Combined versus Sequential Phacoemulsification and Pars Plana Vitrectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

TOPIC

It is unclear whether differences exist in efficacy and safety between combined versus sequentially performed phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy (phaco-PPV).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and incidence of complications between these surgical methods.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for articles reporting the efficacy and safety of combined versus sequential phaco-PPV for any indication. The primary outcomes were postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and mean absolute refractive error from target (RET). Secondary outcomes included efficacy outcomes and postoperative complications. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model in all cases. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for randomized trials and ROBINS-I tool for observational studies.

RESULTS

Of the 5410 articles identified, 1 randomized controlled trial and 14 comparative studies were included, with 1407 and 951 eyes in the combined and sequential surgery groups, respectively. Mean age was 62.71 ± 6.16 years and 44% (range, 32.1%-70%) of eyes were from men. The mean baseline BCVA was 0.88 ± 0.59 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units (Snellen equivalent, 20/152). The meta-analysis showed no significance between groups in postoperative mean BCVA (P = 0.76) and mean absolute RET (P = 0.46). The risks of synechiae formation (risk ratio [RR], 2.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.83-4.11; P < 0.001), fibrin formation (RR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.84-4.30; P < 0.001), and intraoperative or postoperative retinal detachment (RR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.08-6.47; P = 0.03) were significantly higher after combined surgery. However, the risks of posterior capsular tear (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.73; P = 0.002) and macular hole nonclosure or reopening (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.03-0.93; P = 0.04) were significantly lower in the combined group.

DISCUSSION

No significant differences were found in visual and refractive outcomes between combined and sequential phaco-PPV, whereas differences existed in certain safety outcomes. These conclusions remain preliminary, as most evidence is derived from low- to moderate-quality retrospective studies. Given the variability in outcome reporting and associated heterogeneity, future randomized controlled trials are needed.