Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
2Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Jan 22;34(4):623-631. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.SPINE20860. Print 2021 Apr 1.
Type II odontoid fractures may be managed operatively or nonoperatively. If managed with bracing, bony union may never occur despite stability. This phenomenon is termed fibrous union. The authors aimed to determine associations with stable fibrous union and compare the morbidity of patients managed operatively and nonoperatively.
The authors performed a retrospective review of their spine trauma database for adults with type II odontoid fractures between 2015 and 2019. Two-sample t-tests and Fisher's exact tests identified associations with follow-up stability and were used to compare operative and nonoperative outcomes. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated to validate initial stable upright cervical radiographs related to follow-up stability.
Among 88 patients, 10% received upfront surgical fixation, and 90% were managed nonoperatively, of whom 22% had fracture instability on follow-up. Associations with instability after nonoperative management include myelopathy (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.0-0.92), cerebrovascular disease (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-1.0), and dens displacement ≥ 2 mm (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.07-1.0). Advanced age was not associated with follow-up instability. Initial stability on upright radiographs was associated with stability on follow-up (OR 4.29, 95% CI 1.0-18) with excellent sensitivity and positive predictive value (sensitivity 89%, specificity 35%, positive predictive value 83%, and negative predictive value 46%). The overall complication rate and respiratory failure requiring ventilation on individual complication analysis were more common in operatively managed patients (33% vs 3%, respectively; p = 0.007), even though they were generally younger and healthier than those managed nonoperatively. Operative or nonoperative management conferred no difference in length of hospital or ICU stay, discharge disposition, or mortality.
The authors delineate the validity of upright cervical radiographs on presentation in association with follow-up stability in type II odontoid fractures. In their experience, factors associated with instability included cervical myelopathy, cerebrovascular disease, and fracture displacement but not increased age. Operatively managed patients had higher complication rates than those managed without surgery. Fibrous union, which can occur with nonoperative management, provided adequate stability.
II 型齿状突骨折可通过手术或非手术治疗。如果采用支具治疗,尽管稳定,但骨愈合可能永远不会发生。这种现象被称为纤维愈合。作者旨在确定与稳定的纤维愈合相关的因素,并比较手术和非手术治疗的患者的发病率。
作者对 2015 年至 2019 年间其脊柱创伤数据库中 II 型齿状突骨折的成人患者进行了回顾性研究。双样本 t 检验和 Fisher 确切检验确定了与随访稳定性相关的因素,并用于比较手术和非手术治疗的结果。为了验证与随访稳定性相关的初始直立颈椎 X 线片的稳定性,计算了敏感性、特异性和预测值。
在 88 例患者中,10%接受了初始手术固定,90%接受了非手术治疗,其中 22%在随访时出现骨折不稳定。非手术治疗后不稳定的相关因素包括脊髓病(OR 0.04,95%CI 0.0-0.92)、脑血管疾病(OR 0.23,95%CI 0.06-1.0)和齿突移位≥2mm(OR 0.29,95%CI 0.07-1.0)。年龄较大与随访时的不稳定无关。初始直立位 X 线片的稳定性与随访时的稳定性相关(OR 4.29,95%CI 1.0-18),具有良好的敏感性和阳性预测值(敏感性 89%,特异性 35%,阳性预测值 83%,阴性预测值 46%)。在个别并发症分析中,手术治疗患者的总体并发症发生率和需要通气的呼吸衰竭发生率更高(分别为 33%和 3%;p=0.007),尽管他们通常比非手术治疗患者更年轻、更健康。手术或非手术治疗在住院时间、ICU 住院时间、出院去向或死亡率方面没有差异。
作者描述了 II 型齿状突骨折患者就诊时直立颈椎 X 线片与随访稳定性的相关性。根据他们的经验,与不稳定相关的因素包括颈椎脊髓病、脑血管疾病和骨折移位,但与年龄增加无关。手术治疗患者的并发症发生率高于非手术治疗患者。非手术治疗可导致纤维愈合,但可提供足够的稳定性。