPECT conversations varied in doctors' engagement with patient/relative preferences, with only palliative care conversations consistently including an open-ended approach.

CONCLUSIONS

While ReSPECT supports holistic, person-centred, anticipatory decision-making in some situations, a gap remains between the ReSPECT's aims and their implementation in practice. Promoting an understanding and valuing of the aims of ReSPECT among clinicians, supported by appropriate training and structural support, will enhance ReSPECT conversations.

摘要

背景

推荐的紧急医疗和治疗计划(ReSPECT)是一种紧急医疗和治疗规划(ECTP)流程,旨在为决策和记录治疗建议提供以患者为中心的方法。临床医生与患者或其代表之间的对话是 ReSPECT 流程的核心。本研究旨在了解为什么、何时以及如何在实践中展开 ReSPECT 对话。

方法

在英格兰六个急性国民保健服务(NHS)信托医院观察 ReSPECT 对话;对进行这些对话的临床医生进行了访谈。在基于观察的主题分析之后,确定了五种 ReSPECT 对话类型:复苏和升级;确认决策;坏消息;姑息治疗;和临床决策。基于访谈的主题分析检查了每种对话类型的原因和提示,以及这些不同对话的详细程度和患者参与度。

结果

虽然复苏和升级对话涉及可能的未来,但姑息治疗和坏消息对话则针对当前的变化。对话的时间安排是为了响应组织、临床和患者/家属的提示。虽然坏消息和姑息治疗对话包括除心肺复苏术之外的治疗选择的详细讨论,但其他对话类型则有所不同。ReSPECT 对话在医生与患者/家属偏好的参与程度上有所不同,只有姑息治疗对话始终包括一种开放式方法。

结论

虽然 ReSPECT 在某些情况下支持整体、以患者为中心、前瞻性的决策制定,但在 ReSPECT 的目标与其在实践中的实施之间仍存在差距。通过适当的培训和结构支持,在临床医生中促进对 ReSPECT 目标的理解和重视,将增强 ReSPECT 对话。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验